linux-xfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: alexjlzheng@gmail.com
To: brauner@kernel.org, djwong@kernel.org, hch@infradead.org,
	willy@infradead.org
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Jinliang Zheng <alexjlzheng@tencent.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] iomap: avoid unnecessary ifs_set_range_uptodate() with locks
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2025 16:12:07 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250711081207.1782667-1-alexjlzheng@tencent.com> (raw)

From: Jinliang Zheng <alexjlzheng@tencent.com>

In the buffer write path, iomap_set_range_uptodate() is called every
time iomap_end_write() is called. But if folio_test_uptodate() holds, we
know that all blocks in this folio are already in the uptodate state, so
there is no need to go deep into the critical section of state_lock to
execute bitmap_set().

This is because the folios always creep towards ifs_is_fully_uptodate()
state and once they've gotten there folio_mark_uptodate() is called, which
means the folio is uptodate.

Then once a folio is uptodate, there is no route back to !uptodate without
going through the removal of the folio from the page cache. Therefore, it's
fine to use folio_test_uptodate() to short-circuit unnecessary code paths.

Although state_lock may not have significant lock contention due to
folio lock, this patch at least reduces the number of instructions,
especially the expensive lock-prefixed instructions.

Signed-off-by: Jinliang Zheng <alexjlzheng@tencent.com>
Reviewed-by: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
---
Changelog:

V2: Update commit message

V1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-xfs/20250701144847.12752-1-alexjlzheng@tencent.com/
---
 fs/iomap/buffered-io.c | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
index 3729391a18f3..fb4519158f3a 100644
--- a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
+++ b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
@@ -71,6 +71,9 @@ static void iomap_set_range_uptodate(struct folio *folio, size_t off,
 	unsigned long flags;
 	bool uptodate = true;
 
+	if (folio_test_uptodate(folio))
+		return;
+
 	if (ifs) {
 		spin_lock_irqsave(&ifs->state_lock, flags);
 		uptodate = ifs_set_range_uptodate(folio, ifs, off, len);
-- 
2.49.0


             reply	other threads:[~2025-07-11  8:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-11  8:12 alexjlzheng [this message]
2025-07-11  8:13 ` [PATCH v2] iomap: avoid unnecessary ifs_set_range_uptodate() with locks Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250711081207.1782667-1-alexjlzheng@tencent.com \
    --to=alexjlzheng@gmail.com \
    --cc=alexjlzheng@tencent.com \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).