public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>,
	Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/12] xfs: remove xfs_buf_is_vmapped
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2025 09:02:35 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250226170235.GO6242@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250226155245.513494-5-hch@lst.de>

On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 07:51:32AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> No need to look at the page count if we can simply call is_vmalloc_addr
> on bp->b_addr.  This prepares for eventualy removing the b_page_count
> field.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

Yeah, that's more direct.
Reviewed-by: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>

--D

> ---
>  fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c | 20 +++-----------------
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
> index ee678e13d9bd..af1389ebdd69 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
> @@ -60,20 +60,6 @@ static inline bool xfs_buf_is_uncached(struct xfs_buf *bp)
>  	return bp->b_rhash_key == XFS_BUF_DADDR_NULL;
>  }
>  
> -static inline int
> -xfs_buf_is_vmapped(
> -	struct xfs_buf	*bp)
> -{
> -	/*
> -	 * Return true if the buffer is vmapped.
> -	 *
> -	 * b_addr is null if the buffer is not mapped, but the code is clever
> -	 * enough to know it doesn't have to map a single page, so the check has
> -	 * to be both for b_addr and bp->b_page_count > 1.
> -	 */
> -	return bp->b_addr && bp->b_page_count > 1;
> -}
> -
>  static inline int
>  xfs_buf_vmap_len(
>  	struct xfs_buf	*bp)
> @@ -270,7 +256,7 @@ xfs_buf_free_pages(
>  
>  	ASSERT(bp->b_flags & _XBF_PAGES);
>  
> -	if (xfs_buf_is_vmapped(bp))
> +	if (is_vmalloc_addr(bp->b_addr))
>  		vm_unmap_ram(bp->b_addr, bp->b_page_count);
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < bp->b_page_count; i++) {
> @@ -1361,7 +1347,7 @@ xfs_buf_ioend(
>  	trace_xfs_buf_iodone(bp, _RET_IP_);
>  
>  	if (bp->b_flags & XBF_READ) {
> -		if (!bp->b_error && xfs_buf_is_vmapped(bp))
> +		if (!bp->b_error && bp->b_addr && is_vmalloc_addr(bp->b_addr))
>  			invalidate_kernel_vmap_range(bp->b_addr,
>  					xfs_buf_vmap_len(bp));
>  		if (!bp->b_error && bp->b_ops)
> @@ -1533,7 +1519,7 @@ xfs_buf_submit_bio(
>  			__bio_add_page(bio, bp->b_pages[p], PAGE_SIZE, 0);
>  		bio->bi_iter.bi_size = size; /* limit to the actual size used */
>  
> -		if (xfs_buf_is_vmapped(bp))
> +		if (bp->b_addr && is_vmalloc_addr(bp->b_addr))
>  			flush_kernel_vmap_range(bp->b_addr,
>  					xfs_buf_vmap_len(bp));
>  	}
> -- 
> 2.45.2
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2025-02-26 17:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-26 15:51 use folios and vmalloc for buffer cache backing memory Christoph Hellwig
2025-02-26 15:51 ` [PATCH 01/12] xfs: unmapped buffer item size straddling mismatch Christoph Hellwig
2025-02-26 15:51 ` [PATCH 02/12] xfs: add a fast path to xfs_buf_zero when b_addr is set Christoph Hellwig
2025-02-26 17:00   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-26 15:51 ` [PATCH 03/12] xfs: remove xfs_buf.b_offset Christoph Hellwig
2025-02-26 17:00   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-26 15:51 ` [PATCH 04/12] xfs: remove xfs_buf_is_vmapped Christoph Hellwig
2025-02-26 17:02   ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2025-02-26 15:51 ` [PATCH 05/12] xfs: refactor backing memory allocations for buffers Christoph Hellwig
2025-02-26 17:08   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-26 15:51 ` [PATCH 06/12] xfs: remove the kmalloc to page allocator fallback Christoph Hellwig
2025-02-26 17:22   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-03-04 14:05     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-02-26 15:51 ` [PATCH 07/12] xfs: convert buffer cache to use high order folios Christoph Hellwig
2025-02-26 17:33   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-03-04 14:06     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-02-26 15:51 ` [PATCH 08/12] xfs: kill XBF_UNMAPPED Christoph Hellwig
2025-02-26 15:51 ` [PATCH 09/12] xfs: buffer items don't straddle pages anymore Christoph Hellwig
2025-02-26 15:51 ` [PATCH 10/12] xfs: use vmalloc instead of vm_map_area for buffer backing memory Christoph Hellwig
2025-02-26 18:02   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-03-04 14:10     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-02-26 15:51 ` [PATCH 11/12] xfs: cleanup mapping tmpfs folios into the buffer cache Christoph Hellwig
2025-02-26 17:39   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-03-04 14:11     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-02-26 15:51 ` [PATCH 12/12] xfs: trace what memory backs a buffer Christoph Hellwig
2025-02-26 16:45   ` Darrick J. Wong
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-03-05 14:05 use folios and vmalloc for buffer cache backing memory v2 Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-05 14:05 ` [PATCH 04/12] xfs: remove xfs_buf_is_vmapped Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-10 13:19 use folios and vmalloc for buffer cache backing memory v3 Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-10 13:19 ` [PATCH 04/12] xfs: remove xfs_buf_is_vmapped Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250226170235.GO6242@frogsfrogsfrogs \
    --to=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=cem@kernel.org \
    --cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox