From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F9D61EB1BA for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2025 16:47:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1744303642; cv=none; b=mS66k2QO7/ZsOS/r3M9t8mHmcMiXgB817wwdeuYczMkh7zwPqWXlGgZxJ3DEpThn+r/xudVPLFBvvGswnkrEUt9qAeIxOFXU1LPbF2pCxaqoTGyQcIw0QY3Dm170GIaQ7nnxV67P3YLK0dLrfXUC6ICXQG12YEm4HaxnPkLX4MY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1744303642; c=relaxed/simple; bh=s3RT6PW7I0yH6cPB5dghLP2D+Zy6UHDyI7ow2kg04eE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=vF1sVX/L9j/FWzM8UiUymocTeA0TmuCk2NLAnsr1ASJTnJ2cLig205CumUdJWieiFMLEpE2gKQ1puEgZn7Izg8s0L60S/QNiu29ofVEgrfpRypcCwxw/g/U9LI1ktzZqdWbHU3/meHTV9/aXMc6HM3OSgqklQhuDqyAEML0qRwg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=SjufzcD+; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="SjufzcD+" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C2006C4CEDD; Thu, 10 Apr 2025 16:47:21 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1744303641; bh=s3RT6PW7I0yH6cPB5dghLP2D+Zy6UHDyI7ow2kg04eE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=SjufzcD+CItodKn/XQVLedpV5s7HaG9LkT1Sn7CQNXAdJ6FZMl65HH2d1YZYi+z83 AIMHGcZ37JAcWd+7rFpuayVrxkHpAOTqTUWF8s2+7U4iEfmUDosaK3iuRCI5UU7F3R pr92+t6nXzgGQ8ZYqYvQsl0miOAaBgVspWnj5wu2ZECWgOnKBCjYux50t9Z/n7/9uX xslBB/DMfhIFV+ihuEUjsSV1Uk3OaSJaizbNMdBHbTie8YZJi4gnAdrZlX0AGV6PO9 XYwnMFRKyibJKphomJGDfiHceSn5DBpPzgpdvFTAkD8gZYeAZcR0xn/ynEpognqHJW qjW4/8J2BfkdQ== Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2025 09:47:21 -0700 From: "Darrick J. Wong" To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Andrey Albershteyn , Hans Holmberg , linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 33/45] xfs_mkfs: reflink conflicts with zoned file systems for now Message-ID: <20250410164721.GC6283@frogsfrogsfrogs> References: <20250409075557.3535745-1-hch@lst.de> <20250409075557.3535745-34-hch@lst.de> <20250409190000.GH6283@frogsfrogsfrogs> <20250410064631.GG31075@lst.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250410064631.GG31075@lst.de> On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 08:46:31AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Apr 09, 2025 at 12:00:00PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 09, 2025 at 09:55:36AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > Until GC is enhanced to not unshared reflinked blocks we better prohibit > > > this combination. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig > > > > ...or gc figures out how to do reflinked moves. Either way, > > That's what I mean with not unsharing. I can adjust the wording > if mine was too confusing, though. "Don't allow reflink until zonegc learns how to deal with shared extents." ? --D