From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>, cen zhang <zzzccc427@gmail.com>,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] xfs: remove XFS_IBULK_SAME_AG
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2025 09:21:23 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250723162123.GY2672049@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250723122011.3178474-3-hch@lst.de>
On Wed, Jul 23, 2025 at 02:19:45PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Add a new field to struct xfs_ibulk to directly pass XFS_IWALK* flags,
> and thus remove the need to indirect the SAME_AG flag through
> XFS_IBULK*.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Yeah, that clears things up :)
Reviewed-by: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
--D
> ---
> fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c | 2 +-
> fs/xfs/xfs_itable.c | 12 ++----------
> fs/xfs/xfs_itable.h | 10 ++++------
> 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c
> index fe1f74a3b6a3..e1051a530a50 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c
> @@ -219,7 +219,7 @@ xfs_bulk_ireq_setup(
> else if (XFS_INO_TO_AGNO(mp, breq->startino) < hdr->agno)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - breq->flags |= XFS_IBULK_SAME_AG;
> + breq->iwalk_flags |= XFS_IWALK_SAME_AG;
>
> /* Asking for an inode past the end of the AG? We're done! */
> if (XFS_INO_TO_AGNO(mp, breq->startino) > hdr->agno)
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_itable.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_itable.c
> index 5116842420b2..2aa37a4d2706 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_itable.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_itable.c
> @@ -307,7 +307,6 @@ xfs_bulkstat(
> .breq = breq,
> };
> struct xfs_trans *tp;
> - unsigned int iwalk_flags = 0;
> int error;
>
> if (breq->idmap != &nop_mnt_idmap) {
> @@ -328,10 +327,7 @@ xfs_bulkstat(
> * locking abilities to detect cycles in the inobt without deadlocking.
> */
> tp = xfs_trans_alloc_empty(breq->mp);
> - if (breq->flags & XFS_IBULK_SAME_AG)
> - iwalk_flags |= XFS_IWALK_SAME_AG;
> -
> - error = xfs_iwalk(breq->mp, tp, breq->startino, iwalk_flags,
> + error = xfs_iwalk(breq->mp, tp, breq->startino, breq->iwalk_flags,
> xfs_bulkstat_iwalk, breq->icount, &bc);
> xfs_trans_cancel(tp);
> kfree(bc.buf);
> @@ -447,21 +443,17 @@ xfs_inumbers(
> .breq = breq,
> };
> struct xfs_trans *tp;
> - unsigned int iwalk_flags = 0;
> int error = 0;
>
> if (xfs_bulkstat_already_done(breq->mp, breq->startino))
> return 0;
>
> - if (breq->flags & XFS_IBULK_SAME_AG)
> - iwalk_flags |= XFS_IWALK_SAME_AG;
> -
> /*
> * Grab an empty transaction so that we can use its recursive buffer
> * locking abilities to detect cycles in the inobt without deadlocking.
> */
> tp = xfs_trans_alloc_empty(breq->mp);
> - error = xfs_inobt_walk(breq->mp, tp, breq->startino, iwalk_flags,
> + error = xfs_inobt_walk(breq->mp, tp, breq->startino, breq->iwalk_flags,
> xfs_inumbers_walk, breq->icount, &ic);
> xfs_trans_cancel(tp);
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_itable.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_itable.h
> index f10e8f8f2335..2d0612f14d6e 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_itable.h
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_itable.h
> @@ -13,17 +13,15 @@ struct xfs_ibulk {
> xfs_ino_t startino; /* start with this inode */
> unsigned int icount; /* number of elements in ubuffer */
> unsigned int ocount; /* number of records returned */
> - unsigned int flags; /* see XFS_IBULK_FLAG_* */
> + unsigned int flags; /* XFS_IBULK_FLAG_* */
> + unsigned int iwalk_flags; /* XFS_IWALK_FLAG_* */
> };
>
> -/* Only iterate within the same AG as startino */
> -#define XFS_IBULK_SAME_AG (1U << 0)
> -
> /* Fill out the bs_extents64 field if set. */
> -#define XFS_IBULK_NREXT64 (1U << 1)
> +#define XFS_IBULK_NREXT64 (1U << 0)
>
> /* Signal that we can return metadata directories. */
> -#define XFS_IBULK_METADIR (1U << 2)
> +#define XFS_IBULK_METADIR (1U << 1)
>
> /*
> * Advance the user buffer pointer by one record of the given size. If the
> --
> 2.47.2
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-23 16:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-23 12:19 fix XFS_IBULK_* vs XFS_IWALK_* confusion Christoph Hellwig
2025-07-23 12:19 ` [PATCH 1/2] xfs: fully decouple XFS_IBULK* flags from XFS_IWALK* flags Christoph Hellwig
2025-07-23 16:20 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-08-05 9:23 ` Carlos Maiolino
2025-07-23 12:19 ` [PATCH 2/2] xfs: remove XFS_IBULK_SAME_AG Christoph Hellwig
2025-07-23 16:21 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2025-08-12 7:33 ` fix XFS_IBULK_* vs XFS_IWALK_* confusion Carlos Maiolino
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250723162123.GY2672049@frogsfrogsfrogs \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=cem@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zzzccc427@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).