From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtpbgsg2.qq.com (smtpbgsg2.qq.com [54.254.200.128]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C77021FF47; Tue, 4 Nov 2025 09:36:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=54.254.200.128 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1762248974; cv=none; b=tEFHKRn9av+DO5qz3MN3yAMUm23843sxZVFAWg7q997Evt8gEXA2EeleqRWZAs2wV2KGWhpvGqljwH1y1oJnSoeaOwjxU8cvnMrG5y1UWBDZwx4PkeZrHfMPfR9v5jsdGbmfIxTiyY4fq7y8+BAvhUGkDB4wUkl/GBuAj0eO33I= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1762248974; c=relaxed/simple; bh=dRUGXfYeACsEaLRPUhjJcWbtimfoTFK+PgSLMNC6gUs=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:MIME-Version; b=tdXoJrsyNSJHPITDr7kXHoEsHrETpC+Jrr5T47zLk/lt5ALJpiW55yS6LEnWQ7fuLw5djU0uitwQ0tGObmKyvSjPi3IRBWCPQo1oaC3TuRzdcRinYraQu7JwUJbBKAoL1I4+tti651ZkeTtflYG7C2rp/aPKr7+ahdvNgVStvD0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=uniontech.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=uniontech.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=uniontech.com header.i=@uniontech.com header.b=EYEiNM3E; arc=none smtp.client-ip=54.254.200.128 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=uniontech.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=uniontech.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=uniontech.com header.i=@uniontech.com header.b="EYEiNM3E" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=uniontech.com; s=onoh2408; t=1762248931; bh=jmGhMAgaBUM0BajBlocMSy6qJhGOcjmpM0oQwDNPRRM=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-Id:MIME-Version; b=EYEiNM3EoYmJd9jFxYUQ2cUaTYEifLxpT01cFNWoMVirWK02PdAR3jEq/GJojFDWN V9Z98w87s+h72UfKKAN2gHDQwr0EyyVUqd2UQ0clEpDogdDaYfh2WNj5Zu+vP1Mcj4 bsuDhcPyrr3/lL+Y5uDhWYDaVXZeRMqK7QTR8cQg= X-QQ-mid: zesmtpsz4t1762248911t51d15bed X-QQ-Originating-IP: se3KyUxOOCabbjx22pKi04RZr2zGRV6ZOgOzhQpzaeA= Received: from localhost.localdomain ( [1.85.7.34]) by bizesmtp.qq.com (ESMTP) with id ; Tue, 04 Nov 2025 17:35:09 +0800 (CST) X-QQ-SSF: 0000000000000000000000000000000 X-QQ-GoodBg: 1 X-BIZMAIL-ID: 5451745896443902141 EX-QQ-RecipientCnt: 7 From: Gou Hao To: cem@kernel.org, corbet@lwn.net Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gouhaojake@163.com, guanwentao@uniontech.com Subject: [PATCH] xfs-doc: Fix typo error Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2025 17:34:06 +0800 Message-Id: <20251104093406.9135-1-gouhao@uniontech.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-QQ-SENDSIZE: 520 Feedback-ID: zesmtpsz:uniontech.com:qybglogicsvrgz:qybglogicsvrgz7a-0 X-QQ-XMAILINFO: OAv5WZ8gfM/qx/hcYtFNWbd0ImY6K/x+CvPrjM5EzVpWaOT0G4KLkSFq ulaQWkeAdK1fj9fXyF0Z5fsYMti9RCzlJ0bj5lB9mG+gufL1OsXiirLjn0P01M+D5oE9Hnb tW2kIldyIQqryrxNd/VG4Nmr+fiEehBbRe1lB7aEexDNlCi10BweTaCEkd9G4wZc1J5yZXO 6Z7bG5en7M/NFrP1YTCWCgR4XQpnhBccsGRGcHkwYieG0yp9BFkSLqctAzqa6Jw56Kfe/Gh qJ8Xt9/6WT9TU3HAbbhEEY5BQrDSUgsz4WD9dOEv1VdmMvTUqh/f91LPC2/BTpNNYsuZPF3 BnWalk0TCuZMwdF5M/RhrZwmgo1rQTjC6GcBUUUb8I11Ss8tIRd3OGx5ewJFXuKFi84Wfoo 2ppV9LA1QYvtpjAqk6L3QYwb8J+GIi2J/n/+R1Q2UcXLbKLE8YDO2LLVSzoKTCjAQ1G/KAE 6JRGQhyd4NYgspjnRY5RRNLGyj+eRRj7+C+36IkXPc3OrDIiVifjUe1Xk82h2lArXbaU/4z QUdXRA3SreA6aObq8KpzKS/9LDPSNlbAwNBHo88B0WOB7WD4cZN64Y5ZW++9t6KxpSgjxw0 pswK3uIaue8Bo/RA7mRKJD2lcHiiQ1/kVc38R64DeeKJJ8QgqJMp/fJiLEMb4DEczSQNOIV hzeNjUOlsbwJvPI5unLXJy4QI3gJtrBQbjc0TRpOM7wpgQRwFr/B8OE10Z6Myyu2vm1Z5gZ X64+D3w2IurLNsC9H5iStCX9TDAPOO5e/M5ISgOb3rD7lCv/ch5tbyi57o0XHQF+dAdtVim AZk/pSuPdr2+1CmU3+Ji0LDN7HUtujrUzujZ+M9RagDUaY0a9hzE3hfdAZYNXcFh2ANY5Fy Z87SfI0vRZvDWDO/zToj4Ot1uUhpImuv6dsENTW1uvoGLITlRCr+iCynzLtUKN4G9WdMNkL KimjVrZ/FgcpB53giFE5P6OWfu1WSBpMQ3votbZMWt18JjM8T80tgX5RepVTIBspMQe5kIE jH0+b4C71HsRZ5Jp118sXX8hm+26dgrwW+sIRGwW1p4h6NGLy2bWJKNfdWsK63A9vqJigKG +9RFBdVH8bIwvvYm0WYB99IDOh/n5G5/w== X-QQ-XMRINFO: M/715EihBoGSf6IYSX1iLFg= X-QQ-RECHKSPAM: 0 online fsck may take longer than offline fsck... Signed-off-by: Gou Hao --- Documentation/filesystems/xfs/xfs-online-fsck-design.rst | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/xfs/xfs-online-fsck-design.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/xfs/xfs-online-fsck-design.rst index 8cbcd3c26434..55e727b5f12e 100644 --- a/Documentation/filesystems/xfs/xfs-online-fsck-design.rst +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/xfs/xfs-online-fsck-design.rst @@ -249,7 +249,7 @@ sharing and lock acquisition rules as the regular filesystem. This means that scrub cannot take *any* shortcuts to save time, because doing so could lead to concurrency problems. In other words, online fsck is not a complete replacement for offline fsck, and -a complete run of online fsck may take longer than online fsck. +a complete run of online fsck may take longer than offline fsck. However, both of these limitations are acceptable tradeoffs to satisfy the different motivations of online fsck, which are to **minimize system downtime** and to **increase predictability of operation**. -- 2.20.1