From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>,
Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] xfs: split and refactor zone validation
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2026 17:44:13 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260110014413.GA15551@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260109172139.2410399-5-hch@lst.de>
On Fri, Jan 09, 2026 at 06:20:49PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Currently xfs_zone_validate mixes validating the software zone state in
> the XFS realtime group with validating the hardware state reported in
> struct blk_zone and deriving the write pointer from that.
>
> Move all code that works on the realtime group to xfs_init_zone, and only
> keep the hardware state validation in xfs_zone_validate. This makes the
> code more clear, and allows for better reuse in userspace.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Hrmm. There's a lot going on in this patch. The code changes here are
a lot of shuffling code around, and I think the end result is that there
are (a) fewer small functions; (b) discovering the write pointer moves
towards xfs_init_zone; and (c) here and elsewhere the validation of that
write pointer shifts towards libxfs...?
If so, then I think I understand what's going on here well enough to say
Reviewed-by: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
--D
> ---
> fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_zones.c | 142 ++++++++++----------------------------
> fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_zones.h | 5 +-
> fs/xfs/xfs_zone_alloc.c | 26 ++++++-
> 3 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 110 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_zones.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_zones.c
> index b40f71f878b5..8d54452744ae 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_zones.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_zones.c
> @@ -14,174 +14,102 @@
> #include "xfs_rtgroup.h"
> #include "xfs_zones.h"
>
> -static bool
> -xfs_zone_validate_empty(
> - struct blk_zone *zone,
> - struct xfs_rtgroup *rtg,
> - xfs_rgblock_t *write_pointer)
> -{
> - struct xfs_mount *mp = rtg_mount(rtg);
> -
> - if (rtg_rmap(rtg)->i_used_blocks > 0) {
> - xfs_warn(mp, "empty zone %u has non-zero used counter (0x%x).",
> - rtg_rgno(rtg), rtg_rmap(rtg)->i_used_blocks);
> - return false;
> - }
> -
> - *write_pointer = 0;
> - return true;
> -}
> -
> -static bool
> -xfs_zone_validate_wp(
> - struct blk_zone *zone,
> - struct xfs_rtgroup *rtg,
> - xfs_rgblock_t *write_pointer)
> -{
> - struct xfs_mount *mp = rtg_mount(rtg);
> - xfs_rtblock_t wp_fsb = xfs_daddr_to_rtb(mp, zone->wp);
> -
> - if (rtg_rmap(rtg)->i_used_blocks > rtg->rtg_extents) {
> - xfs_warn(mp, "zone %u has too large used counter (0x%x).",
> - rtg_rgno(rtg), rtg_rmap(rtg)->i_used_blocks);
> - return false;
> - }
> -
> - if (xfs_rtb_to_rgno(mp, wp_fsb) != rtg_rgno(rtg)) {
> - xfs_warn(mp, "zone %u write pointer (0x%llx) outside of zone.",
> - rtg_rgno(rtg), wp_fsb);
> - return false;
> - }
> -
> - *write_pointer = xfs_rtb_to_rgbno(mp, wp_fsb);
> - if (*write_pointer >= rtg->rtg_extents) {
> - xfs_warn(mp, "zone %u has invalid write pointer (0x%x).",
> - rtg_rgno(rtg), *write_pointer);
> - return false;
> - }
> -
> - return true;
> -}
> -
> -static bool
> -xfs_zone_validate_full(
> - struct blk_zone *zone,
> - struct xfs_rtgroup *rtg,
> - xfs_rgblock_t *write_pointer)
> -{
> - struct xfs_mount *mp = rtg_mount(rtg);
> -
> - if (rtg_rmap(rtg)->i_used_blocks > rtg->rtg_extents) {
> - xfs_warn(mp, "zone %u has too large used counter (0x%x).",
> - rtg_rgno(rtg), rtg_rmap(rtg)->i_used_blocks);
> - return false;
> - }
> -
> - *write_pointer = rtg->rtg_extents;
> - return true;
> -}
> -
> static bool
> xfs_zone_validate_seq(
> + struct xfs_mount *mp,
> struct blk_zone *zone,
> - struct xfs_rtgroup *rtg,
> + unsigned int zone_no,
> xfs_rgblock_t *write_pointer)
> {
> - struct xfs_mount *mp = rtg_mount(rtg);
> -
> switch (zone->cond) {
> case BLK_ZONE_COND_EMPTY:
> - return xfs_zone_validate_empty(zone, rtg, write_pointer);
> + *write_pointer = 0;
> + return true;
> case BLK_ZONE_COND_IMP_OPEN:
> case BLK_ZONE_COND_EXP_OPEN:
> case BLK_ZONE_COND_CLOSED:
> case BLK_ZONE_COND_ACTIVE:
> - return xfs_zone_validate_wp(zone, rtg, write_pointer);
> + if (zone->wp < zone->start ||
> + zone->wp >= zone->start + zone->capacity) {
> + xfs_warn(mp,
> + "zone %u write pointer (%llu) outside of zone.",
> + zone_no, zone->wp);
> + return false;
> + }
> +
> + *write_pointer = XFS_BB_TO_FSB(mp, zone->wp - zone->start);
> + return true;
> case BLK_ZONE_COND_FULL:
> - return xfs_zone_validate_full(zone, rtg, write_pointer);
> + *write_pointer = XFS_BB_TO_FSB(mp, zone->capacity);
> + return true;
> case BLK_ZONE_COND_NOT_WP:
> case BLK_ZONE_COND_OFFLINE:
> case BLK_ZONE_COND_READONLY:
> xfs_warn(mp, "zone %u has unsupported zone condition 0x%x.",
> - rtg_rgno(rtg), zone->cond);
> + zone_no, zone->cond);
> return false;
> default:
> xfs_warn(mp, "zone %u has unknown zone condition 0x%x.",
> - rtg_rgno(rtg), zone->cond);
> + zone_no, zone->cond);
> return false;
> }
> }
>
> static bool
> xfs_zone_validate_conv(
> + struct xfs_mount *mp,
> struct blk_zone *zone,
> - struct xfs_rtgroup *rtg)
> + unsigned int zone_no)
> {
> - struct xfs_mount *mp = rtg_mount(rtg);
> -
> switch (zone->cond) {
> case BLK_ZONE_COND_NOT_WP:
> return true;
> default:
> xfs_warn(mp,
> "conventional zone %u has unsupported zone condition 0x%x.",
> - rtg_rgno(rtg), zone->cond);
> + zone_no, zone->cond);
> return false;
> }
> }
>
> bool
> xfs_zone_validate(
> + struct xfs_mount *mp,
> struct blk_zone *zone,
> - struct xfs_rtgroup *rtg,
> + unsigned int zone_no,
> + uint32_t expected_size,
> + uint32_t expected_capacity,
> xfs_rgblock_t *write_pointer)
> {
> - struct xfs_mount *mp = rtg_mount(rtg);
> - struct xfs_groups *g = &mp->m_groups[XG_TYPE_RTG];
> - uint32_t expected_size;
> -
> /*
> * Check that the zone capacity matches the rtgroup size stored in the
> * superblock. Note that all zones including the last one must have a
> * uniform capacity.
> */
> - if (XFS_BB_TO_FSB(mp, zone->capacity) != g->blocks) {
> + if (XFS_BB_TO_FSB(mp, zone->capacity) != expected_capacity) {
> xfs_warn(mp,
> -"zone %u capacity (0x%llx) does not match RT group size (0x%x).",
> - rtg_rgno(rtg), XFS_BB_TO_FSB(mp, zone->capacity),
> - g->blocks);
> +"zone %u capacity (%llu) does not match RT group size (%u).",
> + zone_no, XFS_BB_TO_FSB(mp, zone->capacity),
> + expected_capacity);
> return false;
> }
>
> - if (g->has_daddr_gaps) {
> - expected_size = 1 << g->blklog;
> - } else {
> - if (zone->len != zone->capacity) {
> - xfs_warn(mp,
> -"zone %u has capacity != size ((0x%llx vs 0x%llx)",
> - rtg_rgno(rtg),
> - XFS_BB_TO_FSB(mp, zone->len),
> - XFS_BB_TO_FSB(mp, zone->capacity));
> - return false;
> - }
> - expected_size = g->blocks;
> - }
> -
> if (XFS_BB_TO_FSB(mp, zone->len) != expected_size) {
> xfs_warn(mp,
> -"zone %u length (0x%llx) does match geometry (0x%x).",
> - rtg_rgno(rtg), XFS_BB_TO_FSB(mp, zone->len),
> +"zone %u length (%llu) does not match geometry (%u).",
> + zone_no, XFS_BB_TO_FSB(mp, zone->len),
> expected_size);
> + return false;
> }
>
> switch (zone->type) {
> case BLK_ZONE_TYPE_CONVENTIONAL:
> - return xfs_zone_validate_conv(zone, rtg);
> + return xfs_zone_validate_conv(mp, zone, zone_no);
> case BLK_ZONE_TYPE_SEQWRITE_REQ:
> - return xfs_zone_validate_seq(zone, rtg, write_pointer);
> + return xfs_zone_validate_seq(mp, zone, zone_no, write_pointer);
> default:
> xfs_warn(mp, "zoned %u has unsupported type 0x%x.",
> - rtg_rgno(rtg), zone->type);
> + zone_no, zone->type);
> return false;
> }
> }
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_zones.h b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_zones.h
> index df10a34da71d..b5b3df04a066 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_zones.h
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_zones.h
> @@ -37,7 +37,8 @@ struct blk_zone;
> */
> #define XFS_DEFAULT_MAX_OPEN_ZONES 128
>
> -bool xfs_zone_validate(struct blk_zone *zone, struct xfs_rtgroup *rtg,
> - xfs_rgblock_t *write_pointer);
> +bool xfs_zone_validate(struct xfs_mount *mp, struct blk_zone *zone,
> + unsigned int zone_no, uint32_t expected_size,
> + uint32_t expected_capacity, xfs_rgblock_t *write_pointer);
>
> #endif /* _LIBXFS_ZONES_H */
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_zone_alloc.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_zone_alloc.c
> index 013228eab0ac..d8df219fd3b4 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_zone_alloc.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_zone_alloc.c
> @@ -977,6 +977,8 @@ xfs_free_open_zones(
>
> struct xfs_init_zones {
> struct xfs_mount *mp;
> + uint32_t zone_size;
> + uint32_t zone_capacity;
> uint64_t available;
> uint64_t reclaimable;
> };
> @@ -1018,6 +1020,25 @@ xfs_init_zone(
> uint32_t used = rtg_rmap(rtg)->i_used_blocks;
> int error;
>
> + if (write_pointer > rtg->rtg_extents) {
> + xfs_warn(mp, "zone %u has invalid write pointer (0x%x).",
> + rtg_rgno(rtg), write_pointer);
> + return -EFSCORRUPTED;
> + }
> +
> + if (used > rtg->rtg_extents) {
> + xfs_warn(mp,
> +"zone %u has used counter (0x%x) larger than zone capacity (0x%llx).",
> + rtg_rgno(rtg), used, rtg->rtg_extents);
> + return -EFSCORRUPTED;
> + }
> +
> + if (write_pointer == 0 && used != 0) {
> + xfs_warn(mp, "empty zone %u has non-zero used counter (0x%x).",
> + rtg_rgno(rtg), used);
> + return -EFSCORRUPTED;
> + }
> +
> /*
> * If there are no used blocks, but the zone is not in empty state yet
> * we lost power before the zoned reset. In that case finish the work
> @@ -1081,7 +1102,8 @@ xfs_get_zone_info_cb(
> xfs_warn(mp, "realtime group not found for zone %u.", rgno);
> return -EFSCORRUPTED;
> }
> - if (!xfs_zone_validate(zone, rtg, &write_pointer)) {
> + if (!xfs_zone_validate(mp, zone, idx, iz->zone_size,
> + iz->zone_capacity, &write_pointer)) {
> xfs_rtgroup_rele(rtg);
> return -EFSCORRUPTED;
> }
> @@ -1227,6 +1249,8 @@ xfs_mount_zones(
> {
> struct xfs_init_zones iz = {
> .mp = mp,
> + .zone_capacity = mp->m_groups[XG_TYPE_RTG].blocks,
> + .zone_size = xfs_rtgroup_raw_size(mp),
> };
> struct xfs_buftarg *bt = mp->m_rtdev_targp;
> xfs_extlen_t zone_blocks = mp->m_groups[XG_TYPE_RTG].blocks;
> --
> 2.47.3
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-10 1:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-09 17:20 refactor zone reporting Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-09 17:20 ` [PATCH 1/6] xfs: add missing forward declaration in xfs_zones.h Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-10 0:50 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-01-09 17:20 ` [PATCH 2/6] xfs: add a xfs_rtgroup_raw_size helper Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-10 1:00 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-01-09 17:20 ` [PATCH 3/6] xfs: pass the write pointer to xfs_init_zone Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-10 1:11 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-01-12 10:15 ` Damien Le Moal
2026-01-12 21:50 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-01-13 7:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-13 7:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-13 9:27 ` Damien Le Moal
2026-01-09 17:20 ` [PATCH 4/6] xfs: split and refactor zone validation Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-10 1:44 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2026-01-12 10:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-09 17:20 ` [PATCH 5/6] xfs: check that used blocks are smaller than the write pointer Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-10 1:25 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-01-09 17:20 ` [PATCH 6/6] xfs: use blkdev_get_zone_info to simply zone reporting Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-10 1:28 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-01-13 10:33 ` Damien Le Moal
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-01-14 6:53 refactor zone reporting v2 Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-14 6:53 ` [PATCH 4/6] xfs: split and refactor zone validation Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-14 10:04 ` Damien Le Moal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260110014413.GA15551@frogsfrogsfrogs \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=cem@kernel.org \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox