public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
	Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>,
	linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
	Bo Liu <liubo03@inspur.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] iomap: fix inline data on buffered read
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2025 09:23:23 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250319082323.GA26665@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250319081730.GB26281@lst.de>

On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 09:17:30AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> I'd move the iomap_iter_advance into iomap_read_inline_data, just like
> we've pushed it down as far as possible elsewhere, e.g. something like
> the patch below.  Although with that having size and length puzzles
> me a bit, so maybe someone more familar with the code could figure
> out why we need both, how they can be different and either document
> or eliminate that.

... and this doesn't even compile because it breaks write_begin.
So we'll need to keep it in the caller, but maybe without the
goto and just do the plain advance on length?


  reply	other threads:[~2025-03-19  8:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-19  2:59 [PATCH -next] iomap: fix inline data on buffered read Gao Xiang
2025-03-19  8:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-19  8:23   ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2025-03-19  8:34     ` Gao Xiang
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-03-19  6:40 Bo Liu (刘波)-浪潮信息

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250319082323.GA26665@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=liubo03@inspur.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox