public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>,
	"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
	Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/12] xfs: convert buffer cache to use high order folios
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2025 00:33:42 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250305233342.GB613@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z8i5HSS1ppbtQiJc@dread.disaster.area>

On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 07:50:37AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> This may be one of the reasons why you don't see any change in real
> performance with 64kB directory blocks - we spend more time in
> folio allocation because of compaction overhead than we gain back
> from avoiding the use of vmapped buffers....
> 
> i.e.
> 	if (size > PAGE_SIZE) {
> 		if (!is_power_of_2(size))
> 			goto fallback;
> 		gfp_mask ~= __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM;
> 		gfp_mask |= __GFP_NORETRY;
> 	}
> 	folio = folio_alloc(gfp_mask, get_order(size));

I'll give it a try.


  reply	other threads:[~2025-03-05 23:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-05 14:05 use folios and vmalloc for buffer cache backing memory v2 Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-05 14:05 ` [PATCH 01/12] xfs: unmapped buffer item size straddling mismatch Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-05 14:05 ` [PATCH 02/12] xfs: add a fast path to xfs_buf_zero when b_addr is set Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-05 14:05 ` [PATCH 03/12] xfs: remove xfs_buf.b_offset Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-05 14:05 ` [PATCH 04/12] xfs: remove xfs_buf_is_vmapped Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-05 14:05 ` [PATCH 05/12] xfs: refactor backing memory allocations for buffers Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-05 14:05 ` [PATCH 06/12] xfs: remove the kmalloc to page allocator fallback Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-05 18:18   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-03-05 23:32     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-05 21:02   ` Dave Chinner
2025-03-05 23:38     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-05 14:05 ` [PATCH 07/12] xfs: convert buffer cache to use high order folios Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-05 18:20   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-03-05 20:50   ` Dave Chinner
2025-03-05 23:33     ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2025-03-10 13:18     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-05 14:05 ` [PATCH 08/12] xfs: kill XBF_UNMAPPED Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-05 14:05 ` [PATCH 09/12] xfs: buffer items don't straddle pages anymore Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-05 14:05 ` [PATCH 10/12] xfs: use vmalloc instead of vm_map_area for buffer backing memory Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-05 18:22   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-03-05 21:20   ` Dave Chinner
2025-03-05 22:54     ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-03-05 23:28       ` Dave Chinner
2025-03-05 23:45         ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-05 23:35     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-06  0:57       ` Dave Chinner
2025-03-06  1:40         ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-05 14:05 ` [PATCH 11/12] xfs: cleanup mapping tmpfs folios into the buffer cache Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-05 18:34   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-03-05 14:05 ` [PATCH 12/12] xfs: trace what memory backs a buffer Christoph Hellwig
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-03-10 13:19 use folios and vmalloc for buffer cache backing memory v3 Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-10 13:19 ` [PATCH 07/12] xfs: convert buffer cache to use high order folios Christoph Hellwig
2025-02-26 15:51 use folios and vmalloc for buffer cache backing memory Christoph Hellwig
2025-02-26 15:51 ` [PATCH 07/12] xfs: convert buffer cache to use high order folios Christoph Hellwig
2025-02-26 17:33   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-03-04 14:06     ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250305233342.GB613@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=cem@kernel.org \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox