Linux XFS filesystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
Cc: hch@lst.de, cem@kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: disallow atomic writes on DAX
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2025 09:02:55 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250717160255.GP2672049@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250717151900.1362655-1-john.g.garry@oracle.com>

On Thu, Jul 17, 2025 at 03:19:00PM +0000, John Garry wrote:
> Atomic writes are not currently supported for DAX, but two problems exist:
> - we may go down DAX write path for IOCB_ATOMIC, which does not handle
>   IOCB_ATOMIC properly
> - we report non-zero atomic write limits in statx (for DAX inodes)
> 
> We may want atomic writes support on DAX in future, but just disallow for
> now.
> 
> For this, ensure when IOCB_ATOMIC is set that we check the write size
> versus the atomic write min and max before branching off to the DAX write
> path. This is not strictly required for DAX, as we should not get this far
> in the write path as FMODE_CAN_ATOMIC_WRITE should not be set.
> 
> In addition, due to reflink being supported for DAX, we automatically get
> CoW-based atomic writes support being advertised. Remedy this by
> disallowing atomic writes for a DAX inode for both sw and hw modes.

...because it's fsdax and who's really going to test/use software atomic
writes there ?

> Finally make atomic write size and DAX mount always mutually exclusive.

Why?  You could have a rt-on-pmem filesystem with S_DAX files, and still
want to do atomic writes to files on the data device.

> Reported-by: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
> Fixes: 9dffc58f2384 ("xfs: update atomic write limits")
> Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
> index db21b5a4b881..84876f41da93 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
> @@ -1102,9 +1102,6 @@ xfs_file_write_iter(
>  	if (xfs_is_shutdown(ip->i_mount))
>  		return -EIO;
>  
> -	if (IS_DAX(inode))
> -		return xfs_file_dax_write(iocb, from);
> -
>  	if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_ATOMIC) {
>  		if (ocount < xfs_get_atomic_write_min(ip))
>  			return -EINVAL;
> @@ -1117,6 +1114,9 @@ xfs_file_write_iter(
>  			return ret;
>  	}
>  
> +	if (IS_DAX(inode))
> +		return xfs_file_dax_write(iocb, from);
> +
>  	if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_DIRECT) {
>  		/*
>  		 * Allow a directio write to fall back to a buffered
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h
> index 07fbdcc4cbf5..b142cd4f446a 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h
> @@ -356,11 +356,22 @@ static inline bool xfs_inode_has_bigrtalloc(const struct xfs_inode *ip)
>  	(XFS_IS_REALTIME_INODE(ip) ? \
>  		(ip)->i_mount->m_rtdev_targp : (ip)->i_mount->m_ddev_targp)
>  
> -static inline bool xfs_inode_can_hw_atomic_write(const struct xfs_inode *ip)
> +static inline bool xfs_inode_can_hw_atomic_write(struct xfs_inode *ip)

Why drop const here?  VFS_IC() should be sufficient, I think.

--D

>  {
> +	if (IS_DAX(VFS_I(ip)))
> +		return false;
> +
>  	return xfs_inode_buftarg(ip)->bt_awu_max > 0;
>  }
>  
> +static inline bool xfs_inode_can_sw_atomic_write(struct xfs_inode *ip)
> +{
> +	if (IS_DAX(VFS_I(ip)))
> +		return false;
> +
> +	return xfs_can_sw_atomic_write(ip->i_mount);
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * In-core inode flags.
>   */
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c
> index 01e597290eb5..b39a19dbc386 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c
> @@ -616,7 +616,8 @@ xfs_get_atomic_write_min(
>  	 * write of exactly one single fsblock if the bdev will make that
>  	 * guarantee for us.
>  	 */
> -	if (xfs_inode_can_hw_atomic_write(ip) || xfs_can_sw_atomic_write(mp))
> +	if (xfs_inode_can_hw_atomic_write(ip) ||
> +	    xfs_inode_can_sw_atomic_write(ip))
>  		return mp->m_sb.sb_blocksize;
>  
>  	return 0;
> @@ -633,7 +634,7 @@ xfs_get_atomic_write_max(
>  	 * write of exactly one single fsblock if the bdev will make that
>  	 * guarantee for us.
>  	 */
> -	if (!xfs_can_sw_atomic_write(mp)) {
> +	if (!xfs_inode_can_sw_atomic_write(ip)) {
>  		if (xfs_inode_can_hw_atomic_write(ip))
>  			return mp->m_sb.sb_blocksize;
>  		return 0;
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c
> index 0b690bc119d7..6a5543e08198 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c
> @@ -745,6 +745,12 @@ xfs_set_max_atomic_write_opt(
>  
>  	ASSERT(max_write <= U32_MAX);
>  
> +	if (xfs_has_dax_always(mp)) {
> +		xfs_warn(mp,
> + "atomic writes not supported for DAX");
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
>  	/* generic_atomic_write_valid enforces power of two length */
>  	if (!is_power_of_2(new_max_bytes)) {
>  		xfs_warn(mp,
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.h
> index 97de44c32272..3c858b42a54a 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.h
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.h
> @@ -474,11 +474,6 @@ static inline bool xfs_has_nonzoned(const struct xfs_mount *mp)
>  	return !xfs_has_zoned(mp);
>  }
>  
> -static inline bool xfs_can_sw_atomic_write(struct xfs_mount *mp)
> -{
> -	return xfs_has_reflink(mp);
> -}
> -
>  /*
>   * Some features are always on for v5 file systems, allow the compiler to
>   * eliminiate dead code when building without v4 support.
> @@ -534,6 +529,14 @@ __XFS_HAS_FEAT(dax_never, DAX_NEVER)
>  __XFS_HAS_FEAT(norecovery, NORECOVERY)
>  __XFS_HAS_FEAT(nouuid, NOUUID)
>  
> +static inline bool xfs_can_sw_atomic_write(struct xfs_mount *mp)
> +{
> +	if (xfs_has_dax_always(mp))
> +		return false;
> +
> +	return xfs_has_reflink(mp);
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * Operational mount state flags
>   *
> -- 
> 2.43.5
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2025-07-17 16:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-17 15:19 [PATCH] xfs: disallow atomic writes on DAX John Garry
2025-07-17 16:02 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2025-07-18  8:15   ` John Garry
2025-07-18 19:38     ` Darrick J. Wong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250717160255.GP2672049@frogsfrogsfrogs \
    --to=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=cem@kernel.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox