From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
Cc: Catherine Hoang <catherine.hoang@oracle.com>,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, fstests@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] generic/765: fix a few issues
Date: Wed, 14 May 2025 08:38:11 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250514153811.GU25667@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52fc32f8-c518-434f-ae29-2e72238e7296@oracle.com>
On Wed, May 14, 2025 at 01:47:20PM +0100, John Garry wrote:
> On 14/05/2025 01:29, Catherine Hoang wrote:
> > From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
> >
> > Fix a few bugs in the single block atomic writes test, such as requiring
> > directio, using page size for the ext4 max bsize, and making sure we check
> > the max atomic write size.
> >
> > Cc: ritesh.list@gmail.com
> > Signed-off-by: Catherine Hoang <catherine.hoang@oracle.com>
> > Reviewed-by: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
> > ---
> > common/rc | 2 +-
> > tests/generic/765 | 4 ++--
> > 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/common/rc b/common/rc
> > index 657772e7..bc8dabc5 100644
> > --- a/common/rc
> > +++ b/common/rc
> > @@ -2989,7 +2989,7 @@ _require_xfs_io_command()
> > fi
> > if [ "$param" == "-A" ]; then
> > opts+=" -d"
> > - pwrite_opts+="-D -V 1 -b 4k"
> > + pwrite_opts+="-d -V 1 -b 4k"
>
> according to the documentation for -b, 4096 is the default (so I don't think
> that we need to set it explicitly). But is that flag even relevant to
> pwritev2?
The documentation is wrong -- on XFS the default is the fs blocksize.
Everywhere else is 4k.
> And setting -d in pwrite_opts means DIO for the input file, right? I am not
> sure if that is required.
It's not required, I mistook where that "-d" goes -- -d as an argument
to xfs_io is necessary, but -d as an argument to the pwrite subcommand
is not. It's also benign since we don't pass -i.
Curiously the version of this patch in my tree doesn't have the extra
-d... I wonder if I made that change and forgot to send it out.
--D
> > fi
> > testio=`$XFS_IO_PROG -f $opts -c \
> > "pwrite $pwrite_opts $param 0 4k" $testfile 2>&1`
> > diff --git a/tests/generic/765 b/tests/generic/765
> > index 9bab3b8a..8695a306 100755
> > --- a/tests/generic/765
> > +++ b/tests/generic/765
> > @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ get_supported_bsize()
> > ;;
> > "ext4")
> > min_bsize=1024
> > - max_bsize=4096
> > + max_bsize=$(_get_page_size)
>
> looks ok
>
> > ;;
> > *)
> > _notrun "$FSTYP does not support atomic writes"
> > @@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ test_atomic_writes()
> > # Check that atomic min/max = FS block size
> > test $file_min_write -eq $bsize || \
> > echo "atomic write min $file_min_write, should be fs block size $bsize"
> > - test $file_min_write -eq $bsize || \
> > + test $file_max_write -eq $bsize || \
>
> looks ok
>
> > echo "atomic write max $file_max_write, should be fs block size $bsize"
> > test $file_max_segments -eq 1 || \
> > echo "atomic write max segments $file_max_segments, should be 1"
>
>
> Thanks,
> John
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-14 15:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-14 0:29 [PATCH 0/6] atomic writes tests Catherine Hoang
2025-05-14 0:29 ` [PATCH 1/6] generic/765: fix a few issues Catherine Hoang
2025-05-14 12:47 ` John Garry
2025-05-14 15:38 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2025-05-14 23:42 ` Catherine Hoang
2025-05-15 1:47 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-05-15 8:16 ` John Garry
2025-05-15 14:54 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-05-15 17:57 ` John Garry
2025-05-15 21:50 ` Catherine Hoang
2025-05-16 6:59 ` John Garry
2025-05-17 3:17 ` Ritesh Harjani
2025-05-14 0:29 ` [PATCH 2/6] generic/765: adjust various things Catherine Hoang
2025-05-14 12:59 ` John Garry
2025-05-17 3:36 ` Ritesh Harjani
2025-05-14 0:29 ` [PATCH 3/6] generic/765: move common atomic write code to a library file Catherine Hoang
2025-05-14 13:00 ` John Garry
2025-05-17 3:49 ` Ritesh Harjani
2025-05-14 0:29 ` [PATCH 4/6] common/atomicwrites: adjust a few more things Catherine Hoang
2025-05-14 13:11 ` John Garry
2025-05-14 15:40 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-05-17 3:59 ` Ritesh Harjani
2025-05-14 0:29 ` [PATCH 5/6] common/atomicwrites: fix _require_scratch_write_atomic Catherine Hoang
2025-05-14 13:14 ` John Garry
2025-05-14 0:29 ` [PATCH 6/6] generic: various atomic write tests with scsi_debug Catherine Hoang
2025-05-14 13:41 ` John Garry
2025-05-14 16:01 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-05-14 16:30 ` John Garry
2025-05-14 23:49 ` Catherine Hoang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250514153811.GU25667@frogsfrogsfrogs \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=catherine.hoang@oracle.com \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).