From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: "Nirjhar Roy (IBM)" <nirjhar.roy.lists@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, ritesh.list@gmail.com,
ojaswin@linux.ibm.com, bfoster@redhat.com, david@fromorbit.com,
hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/3] xfs: Re-introduce xg_active_wq field in struct xfs_group
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2025 13:26:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250729202632.GF2672049@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <70c065f02299e09b1569c3bc45ff493c9ac55fda.1752746805.git.nirjhar.roy.lists@gmail.com>
On Thu, Jul 17, 2025 at 04:00:43PM +0530, Nirjhar Roy (IBM) wrote:
> pag_active_wq was removed in
> commit 9943b4573290
> ("xfs: remove the unused pag_active_wq field in struct xfs_perag")
> because it was not waited upon. Re-introducing this in struct xfs_group.
> This patch also replaces atomic_dec() in xfs_group_rele() with
>
> if (atomic_dec_and_test(&xg->xg_active_ref))
> wake_up(&xg->xg_active_wq);
>
> The reason for this change is that the online shrink code will wait
> for all the active references to come down to zero before actually
> starting the shrink process (only if the number of blocks that
> we are trying to remove is worth 1 or more AGs).
...and I guess this is the start of being able to remove live rtgroups
too?
> Signed-off-by: Nirjhar Roy (IBM) <nirjhar.roy.lists@gmail.com>
> ---
> fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_group.c | 4 +++-
> fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_group.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_group.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_group.c
> index e9d76bcdc820..1fe5319de338 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_group.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_group.c
> @@ -147,7 +147,8 @@ xfs_group_rele(
> struct xfs_group *xg)
> {
> trace_xfs_group_rele(xg, _RET_IP_);
> - atomic_dec(&xg->xg_active_ref);
> + if (atomic_dec_and_test(&xg->xg_active_ref))
> + wake_up(&xg->xg_active_wq);
> }
>
> void
> @@ -198,6 +199,7 @@ xfs_group_insert(
> xfs_defer_drain_init(&xg->xg_intents_drain);
>
> /* Active ref owned by mount indicates group is online. */
> + init_waitqueue_head(&xg->xg_active_wq);
> atomic_set(&xg->xg_active_ref, 1);
>
> error = xa_insert(&mp->m_groups[type].xa, index, xg, GFP_KERNEL);
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_group.h b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_group.h
> index 4423932a2313..dbef389ef838 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_group.h
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_group.h
> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ struct xfs_group {
> enum xfs_group_type xg_type;
> atomic_t xg_ref; /* passive reference count */
> atomic_t xg_active_ref; /* active reference count */
> + wait_queue_head_t xg_active_wq; /* woken active_ref falls to zero */
Nit: tab between the ^ variable and its type.
With that fixed,
Reviewed-by: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
--D
>
> /* Precalculated geometry info */
> uint32_t xg_block_count; /* max usable gbno */
> --
> 2.43.5
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-29 20:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-17 10:30 [RFC 0/3] xfs: Add support to shrink multiple empty AGs Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2025-07-17 10:30 ` [RFC 1/3] xfs: Re-introduce xg_active_wq field in struct xfs_group Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2025-07-29 20:26 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2025-07-30 6:14 ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2025-07-17 10:30 ` [RFC 2/3] xfs: Refactoring the nagcount and delta calculation Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2025-07-29 20:24 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-07-30 5:04 ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2025-07-17 10:30 ` [RFC 3/3] xfs: Add support to shrink multiple empty AGs Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2025-07-29 21:05 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-07-30 18:36 ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2025-08-12 19:07 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-08-13 8:04 ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2025-08-14 18:31 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-08-19 5:56 ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2025-07-30 4:55 ` Ritesh Harjani
2025-07-30 11:53 ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250729202632.GF2672049@frogsfrogsfrogs \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nirjhar.roy.lists@gmail.com \
--cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).