linux-xfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>
Cc: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>,
	Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com>,
	fstests@vger.kernel.org, Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@gmail.com>,
	john.g.garry@oracle.com, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] xfs: fix write failures in software-provided atomic writes
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2025 11:11:32 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251029181132.GH3356773@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c3a040b249485b02b569b9269b649d02d721d995.1758264169.git.ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>

From: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>

With the 5 Oct 2025 release of fstests, generic/521 fails for me on
regular (aka non-block-atomic-writes) storage:

QA output created by 521
dowrite: write: Input/output error
LOG DUMP (8553 total operations):
1(  1 mod 256): SKIPPED (no operation)
2(  2 mod 256): WRITE    0x7e000 thru 0x8dfff	(0x10000 bytes) HOLE
3(  3 mod 256): READ     0x69000 thru 0x79fff	(0x11000 bytes)
4(  4 mod 256): FALLOC   0x53c38 thru 0x5e853	(0xac1b bytes) INTERIOR
5(  5 mod 256): COPY 0x55000 thru 0x59fff	(0x5000 bytes) to 0x25000 thru 0x29fff
6(  6 mod 256): WRITE    0x74000 thru 0x88fff	(0x15000 bytes)
7(  7 mod 256): ZERO     0xedb1 thru 0x11693	(0x28e3 bytes)
<snip>

with a warning in dmesg from iomap about XFS trying to give it a
delalloc mapping for a directio write.  Fix the software atomic write
iomap_begin code to convert the reservation into a written mapping.
This doesn't fix the data corruption problems reported by generic/760,
but it's a start.

Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.16
Fixes: bd1d2c21d5d249 ("xfs: add xfs_atomic_write_cow_iomap_begin()")
Signed-off-by: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
---
 fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c |   21 +++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
index d3f6e3e42a1191..e1da06b157cf94 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
@@ -1130,7 +1130,7 @@ xfs_atomic_write_cow_iomap_begin(
 		return -EAGAIN;
 
 	trace_xfs_iomap_atomic_write_cow(ip, offset, length);
-
+retry:
 	xfs_ilock(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL);
 
 	if (!ip->i_cowfp) {
@@ -1141,6 +1141,8 @@ xfs_atomic_write_cow_iomap_begin(
 	if (!xfs_iext_lookup_extent(ip, ip->i_cowfp, offset_fsb, &icur, &cmap))
 		cmap.br_startoff = end_fsb;
 	if (cmap.br_startoff <= offset_fsb) {
+		if (isnullstartblock(cmap.br_startblock))
+			goto convert;
 		xfs_trim_extent(&cmap, offset_fsb, count_fsb);
 		goto found;
 	}
@@ -1169,8 +1171,10 @@ xfs_atomic_write_cow_iomap_begin(
 	if (!xfs_iext_lookup_extent(ip, ip->i_cowfp, offset_fsb, &icur, &cmap))
 		cmap.br_startoff = end_fsb;
 	if (cmap.br_startoff <= offset_fsb) {
-		xfs_trim_extent(&cmap, offset_fsb, count_fsb);
 		xfs_trans_cancel(tp);
+		if (isnullstartblock(cmap.br_startblock))
+			goto convert;
+		xfs_trim_extent(&cmap, offset_fsb, count_fsb);
 		goto found;
 	}
 
@@ -1210,6 +1214,19 @@ xfs_atomic_write_cow_iomap_begin(
 	xfs_iunlock(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL);
 	return xfs_bmbt_to_iomap(ip, iomap, &cmap, flags, IOMAP_F_SHARED, seq);
 
+convert:
+	xfs_iunlock(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL);
+	error = xfs_bmapi_convert_delalloc(ip, XFS_COW_FORK, offset, iomap,
+			NULL);
+	if (error)
+		return error;
+
+	/*
+	 * Try the lookup again, because the delalloc conversion might have
+	 * turned the COW mapping into unwritten, but we need it to be in
+	 * written state.
+	 */
+	goto retry;
 out_unlock:
 	xfs_iunlock(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL);
 	return error;

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-10-29 18:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-19  6:47 [PATCH v7 00/11] Add more tests for multi fs block atomic writes Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-09-19  6:47 ` [PATCH v7 01/12] common/rc: Add _min() and _max() helpers Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-09-19  6:47 ` [PATCH v7 02/12] common/rc: Add fio atomic write helpers Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-09-19 16:27   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-09-19  6:47 ` [PATCH v7 03/12] common/rc: Add a helper to run fsx on a given file Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-09-19  6:47 ` [PATCH v7 04/12] ltp/fsx.c: Add atomic writes support to fsx Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-09-28  8:55   ` Zorro Lang
2025-09-28 13:19   ` Zorro Lang
2025-10-02 17:56     ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-10-03 17:19       ` Zorro Lang
2025-10-05 12:57         ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-10-05 15:39           ` Zorro Lang
2025-10-06 13:20             ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-10-07  9:58               ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-10-17 16:01                 ` Zorro Lang
2025-10-17 16:27                   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-10-17 18:47                     ` Zorro Lang
2025-10-17 22:52                       ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-10-20 10:33               ` John Garry
2025-10-21 10:28                 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-10-21 11:30                   ` Brian Foster
2025-10-21 11:58                     ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-10-21 17:44                       ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-10-22  7:40                         ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-10-23 15:44                           ` John Garry
2025-10-23 17:55                             ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-10-29 18:11   ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2025-10-29 18:13     ` [PATCH] xfs: fix write failures in software-provided atomic writes Darrick J. Wong
2025-10-30 13:52     ` John Garry
2025-10-30 15:01       ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-10-30 16:35         ` John Garry
2025-10-30 19:38           ` John Garry
2025-10-31  4:30             ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-10-31 10:17               ` John Garry
2025-10-31 17:13                 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-11-03 12:16                   ` John Garry
2025-11-03 18:01                     ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-10-31  8:08             ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-10-31 10:04               ` John Garry
2025-09-19  6:47 ` [PATCH v7 05/12] generic: Add atomic write test using fio crc check verifier Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-10-28  9:42   ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-11-01  9:00     ` Zorro Lang
2025-09-19  6:47 ` [PATCH v7 06/12] generic: Add atomic write test using fio verify on file mixed mappings Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-09-19  6:48 ` [PATCH v7 07/12] generic: Add atomic write multi-fsblock O_[D]SYNC tests Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-09-19  6:48 ` [PATCH v7 08/12] generic: Stress fsx with atomic writes enabled Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-09-19  6:48 ` [PATCH v7 09/12] generic: Add sudden shutdown tests for multi block atomic writes Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-09-19  6:48 ` [PATCH v7 10/12] ext4: Test atomic write and ioend codepaths with bigalloc Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-09-19  6:48 ` [PATCH v7 11/12] ext4: Test atomic writes allocation and write " Ojaswin Mujoo
2025-09-19  6:48 ` [PATCH v7 12/12] ext4: Atomic write test for extent split across leaf nodes Ojaswin Mujoo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251029181132.GH3356773@frogsfrogsfrogs \
    --to=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=cem@kernel.org \
    --cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=zlang@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).