From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] xfs: pass the write pointer to xfs_init_zone
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2026 13:50:08 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260112215008.GD15551@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ce23e24a-d671-43bc-a5e1-28ccf7083aff@kernel.org>
On Mon, Jan 12, 2026 at 11:15:07AM +0100, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> On 1/9/26 18:20, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Move the two methods to query the write pointer out of xfs_init_zone into
> > the callers, so that xfs_init_zone doesn't have to bother with the
> > blk_zone structure and instead operates purely at the XFS realtime group
> > level.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> > ---
> > fs/xfs/xfs_zone_alloc.c | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> > 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_zone_alloc.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_zone_alloc.c
> > index bbcf21704ea0..013228eab0ac 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_zone_alloc.c
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_zone_alloc.c
> > @@ -981,43 +981,43 @@ struct xfs_init_zones {
> > uint64_t reclaimable;
> > };
> >
> > +/*
> > + * For sequential write required zones, we restart writing at the hardware write
> > + * pointer.
> > + *
> > + * For conventional zones or conventional devices we have query the rmap to
> > + * find the highest recorded block and set the write pointer to the block after
> > + * that. In case of a power loss this misses blocks where the data I/O has
> > + * completed but not recorded in the rmap yet, and it also rewrites blocks if
> > + * the most recently written ones got deleted again before unmount, but this is
> > + * the best we can do without hardware support.
> > + */
>
> I find this comment and the function name confusing since we are not looking at
> a zone write pointer at all. So maybe rename this to something like:
>
> xfs_rmap_get_highest_rgbno()
>
> ? Also, I think the comment block should go...
>
> > +static xfs_rgblock_t
> > +xfs_rmap_write_pointer(
> > + struct xfs_rtgroup *rtg)
> > +{
> > + xfs_rgblock_t highest_rgbno;
> > +
> > + xfs_rtgroup_lock(rtg, XFS_RTGLOCK_RMAP);
> > + highest_rgbno = xfs_rtrmap_highest_rgbno(rtg);
> > + xfs_rtgroup_unlock(rtg, XFS_RTGLOCK_RMAP);
> > +
> > + if (highest_rgbno == NULLRGBLOCK)
> > + return 0;
> > + return highest_rgbno + 1;
> > +}
>
> [...]
>
> > /*
> > * If there are no used blocks, but the zone is not in empty state yet
> > * we lost power before the zoned reset. In that case finish the work
> > @@ -1066,6 +1066,7 @@ xfs_get_zone_info_cb(
> > struct xfs_mount *mp = iz->mp;
> > xfs_fsblock_t zsbno = xfs_daddr_to_rtb(mp, zone->start);
> > xfs_rgnumber_t rgno;
> > + xfs_rgblock_t write_pointer;
> > struct xfs_rtgroup *rtg;
> > int error;
> >
> > @@ -1080,7 +1081,13 @@ xfs_get_zone_info_cb(
> > xfs_warn(mp, "realtime group not found for zone %u.", rgno);
> > return -EFSCORRUPTED;
> > }
> > - error = xfs_init_zone(iz, rtg, zone);
>
> ...here.
> This code is also hard to follow without a comment indicating that write_pointer
> is not set by xfs_zone_validate() for conventional zones. Ideally, we should
> move the call to xfs_rmap_write_pointer() in xfs_zone_validate(). That would be
> cleaner, no ?
>
> > + if (!xfs_zone_validate(zone, rtg, &write_pointer)) {
I had wondered by the time I got to the end of this series if this
function should be renamed to xfs_validate_hw_zone() or something like
that?
--D
> > + xfs_rtgroup_rele(rtg);
> > + return -EFSCORRUPTED;
> > + }
> > + if (zone->cond == BLK_ZONE_COND_NOT_WP)
> > + write_pointer = xfs_rmap_write_pointer(rtg);
> > + error = xfs_init_zone(iz, rtg, write_pointer);
> > xfs_rtgroup_rele(rtg);
> > return error;
> > }
> > @@ -1290,7 +1297,8 @@ xfs_mount_zones(
> > struct xfs_rtgroup *rtg = NULL;
> >
> > while ((rtg = xfs_rtgroup_next(mp, rtg))) {
> > - error = xfs_init_zone(&iz, rtg, NULL);
> > + error = xfs_init_zone(&iz, rtg,
> > + xfs_rmap_write_pointer(rtg));
> > if (error) {
> > xfs_rtgroup_rele(rtg);
> > goto out_free_zone_info;
>
>
> --
> Damien Le Moal
> Western Digital Research
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-12 21:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-09 17:20 refactor zone reporting Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-09 17:20 ` [PATCH 1/6] xfs: add missing forward declaration in xfs_zones.h Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-10 0:50 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-01-09 17:20 ` [PATCH 2/6] xfs: add a xfs_rtgroup_raw_size helper Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-10 1:00 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-01-09 17:20 ` [PATCH 3/6] xfs: pass the write pointer to xfs_init_zone Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-10 1:11 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-01-12 10:15 ` Damien Le Moal
2026-01-12 21:50 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2026-01-13 7:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-13 7:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-13 9:27 ` Damien Le Moal
2026-01-09 17:20 ` [PATCH 4/6] xfs: split and refactor zone validation Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-10 1:44 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-01-12 10:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-09 17:20 ` [PATCH 5/6] xfs: check that used blocks are smaller than the write pointer Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-10 1:25 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-01-09 17:20 ` [PATCH 6/6] xfs: use blkdev_get_zone_info to simply zone reporting Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-10 1:28 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-01-13 10:33 ` Damien Le Moal
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-01-14 6:53 refactor zone reporting v2 Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-14 6:53 ` [PATCH 3/6] xfs: pass the write pointer to xfs_init_zone Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-14 10:00 ` Damien Le Moal
2026-01-16 14:16 ` Carlos Maiolino
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260112215008.GD15551@frogsfrogsfrogs \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=cem@kernel.org \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox