From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Andrey Albershteyn <aalbersh@redhat.com>
Cc: xfs <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: regressions in xfs/633 and xfs/437?
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2025 10:09:15 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250923170915.GT8096@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <conkiyr3ppcjq6j3pwgkrbvakvvez5h4wixrmmjh2c2pmhazhd@f7jqzxdhpmvi>
On Mon, Sep 22, 2025 at 06:11:27PM +0200, Andrey Albershteyn wrote:
> On 2025-09-22 08:29:54, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > Hey folks,
> >
> > Have any of you noticed a recent regression in xfs/437 and xfs/633?
> >
> > --- /run/fstests/bin/tests/xfs/437.out 2025-07-15 14:41:40.303420629 -0700
> > +++ /var/tmp/fstests/xfs/437.out.bad 2025-09-21 18:53:36.368250642 -0700
> > @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
> > QA output created by 437
> > Silence is golden.
> > +mkfs/proto.c:1428: error = libxfs_iget(mp, NULL, dst_ino, 0, &ip);
> >
> > --- /var/tmp/fstests/xfs/633.out.bad
> > +++ /dev/fd/63 2025-09-21 17:45:58.431935255 -0700
> > @@ -1,6 +1,107468 @@
> > QA output created by 633
> > Format and populate
> > Recover filesystem
> > +./common/xfs: line 335: 326611 Segmentation fault (core dumped) $XFS_DB_PROG "$@" $(_scratch_xfs_db_options)
> > +./common/xfs: line 335: 326617 Segmentation fault (core dumped) $XFS_DB_PROG "$@" $(_scratch_xfs_db_options)
> > Check file contents
> > +--- /tmp/326192.stat.before 2025-09-21 17:36:10.071959154 -0700
> > ++++ /tmp/326192.stat.after 2025-09-21 17:36:12.863959041 -0700
> > +@@ -1,23 +1,3 @@
> > +-11a4 0:0 0 0 fifo 0 1731556303 ./S_IFIFO
> > +-2000 0:0 0 0 character special file 0 1758501368 ./newfiles/p0/d1/c19
> > +-2000 0:0 0 0 character special file 0 1758501368 ./newfiles/p0/d1/c1a
> > <snip>
> >
> > The xfs/437 failure is trivially fixable, not sure what's causing the
> > segfault here? Probably something in the new file_{get,set}attr code in
> > xfs_db is my guess...?
> >
> > MKFS_OPTIONS -- -f -m metadir=1,autofsck=1,uquota,gquota,pquota, -n size=8k, /dev/sdf
> > MOUNT_OPTIONS -- /dev/sdf /opt
> >
> > (note that both problems happen on a variety of different
> > configurations)
> >
> > --D
> >
>
> I haven't seen this, thanks, will look into it
I'll send some fixes shortly.
--D
> --
> - Andrey
>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-23 17:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-22 15:29 regressions in xfs/633 and xfs/437? Darrick J. Wong
2025-09-22 16:11 ` Andrey Albershteyn
2025-09-23 17:09 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250923170915.GT8096@frogsfrogsfrogs \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=aalbersh@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox