linux-xfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] xfs: set lv_bytes in xlog_write_one_vec
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2025 17:04:09 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251101000409.GR3356773@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251030144946.1372887-3-hch@lst.de>

On Thu, Oct 30, 2025 at 03:49:12PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> lv_bytes is mostly just use by the CIL code, but has crept into the
> low-level log writing code to decide on a full or partial iclog
> write.  Ensure it is valid even for the special log writes that don't
> go through the CIL by initializing it in xlog_write_one_vec.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
>  fs/xfs/xfs_log.c | 5 +++--
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_log.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_log.c
> index ed83a0e3578e..382c55f4d8d2 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_log.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_log.c
> @@ -858,14 +858,15 @@ xlog_write_one_vec(
>  	struct xfs_log_vec	lv = {
>  		.lv_niovecs	= 1,
>  		.lv_iovecp	= reg,
> +		.lv_bytes	= reg->i_len,

I'm surprised that nothing's noticed the zero lv_bytes, but I guess
unmount and commit record writes have always wanted a full write anyway?

Question: if lv_bytes is no longer zero, can this fall into the
xlog_write_partial branch?

--D

>  	};
>  	LIST_HEAD		(lv_chain);
>  
>  	/* account for space used by record data */
> -	ticket->t_curr_res -= reg->i_len;
> +	ticket->t_curr_res -= lv.lv_bytes;
>  
>  	list_add(&lv.lv_list, &lv_chain);
> -	return xlog_write(log, ctx, &lv_chain, ticket, reg->i_len);
> +	return xlog_write(log, ctx, &lv_chain, ticket, lv.lv_bytes);
>  }
>  
>  /*
> -- 
> 2.47.3
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2025-11-01  0:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-30 14:49 cleanup log item formatting v2 Christoph Hellwig
2025-10-30 14:49 ` [PATCH 01/10] xfs: add a xlog_write_one_vec helper Christoph Hellwig
2025-10-31 23:59   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-10-30 14:49 ` [PATCH 02/10] xfs: set lv_bytes in xlog_write_one_vec Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-01  0:04   ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2025-11-03 10:43     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-04 23:39       ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-11-05 13:27         ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-05 22:13       ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-10-30 14:49 ` [PATCH 03/10] xfs: improve the ->iop_format interface Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-01  0:15   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-10-30 14:49 ` [PATCH 04/10] xfs: move struct xfs_log_iovec to xfs_log_priv.h Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-01  1:16   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-10-30 14:49 ` [PATCH 05/10] xfs: move struct xfs_log_vec " Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-01  1:16   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-10-30 14:49 ` [PATCH 06/10] xfs: regularize iclog space accounting in xlog_write_partial Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-04 23:53   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-11-05 13:27     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-10-30 14:49 ` [PATCH 07/10] xfs: improve the calling convention for the xlog_write helpers Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-01  3:26   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-11-03 10:46     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-04 23:40       ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-11-05 13:28         ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-10-30 14:49 ` [PATCH 08/10] xfs: add a xlog_write_space_left helper Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-01  3:27   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-10-30 14:49 ` [PATCH 09/10] xfs: improve the iclog space assert in xlog_write_iovec Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-04 23:45   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-10-30 14:49 ` [PATCH 10/10] xfs: factor out a xlog_write_space_advance helper Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-04 23:46   ` Darrick J. Wong
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-11-12 12:14 cleanup log item formatting v3 Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-12 12:14 ` [PATCH 02/10] xfs: set lv_bytes in xlog_write_one_vec Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-14 16:55   ` Darrick J. Wong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251101000409.GR3356773@frogsfrogsfrogs \
    --to=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=cem@kernel.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).