public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Zorro Lang <zlang@kernel.org>, Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>,
	Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>,
	fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/12] xfs/185: don't use SCRATCH_{,RT}DEV helpers
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2025 12:02:48 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251210200248.GG94594@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251210054831.3469261-8-hch@lst.de>

On Wed, Dec 10, 2025 at 06:46:53AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> This tests creates loop-based data and rt devices for testing.  Don't
> override SCRATCH_{,RT}DEV and don't use the helpers based on it because
> the options specified in MKFS_OPTIONS might not work for this
> configuration.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
>  tests/xfs/185 | 15 +++------------
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tests/xfs/185 b/tests/xfs/185
> index 7aceb383ce46..84139be8e66e 100755
> --- a/tests/xfs/185
> +++ b/tests/xfs/185
<snip>
> @@ -64,16 +63,8 @@ rtminor=$(stat -c '%T' "$rtloop")
>  test $ddmajor -le $rtmajor || \
>  	_notrun "Data loopdev minor $ddminor larger than rt minor $rtminor"
>  
> -# Inject our custom-built devices as an rt-capable scratch device.
> -# We avoid touching "require_scratch" so that post-test fsck will not try to
> -# run on our synthesized scratch device.
> -old_use_external="$USE_EXTERNAL"
> -USE_EXTERNAL=yes
> -SCRATCH_RTDEV="$rtloop"
> -SCRATCH_DEV="$ddloop"
> -
> -_scratch_mkfs >> $seqres.full
> -_try_scratch_mount >> $seqres.full || \
> +$MKFS_XFS_PROG -r rtdev=$rtloop $ddloop  >> $seqres.full
> +mount -o rtdev=$rtloop $ddloop $SCRATCH_MNT >> $seqres.full || \
>  	_notrun "mount with injected rt device failed"

What happens if SCRATCH_LOGDEV is set?  I guess we ignore it, and
everything is good?  I suppose the logdev configuration isn't really
relevant here anyway.

If the answers are 'nothing' and 'yes' then
Reviewed-by: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>

--D

>  # Create a file that we'll use to seed fsmap entries for the rt device,
> -- 
> 2.47.3
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2025-12-10 20:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-12-10  5:46 stop overriding SCRATCH_{,LOG,RT}DEV Christoph Hellwig
2025-12-10  5:46 ` [PATCH 01/12] dmflakey: override SCRATCH_DEV in _init_flakey Christoph Hellwig
2025-12-10  5:46 ` [PATCH 02/12] ext4/006: call e2fsck directly Christoph Hellwig
2025-12-10 19:32   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-12-11  4:52     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-12-10  5:46 ` [PATCH 03/12] common: add a _check_dev_fs helper Christoph Hellwig
2025-12-10 23:24   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-12-10  5:46 ` [PATCH 04/12] ext4/032: use _check_dev_fs Christoph Hellwig
2025-12-10 23:24   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-12-10  5:46 ` [PATCH 05/12] generic/590: split XFS RT specific bits out Christoph Hellwig
2025-12-10 22:51   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-12-10  5:46 ` [PATCH 06/12] xfs/157: don't override SCRATCH_{,LOG,RT}DEV Christoph Hellwig
2025-12-10 20:05   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-12-10  5:46 ` [PATCH 07/12] xfs/185: don't use SCRATCH_{,RT}DEV helpers Christoph Hellwig
2025-12-10 20:02   ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2025-12-11  5:00     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-12-10  5:46 ` [PATCH 08/12] xfs/424: don't use SCRATCH_DEV helpers Christoph Hellwig
2025-12-10 19:55   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-12-10  5:46 ` [PATCH 09/12] xfs/521: require a real SCRATCH_RTDEV Christoph Hellwig
2025-12-10 19:54   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-12-11  4:58     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-12-10  5:46 ` [PATCH 10/12] xfs/528: " Christoph Hellwig
2025-12-10 19:52   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-12-11  4:57     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-12-10  5:46 ` [PATCH 11/12] xfs/530: " Christoph Hellwig
2025-12-10 19:49   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-12-11  4:55     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-12-12 20:00       ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-12-10  5:46 ` [PATCH 12/12] xfs/650: " Christoph Hellwig
2025-12-10 19:45   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-12-10 22:50     ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-12-11  4:54       ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251210200248.GG94594@frogsfrogsfrogs \
    --to=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=anand.jain@oracle.com \
    --cc=fdmanana@suse.com \
    --cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=zlang@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox