From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: cem@kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: implement XFS_IOC_DIOINFO in terms of vfs_getattr
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2025 13:47:25 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250818204725.GX7965@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250818051348.1486572-1-hch@lst.de>
On Mon, Aug 18, 2025 at 07:13:43AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Use the direct I/O alignment reporting from ->getattr instead of
> reimplementing it. This exposes the relaxation of the memory
> alignment in the XFS_IOC_DIOINFO info and ensure the information will
> stay in sync. Note that randholes.c in xfstests has a bug where it
> incorrectly fails when the required memory alignment is smaller than the
> pointer size. Round up the reported value as there is a fair chance that
> this code got copied into various applications.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
> fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c | 21 ++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c
> index e1051a530a50..21ae68896caa 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c
> @@ -1209,21 +1209,24 @@ xfs_file_ioctl(
> current->comm);
> return -ENOTTY;
> case XFS_IOC_DIOINFO: {
> - struct xfs_buftarg *target = xfs_inode_buftarg(ip);
> + struct kstat st;
> struct dioattr da;
>
> - da.d_mem = target->bt_logical_sectorsize;
> + error = vfs_getattr(&filp->f_path, &st, STATX_DIOALIGN, 0);
> + if (error)
> + return error;
>
> /*
> - * See xfs_report_dioalign() for an explanation about why this
> - * reports a value larger than the sector size for COW inodes.
> + * The randholes tool in xfstests expects the alignment to not
> + * be smaller than the size of a pointer for whatever reason.
Userspace is grossssss
But I do see the value in not having two implementations of the directio
geometry gathering since we already had bugs wrt that vs. statx.
Reviewed-by: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
--D
> + *
> + * Align the report value to that so that the dword (4 byte)
> + * alignment supported by many storage devices doesn't trip it
> + * up.
> */
> - if (xfs_is_cow_inode(ip))
> - da.d_miniosz = xfs_inode_alloc_unitsize(ip);
> - else
> - da.d_miniosz = target->bt_logical_sectorsize;
> + da.d_mem = roundup(st.dio_mem_align, sizeof(void *));
> + da.d_miniosz = st.dio_offset_align;
> da.d_maxiosz = INT_MAX & ~(da.d_miniosz - 1);
> -
> if (copy_to_user(arg, &da, sizeof(da)))
> return -EFAULT;
> return 0;
> --
> 2.47.2
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-18 20:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <9aG8Tf3X2d-4A9_uy7q50gPfuQH-xjOf3Bdbw4mJ5ITHbBXXDwYG2uqAYoSKE-pRy5iYgqRbd79paOGW-Sk_SA==@protonmail.internalid>
2025-08-18 5:13 ` [PATCH] xfs: implement XFS_IOC_DIOINFO in terms of vfs_getattr Christoph Hellwig
2025-08-18 20:47 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2025-08-20 8:23 ` Carlos Maiolino
2025-08-21 8:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-08-21 10:59 ` Carlos Maiolino
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250818204725.GX7965@frogsfrogsfrogs \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=cem@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).