From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: cem@kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/11] xfs: add media verification ioctl
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2026 22:19:30 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260114061930.GL15583@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260114061559.GA10613@lst.de>
On Wed, Jan 14, 2026 at 07:15:59AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2026 at 10:07:05PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > > a tunable is a better choice here at least for now.
> >
> > <nod> I'll set iosize to 1MB by default and userspace can decrease it if
> > it so desires.
> >
> > Also it occurs to me that max_hw_sectors_kb seems to be 128K for all of
> > my consumer nvme devices, and the fancy Intel ones too. Funny that the
> > sata ssds set it to 4MB, but I guess capping at 128k is one way to
> > reduce the command latency...? (Or the kernel's broken? I can't figure
> > out how to get mpsmin with nvme-cli...)
>
> mpsmin is basically always 4k.
>
>
> On something unrelated: SSDs remap all the time by definition, and
> HDDs are really good at remapping bad sectors these days as well.
> So verifying blocks that do not actually contain file system (meta)data
> is pretty pointless. Can we come up with a way to verify only blocks
> that have valid data in them, while still being resonably sequential?
> I.e. walk the rmap?
xfs_scrub phase6 already calls getfsmap to figure out which parts of the
disk actually contain written data of any kind and are worth verifying.
--D
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-14 6:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-13 0:32 [PATCHSET v5] xfs: autonomous self healing of filesystems Darrick J. Wong
2026-01-13 0:32 ` [PATCH 01/11] docs: discuss autonomous self healing in the xfs online repair design doc Darrick J. Wong
2026-01-13 16:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-13 0:33 ` [PATCH 02/11] xfs: start creating infrastructure for health monitoring Darrick J. Wong
2026-01-13 16:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-13 0:33 ` [PATCH 03/11] xfs: create event queuing, formatting, and discovery infrastructure Darrick J. Wong
2026-01-13 16:05 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-13 0:33 ` [PATCH 04/11] xfs: convey filesystem unmount events to the health monitor Darrick J. Wong
2026-01-13 16:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-13 18:48 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-01-13 0:33 ` [PATCH 05/11] xfs: convey metadata health " Darrick J. Wong
2026-01-13 16:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-13 0:34 ` [PATCH 06/11] xfs: convey filesystem shutdown " Darrick J. Wong
2026-01-13 16:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-13 19:01 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-01-13 0:34 ` [PATCH 07/11] xfs: convey externally discovered fsdax media errors " Darrick J. Wong
2026-01-13 16:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-13 0:34 ` [PATCH 08/11] xfs: convey file I/O " Darrick J. Wong
2026-01-13 16:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-13 0:34 ` [PATCH 09/11] xfs: allow reconfiguration of the health monitoring device Darrick J. Wong
2026-01-13 16:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-13 18:28 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-01-13 0:35 ` [PATCH 10/11] xfs: check if an open file is on the health monitored fs Darrick J. Wong
2026-01-13 16:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-13 0:35 ` [PATCH 11/11] xfs: add media verification ioctl Darrick J. Wong
2026-01-13 15:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-13 23:21 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-01-14 5:40 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-01-14 6:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-14 6:07 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-01-14 6:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-14 6:19 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-01-16 5:42 [PATCHSET v6] xfs: autonomous self healing of filesystems Darrick J. Wong
2026-01-16 5:44 ` [PATCH 11/11] xfs: add media verification ioctl Darrick J. Wong
2026-01-19 15:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-19 17:35 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-01-21 6:34 [PATCHSET v7 1/3] xfs: autonomous self healing of filesystems Darrick J. Wong
2026-01-21 6:37 ` [PATCH 11/11] xfs: add media verification ioctl Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260114061930.GL15583@frogsfrogsfrogs \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=cem@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox