public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>,
	Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/12] xfs: cleanup mapping tmpfs folios into the buffer cache
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2025 09:39:31 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250226173931.GS6242@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250226155245.513494-12-hch@lst.de>

On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 07:51:39AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Directly assign b_addr based on the tmpfs folios without a detour
> through pages, reuse the folio_put path used for non-tmpfs buffers
> and replace all references to pages in comments with folios.
> 
> Partially based on a patch from Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
>  fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c     |  6 ++----
>  fs/xfs/xfs_buf_mem.c | 34 ++++++++++------------------------
>  fs/xfs/xfs_buf_mem.h |  6 ++----
>  3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
> 

<snip>

> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf_mem.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf_mem.h
> index eed4a7b63232..67d525cc1513 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf_mem.h
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf_mem.h
> @@ -19,16 +19,14 @@ int xmbuf_alloc(struct xfs_mount *mp, const char *descr,
>  		struct xfs_buftarg **btpp);
>  void xmbuf_free(struct xfs_buftarg *btp);
>  
> -int xmbuf_map_page(struct xfs_buf *bp);
> -void xmbuf_unmap_page(struct xfs_buf *bp);
>  bool xmbuf_verify_daddr(struct xfs_buftarg *btp, xfs_daddr_t daddr);
>  void xmbuf_trans_bdetach(struct xfs_trans *tp, struct xfs_buf *bp);
>  int xmbuf_finalize(struct xfs_buf *bp);
>  #else
>  # define xfs_buftarg_is_mem(...)	(false)
> -# define xmbuf_map_page(...)		(-ENOMEM)
> -# define xmbuf_unmap_page(...)		((void)0)
>  # define xmbuf_verify_daddr(...)	(false)
>  #endif /* CONFIG_XFS_MEMORY_BUFS */
>  
> +int xmbuf_map_backing_mem(struct xfs_buf *bp);

Does this actually work if CONFIG_XFS_MEMORY_BUFS=n ?  I guess the
compiler will see:

	if (false)
		return xmbuf_map_backing_mem(bp);

and optimize it out, right?  But these subtleties make my eyes twitch.

--D

> +
>  #endif /* __XFS_BUF_MEM_H__ */
> -- 
> 2.45.2
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2025-02-26 17:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-26 15:51 use folios and vmalloc for buffer cache backing memory Christoph Hellwig
2025-02-26 15:51 ` [PATCH 01/12] xfs: unmapped buffer item size straddling mismatch Christoph Hellwig
2025-02-26 15:51 ` [PATCH 02/12] xfs: add a fast path to xfs_buf_zero when b_addr is set Christoph Hellwig
2025-02-26 17:00   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-26 15:51 ` [PATCH 03/12] xfs: remove xfs_buf.b_offset Christoph Hellwig
2025-02-26 17:00   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-26 15:51 ` [PATCH 04/12] xfs: remove xfs_buf_is_vmapped Christoph Hellwig
2025-02-26 17:02   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-26 15:51 ` [PATCH 05/12] xfs: refactor backing memory allocations for buffers Christoph Hellwig
2025-02-26 17:08   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-26 15:51 ` [PATCH 06/12] xfs: remove the kmalloc to page allocator fallback Christoph Hellwig
2025-02-26 17:22   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-03-04 14:05     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-02-26 15:51 ` [PATCH 07/12] xfs: convert buffer cache to use high order folios Christoph Hellwig
2025-02-26 17:33   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-03-04 14:06     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-02-26 15:51 ` [PATCH 08/12] xfs: kill XBF_UNMAPPED Christoph Hellwig
2025-02-26 15:51 ` [PATCH 09/12] xfs: buffer items don't straddle pages anymore Christoph Hellwig
2025-02-26 15:51 ` [PATCH 10/12] xfs: use vmalloc instead of vm_map_area for buffer backing memory Christoph Hellwig
2025-02-26 18:02   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-03-04 14:10     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-02-26 15:51 ` [PATCH 11/12] xfs: cleanup mapping tmpfs folios into the buffer cache Christoph Hellwig
2025-02-26 17:39   ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2025-03-04 14:11     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-02-26 15:51 ` [PATCH 12/12] xfs: trace what memory backs a buffer Christoph Hellwig
2025-02-26 16:45   ` Darrick J. Wong
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-03-05 14:05 use folios and vmalloc for buffer cache backing memory v2 Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-05 14:05 ` [PATCH 11/12] xfs: cleanup mapping tmpfs folios into the buffer cache Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-05 18:34   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-03-10 13:19 use folios and vmalloc for buffer cache backing memory v3 Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-10 13:19 ` [PATCH 11/12] xfs: cleanup mapping tmpfs folios into the buffer cache Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250226173931.GS6242@frogsfrogsfrogs \
    --to=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=cem@kernel.org \
    --cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox