From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: cem@kernel.org
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, hch@lst.de, lukas@herbolt.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7] xfs: add FALLOC_FL_WRITE_ZEROES to XFS code base
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2026 07:57:52 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260120155752.GN15551@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260120132056.534646-2-cem@kernel.org>
On Tue, Jan 20, 2026 at 02:20:50PM +0100, cem@kernel.org wrote:
> From: Lukas Herbolt <lukas@herbolt.com>
>
> Add support for FALLOC_FL_WRITE_ZEROES if the underlying device enable
> the unmap write zeroes operation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lukas Herbolt <lukas@herbolt.com>
> [cem: rewrite xfs_falloc_zero_range() bits]
> ---
>
> Christoph, Darrick, could you please review/ack this patch again? I
> needed to rewrite the xfs_falloc_zero_range() bits, because it
> conflicted with 66d78a11479c and 8dc15b7a6e59. This version aims mostly
> to remove one of the if-else nested levels to keep it a bit cleaner.
>
> please let me know if you agree with this version, otherwise I'll ask
> Lukas to rebase it on top of the new code.
>
> Thanks!
>
> fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c | 10 ++++++++--
> fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.h | 2 +-
> fs/xfs/xfs_file.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> 3 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c
> index 0ab00615f1ad..74a7597d0998 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c
> @@ -642,11 +642,17 @@ xfs_free_eofblocks(
> return error;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Callers can specify bmapi_flags, if XFS_BMAPI_ZERO is used there are no
> + * further checks whether the hard ware supports and it can fallback to
> + * software zeroing.
> + */
> int
> xfs_alloc_file_space(
> struct xfs_inode *ip,
> xfs_off_t offset,
> - xfs_off_t len)
> + xfs_off_t len,
> + uint32_t bmapi_flags)
> {
> xfs_mount_t *mp = ip->i_mount;
> xfs_off_t count;
> @@ -748,7 +754,7 @@ xfs_alloc_file_space(
> * will eventually reach the requested range.
> */
> error = xfs_bmapi_write(tp, ip, startoffset_fsb,
> - allocatesize_fsb, XFS_BMAPI_PREALLOC, 0, imapp,
> + allocatesize_fsb, bmapi_flags, 0, imapp,
> &nimaps);
> if (error) {
> if (error != -ENOSR)
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.h
> index c477b3361630..2895cc97a572 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.h
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.h
> @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ int xfs_bmap_last_extent(struct xfs_trans *tp, struct xfs_inode *ip,
>
> /* preallocation and hole punch interface */
> int xfs_alloc_file_space(struct xfs_inode *ip, xfs_off_t offset,
> - xfs_off_t len);
> + xfs_off_t len, uint32_t bmapi_flags);
> int xfs_free_file_space(struct xfs_inode *ip, xfs_off_t offset,
> xfs_off_t len, struct xfs_zone_alloc_ctx *ac);
> int xfs_collapse_file_space(struct xfs_inode *, xfs_off_t offset,
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
> index d36a9aafa8ab..b23f1373116e 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
> @@ -1302,16 +1302,29 @@ xfs_falloc_zero_range(
>
> if (xfs_falloc_force_zero(ip, ac)) {
> error = xfs_zero_range(ip, offset, len, ac, NULL);
> - } else {
> - error = xfs_free_file_space(ip, offset, len, ac);
> - if (error)
> - return error;
> + goto out;
> + }
>
> - len = round_up(offset + len, blksize) -
> - round_down(offset, blksize);
> - offset = round_down(offset, blksize);
> - error = xfs_alloc_file_space(ip, offset, len);
> + error = xfs_free_file_space(ip, offset, len, ac);
> + if (error)
> + return error;
> +
> + len = round_up(offset + len, blksize) - round_down(offset, blksize);
> + offset = round_down(offset, blksize);
> +
> + if (mode & FALLOC_FL_WRITE_ZEROES) {
> + if (xfs_is_always_cow_inode(ip) ||
> + !bdev_write_zeroes_unmap_sectors(
> + xfs_inode_buftarg(ip)->bt_bdev))
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
Taking a second look -- this code allows ZERO_RANGE|WRITE_ZEROES to
punch out the file space but then fail with EOPNOTSUPP. I think if
we're going to error out that way, we should do that at the top of the
function before any changes are made.
--D
> + error = xfs_alloc_file_space(ip, offset, len,
> + XFS_BMAPI_ZERO);
> + } else {
> + error = xfs_alloc_file_space(ip, offset, len,
> + XFS_BMAPI_PREALLOC);
> }
> +
> +out:
> if (error)
> return error;
> return xfs_falloc_setsize(file, new_size);
> @@ -1336,7 +1349,8 @@ xfs_falloc_unshare_range(
> if (error)
> return error;
>
> - error = xfs_alloc_file_space(XFS_I(inode), offset, len);
> + error = xfs_alloc_file_space(XFS_I(inode), offset, len,
> + XFS_BMAPI_PREALLOC);
> if (error)
> return error;
> return xfs_falloc_setsize(file, new_size);
> @@ -1364,7 +1378,8 @@ xfs_falloc_allocate_range(
> if (error)
> return error;
>
> - error = xfs_alloc_file_space(XFS_I(inode), offset, len);
> + error = xfs_alloc_file_space(XFS_I(inode), offset, len,
> + XFS_BMAPI_PREALLOC);
> if (error)
> return error;
> return xfs_falloc_setsize(file, new_size);
> @@ -1374,7 +1389,7 @@ xfs_falloc_allocate_range(
> (FALLOC_FL_ALLOCATE_RANGE | FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE | \
> FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE | FALLOC_FL_COLLAPSE_RANGE | \
> FALLOC_FL_ZERO_RANGE | FALLOC_FL_INSERT_RANGE | \
> - FALLOC_FL_UNSHARE_RANGE)
> + FALLOC_FL_UNSHARE_RANGE | FALLOC_FL_WRITE_ZEROES)
>
> STATIC long
> __xfs_file_fallocate(
> @@ -1417,6 +1432,7 @@ __xfs_file_fallocate(
> case FALLOC_FL_INSERT_RANGE:
> error = xfs_falloc_insert_range(file, offset, len);
> break;
> + case FALLOC_FL_WRITE_ZEROES:
> case FALLOC_FL_ZERO_RANGE:
> error = xfs_falloc_zero_range(file, mode, offset, len, ac);
> break;
> --
> 2.52.0
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-20 15:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-20 13:20 [PATCH v7] xfs: add FALLOC_FL_WRITE_ZEROES to XFS code base cem
2026-01-20 15:57 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2026-01-21 6:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-29 7:39 ` lukas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260120155752.GN15551@frogsfrogsfrogs \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=cem@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukas@herbolt.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox