Linux XFS filesystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, jack@suse.cz, lherbolt@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] xfs: rearrange code in xfs_inode_item_precommit
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2025 15:49:06 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250918224906.GL8096@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250917222446.1329304-2-david@fromorbit.com>

On Thu, Sep 18, 2025 at 08:12:53AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> 
> There are similar extsize checks and updates done inside and outside
> the inode item lock, which could all be done under a single top
> level logic branch outside the ili_lock. The COW extsize fixup can
> potentially miss updating the XFS_ILOG_CORE in ili_fsync_fields, so
> moving this code up above the ili_fsync_fields update could also be
> considered a fix.
> 
> Further, to make the next change a bit cleaner, move where we
> calculate the on-disk flag mask to after we attach the cluster
> buffer to the the inode log item.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> ---
>  fs/xfs/xfs_inode_item.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
>  1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode_item.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode_item.c
> index afb6cadf7793..318e7c68ec72 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode_item.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode_item.c
> @@ -131,46 +131,28 @@ xfs_inode_item_precommit(
>  	}
>  
>  	/*
> -	 * Inode verifiers do not check that the extent size hint is an integer
> -	 * multiple of the rt extent size on a directory with both rtinherit
> -	 * and extszinherit flags set.  If we're logging a directory that is
> -	 * misconfigured in this way, clear the hint.
> +	 * Inode verifiers do not check that the extent size hints are an
> +	 * integer multiple of the rt extent size on a directory with
> +	 * rtinherit flags set.  If we're logging a directory that is
> +	 * misconfigured in this way, clear the bad hints.
>  	 */
> -	if ((ip->i_diflags & XFS_DIFLAG_RTINHERIT) &&
> -	    (ip->i_diflags & XFS_DIFLAG_EXTSZINHERIT) &&
> -	    xfs_extlen_to_rtxmod(ip->i_mount, ip->i_extsize) > 0) {
> -		ip->i_diflags &= ~(XFS_DIFLAG_EXTSIZE |
> -				   XFS_DIFLAG_EXTSZINHERIT);
> -		ip->i_extsize = 0;
> -		flags |= XFS_ILOG_CORE;
> +	if (ip->i_diflags & XFS_DIFLAG_RTINHERIT) {
> +		if ((ip->i_diflags & XFS_DIFLAG_EXTSZINHERIT) &&
> +		    xfs_extlen_to_rtxmod(ip->i_mount, ip->i_extsize) > 0) {
> +			ip->i_diflags &= ~(XFS_DIFLAG_EXTSIZE |
> +					   XFS_DIFLAG_EXTSZINHERIT);
> +			ip->i_extsize = 0;
> +			flags |= XFS_ILOG_CORE;
> +		}
> +		if ((ip->i_diflags2 & XFS_DIFLAG2_COWEXTSIZE) &&
> +		    xfs_extlen_to_rtxmod(ip->i_mount, ip->i_cowextsize) > 0) {
> +			ip->i_diflags2 &= ~XFS_DIFLAG2_COWEXTSIZE;
> +			ip->i_cowextsize = 0;
> +			flags |= XFS_ILOG_CORE;
> +		}
>  	}

Hrm, yeah, that cowextsize fixing code looks like it was merged in the
wrong place or something.  In theory it's a bug fix, but since we never
merged support for rtreflink and rtextsize > 1fsb this will never happen
in practice since rtextsize cannot change when reflink is enabled.

Reviewed-by: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>

--D


>  
> -	/*
> -	 * Record the specific change for fdatasync optimisation. This allows
> -	 * fdatasync to skip log forces for inodes that are only timestamp
> -	 * dirty. Once we've processed the XFS_ILOG_IVERSION flag, convert it
> -	 * to XFS_ILOG_CORE so that the actual on-disk dirty tracking
> -	 * (ili_fields) correctly tracks that the version has changed.
> -	 */
>  	spin_lock(&iip->ili_lock);
> -	iip->ili_fsync_fields |= (flags & ~XFS_ILOG_IVERSION);
> -	if (flags & XFS_ILOG_IVERSION)
> -		flags = ((flags & ~XFS_ILOG_IVERSION) | XFS_ILOG_CORE);
> -
> -	/*
> -	 * Inode verifiers do not check that the CoW extent size hint is an
> -	 * integer multiple of the rt extent size on a directory with both
> -	 * rtinherit and cowextsize flags set.  If we're logging a directory
> -	 * that is misconfigured in this way, clear the hint.
> -	 */
> -	if ((ip->i_diflags & XFS_DIFLAG_RTINHERIT) &&
> -	    (ip->i_diflags2 & XFS_DIFLAG2_COWEXTSIZE) &&
> -	    xfs_extlen_to_rtxmod(ip->i_mount, ip->i_cowextsize) > 0) {
> -		ip->i_diflags2 &= ~XFS_DIFLAG2_COWEXTSIZE;
> -		ip->i_cowextsize = 0;
> -		flags |= XFS_ILOG_CORE;
> -	}
> -
>  	if (!iip->ili_item.li_buf) {
>  		struct xfs_buf	*bp;
>  		int		error;
> @@ -204,6 +186,17 @@ xfs_inode_item_precommit(
>  		xfs_trans_brelse(tp, bp);
>  	}
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * Record the specific change for fdatasync optimisation. This allows
> +	 * fdatasync to skip log forces for inodes that are only timestamp
> +	 * dirty. Once we've processed the XFS_ILOG_IVERSION flag, convert it
> +	 * to XFS_ILOG_CORE so that the actual on-disk dirty tracking
> +	 * (ili_fields) correctly tracks that the version has changed.
> +	 */
> +	iip->ili_fsync_fields |= (flags & ~XFS_ILOG_IVERSION);
> +	if (flags & XFS_ILOG_IVERSION)
> +		flags = ((flags & ~XFS_ILOG_IVERSION) | XFS_ILOG_CORE);
> +
>  	/*
>  	 * Always OR in the bits from the ili_last_fields field.  This is to
>  	 * coordinate with the xfs_iflush() and xfs_buf_inode_iodone() routines
> -- 
> 2.50.1
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2025-09-18 22:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-17 22:12 [PATCH 0/2] xfs: reduce ILOCK contention on O_DSYNC DIO Dave Chinner
2025-09-17 22:12 ` [PATCH 1/2] xfs: rearrange code in xfs_inode_item_precommit Dave Chinner
2025-09-18 22:49   ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2025-09-19 15:19   ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-09-19 16:08     ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-09-22 18:12       ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-09-17 22:12 ` [PATCH 2/2] xfs: rework datasync tracking and execution Dave Chinner
2025-09-19 15:30   ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-09-23 12:12     ` Carlos Maiolino
2025-09-23 13:51 ` [PATCH 0/2] xfs: reduce ILOCK contention on O_DSYNC DIO Carlos Maiolino

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250918224906.GL8096@frogsfrogsfrogs \
    --to=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=lherbolt@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox