From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>,
Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/12] xfs: remove the kmalloc to page allocator fallback
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2025 10:18:12 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250305181812.GI2803749@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250305140532.158563-7-hch@lst.de>
On Wed, Mar 05, 2025 at 07:05:23AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Since commit 59bb47985c1d ("mm, sl[aou]b: guarantee natural alignment
> for kmalloc(power-of-two)", kmalloc and friends guarantee that power of
> two sized allocations are naturally aligned. Limit our use of kmalloc
> for buffers to these power of two sizes and remove the fallback to
> the page allocator for this case, but keep a check in addition to
> trusting the slab allocator to get the alignment right.
>
> Also refactor the kmalloc path to reuse various calculations for the
> size and gfp flags.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
> fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
> index 18ec1c1fbca1..073246d4352f 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
> @@ -243,23 +243,23 @@ xfs_buf_free(
>
> static int
> xfs_buf_alloc_kmem(
> - struct xfs_buf *bp,
> - xfs_buf_flags_t flags)
> + struct xfs_buf *bp,
> + size_t size,
> + gfp_t gfp_mask)
> {
> - gfp_t gfp_mask = GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOLOCKDEP | __GFP_NOFAIL;
> - size_t size = BBTOB(bp->b_length);
> -
> - /* Assure zeroed buffer for non-read cases. */
> - if (!(flags & XBF_READ))
> - gfp_mask |= __GFP_ZERO;
> + ASSERT(is_power_of_2(size));
> + ASSERT(size < PAGE_SIZE);
>
> - bp->b_addr = kmalloc(size, gfp_mask);
> + bp->b_addr = kmalloc(size, gfp_mask | __GFP_NOFAIL);
> if (!bp->b_addr)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> - if (((unsigned long)(bp->b_addr + size - 1) & PAGE_MASK) !=
> - ((unsigned long)bp->b_addr & PAGE_MASK)) {
> - /* b_addr spans two pages - use alloc_page instead */
> + /*
> + * Slab guarantees that we get back naturally aligned allocations for
> + * power of two sizes. Keep this check as the canary in the coal mine
> + * if anything changes in slab.
> + */
> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!IS_ALIGNED((unsigned long)bp->b_addr, size))) {
> kfree(bp->b_addr);
> bp->b_addr = NULL;
> return -ENOMEM;
> @@ -300,18 +300,22 @@ xfs_buf_alloc_backing_mem(
> if (xfs_buftarg_is_mem(bp->b_target))
> return xmbuf_map_page(bp);
>
> - /*
> - * For buffers that fit entirely within a single page, first attempt to
> - * allocate the memory from the heap to minimise memory usage. If we
> - * can't get heap memory for these small buffers, we fall back to using
> - * the page allocator.
> - */
> - if (size < PAGE_SIZE && xfs_buf_alloc_kmem(new_bp, flags) == 0)
> - return 0;
> + /* Assure zeroed buffer for non-read cases. */
> + if (!(flags & XBF_READ))
> + gfp_mask |= __GFP_ZERO;
>
> if (flags & XBF_READ_AHEAD)
> gfp_mask |= __GFP_NORETRY;
>
> + /*
> + * For buffers smaller than PAGE_SIZE use a kmalloc allocation if that
> + * is properly aligned. The slab allocator now guarantees an aligned
> + * allocation for all power of two sizes, we matches most of the smaller
Same suggestion:
"...which matches most of the smaller than PAGE_SIZE buffers..."
as last time.
with the comment fixed,
Reviewed-by: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
--D
> + * than PAGE_SIZE buffers used by XFS.
> + */
> + if (size < PAGE_SIZE && is_power_of_2(size))
> + return xfs_buf_alloc_kmem(bp, size, gfp_mask);
> +
> /* Make sure that we have a page list */
> bp->b_page_count = DIV_ROUND_UP(size, PAGE_SIZE);
> if (bp->b_page_count <= XB_PAGES) {
> @@ -324,10 +328,6 @@ xfs_buf_alloc_backing_mem(
> }
> bp->b_flags |= _XBF_PAGES;
>
> - /* Assure zeroed buffer for non-read cases. */
> - if (!(flags & XBF_READ))
> - gfp_mask |= __GFP_ZERO;
> -
> /*
> * Bulk filling of pages can take multiple calls. Not filling the entire
> * array is not an allocation failure, so don't back off if we get at
> --
> 2.45.2
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-05 18:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-05 14:05 use folios and vmalloc for buffer cache backing memory v2 Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-05 14:05 ` [PATCH 01/12] xfs: unmapped buffer item size straddling mismatch Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-05 14:05 ` [PATCH 02/12] xfs: add a fast path to xfs_buf_zero when b_addr is set Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-05 14:05 ` [PATCH 03/12] xfs: remove xfs_buf.b_offset Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-05 14:05 ` [PATCH 04/12] xfs: remove xfs_buf_is_vmapped Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-05 14:05 ` [PATCH 05/12] xfs: refactor backing memory allocations for buffers Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-05 14:05 ` [PATCH 06/12] xfs: remove the kmalloc to page allocator fallback Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-05 18:18 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2025-03-05 23:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-05 21:02 ` Dave Chinner
2025-03-05 23:38 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-05 14:05 ` [PATCH 07/12] xfs: convert buffer cache to use high order folios Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-05 18:20 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-03-05 20:50 ` Dave Chinner
2025-03-05 23:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-10 13:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-05 14:05 ` [PATCH 08/12] xfs: kill XBF_UNMAPPED Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-05 14:05 ` [PATCH 09/12] xfs: buffer items don't straddle pages anymore Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-05 14:05 ` [PATCH 10/12] xfs: use vmalloc instead of vm_map_area for buffer backing memory Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-05 18:22 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-03-05 21:20 ` Dave Chinner
2025-03-05 22:54 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-03-05 23:28 ` Dave Chinner
2025-03-05 23:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-05 23:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-06 0:57 ` Dave Chinner
2025-03-06 1:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-05 14:05 ` [PATCH 11/12] xfs: cleanup mapping tmpfs folios into the buffer cache Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-05 18:34 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-03-05 14:05 ` [PATCH 12/12] xfs: trace what memory backs a buffer Christoph Hellwig
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-03-10 13:19 use folios and vmalloc for buffer cache backing memory v3 Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-10 13:19 ` [PATCH 06/12] xfs: remove the kmalloc to page allocator fallback Christoph Hellwig
2025-02-26 15:51 use folios and vmalloc for buffer cache backing memory Christoph Hellwig
2025-02-26 15:51 ` [PATCH 06/12] xfs: remove the kmalloc to page allocator fallback Christoph Hellwig
2025-02-26 17:22 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-03-04 14:05 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250305181812.GI2803749@frogsfrogsfrogs \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=cem@kernel.org \
--cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox