From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AEBD136CDF3 for ; Wed, 20 Aug 2025 15:25:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1755703553; cv=none; b=pagPNxb/OpQiFwKuuJlJcGxlAenLVfoLIlXBKFbANz6oXzug+D+Wh2EKWE0/cpUrT1kQVdNvheIfDiO2l0PQJFC93X69yZ+zl6CGEJE/qmrwRJO5UiKveg87zlH/Q5PYv9oa5rBOxb9AzF1AHHC//bN/3l+6iL/TBubrxnw3ZTI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1755703553; c=relaxed/simple; bh=R9alDJNi3S9evUljS+b07Jjju41HZO2HOVzmSL6mx5g=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=bcSucwQuApYBOYB4ZZupi2jGh0pDtQSCPmoHJlx/7wh/bSze+l3+j7Iedppm79GLCVWrwwYa7cU2RNj4vmTcdEn6TwI/ArGQpcmyakE02WPVZHn4E1E1xgBoSoIfJe+FFdC8HsTtMybbhMxBqKXJbmxHUpoIL1dQmtzK8WhduRM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=UzkTlGwy; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="UzkTlGwy" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 37CDCC4CEE7; Wed, 20 Aug 2025 15:25:53 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1755703553; bh=R9alDJNi3S9evUljS+b07Jjju41HZO2HOVzmSL6mx5g=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=UzkTlGwyzlkwC4yNWr7U1lp1j2pckDPXd3UNal1sbSkTRuK2EkQfufC6RpWvIc7Sc 2tSr0alu+4qkeL5e8A1lF7ENJHwt+3olNrAcI7pSRs1frqLdhetbpROtKl8/6jTYFf R1RbokIeDg8sDEsjGxieY0c7ROoZyha408Lk45fqMDS+8UzeDmwc6eTHOJLFYDx4Ki b6gb9sOyUO9GxZ+fsM8dJQw/UwSvvc4bzbRLoHZOoCL/B5Uc1L7jZ/CkFYJJr7mzwz iKxOEj6LzDkEJh1oTacqIexfZvjvYBJB5iiCMrxA96/YZIgtSNjDPgj8ivOiM/xMRH aHpxmgPR3ebvw== Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2025 08:25:52 -0700 From: "Darrick J. Wong" To: Carlos Maiolino Cc: Andrey Albershteyn , Chandan Babu R , Zorro Lang , xfs Subject: Re: Yearly maintainership rotation? Message-ID: <20250820152552.GD7965@frogsfrogsfrogs> References: <20250819225400.GB7965@frogsfrogsfrogs> <7svscwa3oy5oxavscjgapcvr7lbumsntu32fq7uhmrfqr6pino@7awm4hxzzqzb> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7svscwa3oy5oxavscjgapcvr7lbumsntu32fq7uhmrfqr6pino@7awm4hxzzqzb> On Wed, Aug 20, 2025 at 10:07:02AM +0200, Carlos Maiolino wrote: > On Tue, Aug 19, 2025 at 03:54:00PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > > Now that it's nearly September again, what do you all think about > > rotating release managers? Chandan has told me that he'd be willing to > > step into maintaining upstream xfsprogs; what do the rest of you think > > about that? > > > > Also, does anyone want to tackle fstests? :D > > Considering you were specific about xfxsprogs and fstests, I believe > you excluded kernel on purpose, but anyway, from my side I'm pretty ok > with how things are now, and I'd rather keep it as-is, specially because > I'm enjoying the role :-) I specifically mentioned xfsprogs because Chandan volunteered, and fstests because Zorro has been maintaining that for a very long time. It's fine if everyone wants to keep going as they are now, but positive re-affirmation once a year feels (to a longtime maintainer like me, anyway) like a face-saving way to give people an offramp if they decide to take it. IOWs, I think it best to help the maintainers avoid burnout. > Of course I'm talking about my side and my workload only, I don't speak > for Andrey or Zorro. No rush, you all have plenty of time to give things a good thinking through. :) --D > Carlos > > > > > --D > > >