public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	cem@kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] xfs: fix XFS_ERRTAG_FORCE_ZERO_RANGE for zoned file system
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2025 06:28:03 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251219052803.GA29788@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aUGrpyS6BG0CD-kn@bfoster>

On Tue, Dec 16, 2025 at 01:57:43PM -0500, Brian Foster wrote:
> > +	if (xfs_is_zoned_inode(ip)) {
> > +		if (ac->reserved_blocks > XFS_ZONED_ZERO_EDGE_SPACE_RES) {
> > +			ASSERT(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_XFS_DEBUG));
> 
> JFYI the reason I suggested a config check was as a safeguard against
> forced zeroing on production kernels. The assert here would compile out
> in that case, so won't necessarily provide that benefit (unless you
> wanted to use ASSERT_ALWAYS() or WARN() or something..).
> 
> A warning on WARN && !DEBUG is still useful so I don't really care if
> you leave it as is or tweak it. I just wanted to point that out.

I really think that anyone who modidifies this area should run a debug
kernel to test.  And if they the usual automated runs will catch it.
Having allocation beahvior modified based on CONFIG_XFS_DEBUG, and only
for a case that isn't supposed to happen seems weird and in would cause
weird heisenbugs if it ever hit.


  reply	other threads:[~2025-12-19  5:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <P_OCd7pNcLvRe038VeBLKmIi6KSgitIcPVyjn56Ucs9A34-ckTtKbjGP08W5TLKsAjB8PriOequE0_FNUOny-Q==@protonmail.internalid>
2025-12-15  6:05 ` [PATCH v2] xfs: fix XFS_ERRTAG_FORCE_ZERO_RANGE for zoned file system Christoph Hellwig
2025-12-16  8:03   ` Carlos Maiolino
2025-12-16  8:06     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-12-16  8:11       ` Carlos Maiolino
2025-12-16 15:54         ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-12-16 17:31           ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-12-16 18:57   ` Brian Foster
2025-12-19  5:28     ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2025-12-19 14:01       ` Brian Foster

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251219052803.GA29788@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
    --cc=cem@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox