public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: "Nirjhar Roy (IBM)" <nirjhar.roy.lists@gmail.com>
Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, ritesh.list@gmail.com,
	ojaswin@linux.ibm.com, zlang@kernel.org, david@fromorbit.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/6] common/config: Introduce _exit wrapper around exit command
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2025 08:23:32 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250409152332.GP6283@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b7f56773095bea46c2b6d56c3d87197d900d9e2d.1744181682.git.nirjhar.roy.lists@gmail.com>

On Wed, Apr 09, 2025 at 07:00:51AM +0000, Nirjhar Roy (IBM) wrote:
> We should always set the value of status correctly when we are exiting.
> Else, "$?" might not give us the correct value.
> If we see the following trap
> handler registration in the check script:
> 
> if $OPTIONS_HAVE_SECTIONS; then
>      trap "_kill_seq; _summary; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15
> else
>      trap "_kill_seq; _wrapup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15
> fi
> 
> So, "exit 1" will exit the check script without setting the correct
> return value. I ran with the following local.config file:
> 
> [xfs_4k_valid]
> FSTYP=xfs
> TEST_DEV=/dev/loop0
> TEST_DIR=/mnt1/test
> SCRATCH_DEV=/dev/loop1
> SCRATCH_MNT=/mnt1/scratch
> 
> [xfs_4k_invalid]
> FSTYP=xfs
> TEST_DEV=/dev/loop0
> TEST_DIR=/mnt1/invalid_dir
> SCRATCH_DEV=/dev/loop1
> SCRATCH_MNT=/mnt1/scratch
> 
> This caused the init_rc() to catch the case of invalid _test_mount
> options. Although the check script correctly failed during the execution
> of the "xfs_4k_invalid" section, the return value was 0, i.e "echo $?"
> returned 0. This is because init_rc exits with "exit 1" without
> correctly setting the value of "status". IMO, the correct behavior
> should have been that "$?" should have been non-zero.
> 
> The next patch will replace exit with _exit.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nirjhar Roy (IBM) <nirjhar.roy.lists@gmail.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
> Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>

Looks good now,
Reviewed-by: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>

--D

> ---
>  common/config | 9 +++++++++
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/common/config b/common/config
> index 79bec87f..7dd78dbe 100644
> --- a/common/config
> +++ b/common/config
> @@ -96,6 +96,15 @@ export LOCAL_CONFIGURE_OPTIONS=${LOCAL_CONFIGURE_OPTIONS:=--enable-readline=yes}
>  
>  export RECREATE_TEST_DEV=${RECREATE_TEST_DEV:=false}
>  
> +# This functions sets the exit code to status and then exits. Don't use
> +# exit directly, as it might not set the value of "$status" correctly, which is
> +# used as an exit code in the trap handler routine set up by the check script.
> +_exit()
> +{
> +	test -n "$1" && status="$1"
> +	exit "$status"
> +}
> +
>  # Handle mkfs.$fstyp which does (or does not) require -f to overwrite
>  set_mkfs_prog_path_with_opts()
>  {
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2025-04-09 15:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-09  7:00 [PATCH v4 0/6] Minor cleanups in common/ Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2025-04-09  7:00 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] generic/749: Remove redundant sourcing of common/rc Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2025-04-09  7:00 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] generic/367: Remove redundant sourcing of common/config Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2025-04-09 15:21   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-04-09  7:00 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] check: Remove redundant _test_mount in check Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2025-04-09 15:21   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-04-09  7:00 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] check,common{rc,preamble}: Decouple init_rc() call from sourcing common/rc Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2025-04-09 15:22   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-04-09  7:00 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] common/config: Introduce _exit wrapper around exit command Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2025-04-09 15:23   ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2025-04-09  7:00 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] common: exit --> _exit Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2025-04-09 15:24   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-04-09 16:29     ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2025-04-10 14:31     ` Zorro Lang
2025-04-10 16:29       ` Darrick J. Wong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250409152332.GP6283@frogsfrogsfrogs \
    --to=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nirjhar.roy.lists@gmail.com \
    --cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=zlang@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox