From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D95A19D072; Fri, 7 Feb 2025 19:27:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1738956438; cv=none; b=fHSn8FaAkJY2O84shT6R2kVJw71EMDHO33wBM036QlGl6nGEhxKndQM0nPaldWzIpD6Xi+cmeOSputsE/kzVKfOBnaTH6Qx7E4AspYnk5vArtAExBOUUJslCEWI0SSJaL1UOojT3gN2hfu6dKIsE2l7PJI3kr3oVU7RQ7tfAH3s= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1738956438; c=relaxed/simple; bh=z3xoqMMMda5suYBfxMjs8okCGL2VmRVbOHMyyMa1JQ0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=uRL5sTUAncRqvrXotSHXoqnsejH7JVXjYHG9W6iZtFmWuZYP3/ES2QiWNXoUkXiUXJy+xDej0Ivb6AI3VCU5DyjOm0xz5SvB7Q/iBfdZoQLWGBLHQlzlzF2aFDmQDRlLXXSsrNR0kXqW2hdT5yrxwSnv9K52PpdHT4xqyZ0bNO4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=V1bPf6WD; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="V1bPf6WD" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7BDAEC4CED1; Fri, 7 Feb 2025 19:27:16 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1738956436; bh=z3xoqMMMda5suYBfxMjs8okCGL2VmRVbOHMyyMa1JQ0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=V1bPf6WD+16FbN25mSO538u8+JyfrvrUYMFBwmykVz3aUbgEncUBzbYNd3gf3QeBl GuzHblBcl0pHb3tUZMQTk/fU+88eLgx59uB++3axxI29X/kWtHSIypyo3NYm5CfchE 3HmCouqzkQAkRl0AOZU60bMh/9WPSfooPWaa7D+NdAFF26jxYv7/mgo4kbfMHPz9gh v60aSkqdz7qx07i+IeishQDnQRAIBVh6E/S+9MEg496syVTFQzzyR+kVcrZOR+256I UpsqUtXgVOixvOwqjtOmjpyS3lrM01aiQUYA/1uf8yg7njNu7j7ihw5OWmfdj/iNfe YNVUkJsqLY09w== Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2025 11:27:15 -0800 From: "Darrick J. Wong" To: Greg KH Cc: xfs-stable@lists.linux.dev, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, syzbot+3126ab3db03db42e7a31@syzkaller.appspotmail.com, eflorac@intellique.com, hch@lst.de, cem@kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCHSET RFC 6.12] xfs: bug fixes for 6.12.y LTS Message-ID: <20250207192715.GU21799@frogsfrogsfrogs> References: <173869499323.410229.9898612619797978336.stgit@frogsfrogsfrogs> <2025020556-bagful-cosmos-2a72@gregkh> <20250205155634.GG21808@frogsfrogsfrogs> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250205155634.GG21808@frogsfrogsfrogs> On Wed, Feb 05, 2025 at 07:56:34AM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > On Wed, Feb 05, 2025 at 06:55:19AM +0100, Greg KH wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 04, 2025 at 10:51:15AM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Here's a bunch of bespoke hand-ported bug fixes for 6.12 LTS. > > > > > > If you're going to start using this code, I strongly recommend pulling > > > from my git trees, which are linked below. > > > > > > With a bit of luck, this should all go splendidly. > > > Comments and questions are, as always, welcome. > > > > Should we take these into the next stable release, or do you want us to > > wait a bit? > > Let's wait a day or two to see if anyone has objections, and then I'll > send this series again without the RFC tag. Already I think I see that > the first patch needs a cc:stable tag to capture the version. Ok, it's been three days and nobody objected. I'll send a proper patchset with backports shortly. --D > --D > > > thanks, > > > > greg k-h > > >