From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] xfs: set lv_bytes in xlog_write_one_vec
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2025 11:43:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251103104318.GA9158@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251101000409.GR3356773@frogsfrogsfrogs>
On Fri, Oct 31, 2025 at 05:04:09PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_log.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_log.c
> > index ed83a0e3578e..382c55f4d8d2 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_log.c
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_log.c
> > @@ -858,14 +858,15 @@ xlog_write_one_vec(
> > struct xfs_log_vec lv = {
> > .lv_niovecs = 1,
> > .lv_iovecp = reg,
> > + .lv_bytes = reg->i_len,
>
> I'm surprised that nothing's noticed the zero lv_bytes, but I guess
> unmount and commit record writes have always wanted a full write anyway?
>
> Question: if lv_bytes is no longer zero, can this fall into the
> xlog_write_partial branch?
The unmount format is smaller than an opheader, so we won't split it
because of that, but unless I'm misreading things it could fix a bug
where we'd not get a new iclog when needed for it otherwise?
The commit record is just an an opheader without any payload, so there
is no way to even split it in theory.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-03 10:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-30 14:49 cleanup log item formatting v2 Christoph Hellwig
2025-10-30 14:49 ` [PATCH 01/10] xfs: add a xlog_write_one_vec helper Christoph Hellwig
2025-10-31 23:59 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-10-30 14:49 ` [PATCH 02/10] xfs: set lv_bytes in xlog_write_one_vec Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-01 0:04 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-11-03 10:43 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2025-11-04 23:39 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-11-05 13:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-05 22:13 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-10-30 14:49 ` [PATCH 03/10] xfs: improve the ->iop_format interface Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-01 0:15 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-10-30 14:49 ` [PATCH 04/10] xfs: move struct xfs_log_iovec to xfs_log_priv.h Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-01 1:16 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-10-30 14:49 ` [PATCH 05/10] xfs: move struct xfs_log_vec " Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-01 1:16 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-10-30 14:49 ` [PATCH 06/10] xfs: regularize iclog space accounting in xlog_write_partial Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-04 23:53 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-11-05 13:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-10-30 14:49 ` [PATCH 07/10] xfs: improve the calling convention for the xlog_write helpers Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-01 3:26 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-11-03 10:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-04 23:40 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-11-05 13:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-10-30 14:49 ` [PATCH 08/10] xfs: add a xlog_write_space_left helper Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-01 3:27 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-10-30 14:49 ` [PATCH 09/10] xfs: improve the iclog space assert in xlog_write_iovec Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-04 23:45 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-10-30 14:49 ` [PATCH 10/10] xfs: factor out a xlog_write_space_advance helper Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-04 23:46 ` Darrick J. Wong
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-11-12 12:14 cleanup log item formatting v3 Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-12 12:14 ` [PATCH 02/10] xfs: set lv_bytes in xlog_write_one_vec Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-14 16:55 ` Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251103104318.GA9158@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=cem@kernel.org \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).