From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A644D3101DC for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2026 16:16:41 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1769617001; cv=none; b=LOlIf6htaSsPjRr/l+kvcCbSU41jLg6P8MZs/vixNzO2M1qABpqPePd4SMf/EcpgPoGYvH3gCDf07mKfx9YyqNx869+v+GEAHL5eL4POimNfkYiUqHnMbwCVO4CPd9xnT7W/CUTKEvDejwx63Q28WmsnMP2Y6OWB4U8fG5QuEfI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1769617001; c=relaxed/simple; bh=nI07S4fsrBVIEkobGuWfpQcZDECVNUQVGjrtWTpcLT4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=satSbGwXB5Dwud137eHMFH63U0rc8vltNSYfbgc0MFmw2sUYCkvQX7rB95rchiAVE2Xhpkoaq4WJvgPKFFnZj+IviIr16ab4sutCqSehOP7cHeVifFwhPl9MDIUogGMoOLC9BNQYpQSaMEy1lKRWQd8NLL7NT2VTJsoURJnpa20= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=iR0kvcnL; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="iR0kvcnL" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 81F1BC4CEF7; Wed, 28 Jan 2026 16:16:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1769617001; bh=nI07S4fsrBVIEkobGuWfpQcZDECVNUQVGjrtWTpcLT4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=iR0kvcnLN7AD3ZI/SQyXiadad86R3VEILjhRUGryxd57c2rXO/jL93SSgMiA+riaW ThH4Cr8u16Urax125Et8EOd69aOaSXvSe2RJ3LZsFhfnX5OA817KvrhVunrcpa8Kn4 r35Yl4wX0KZi6IuZQl6M64jemseLXiwTXfkXItpP5H2H+MwejnqvAJwg+KbaiVeBTl qlncOA4xdHGylypWi5ACufkS/fbHGk4oqLhQdlHdFrokcNVjVmu6aLgGqxOY7sBBCO CE1736Il3XXxCLMx4W6DcPTspfKfILgvHpcV2Qvo9+3jZRTthZD50mTsjahkMJf9G+ rQ3sPdXS8Yg0Q== Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2026 08:16:41 -0800 From: "Darrick J. Wong" To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Carlos Maiolino , Hans Holmberg , linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/10] xfs: allow setting errortags at mount time Message-ID: <20260128161641.GW5945@frogsfrogsfrogs> References: <20260127160619.330250-1-hch@lst.de> <20260127160619.330250-7-hch@lst.de> <20260128161142.GT5945@frogsfrogsfrogs> <20260128161351.GA12914@lst.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260128161351.GA12914@lst.de> On Wed, Jan 28, 2026 at 05:13:51PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Jan 28, 2026 at 08:11:42AM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > Should we explicitly state here that the errortag=XXX will /not/ be > > echoed back via /proc/mounts? > > Sure, I'll add that. > > > Seeing as we recently had bug reports > > about scripts encoding /proc/mounts into /etc/fstab. > > WTF? I tried to remove ikeep/noikeep/noattr2/attr2 and someone complained that we broke his initramfs because Gentoo or whatever has this dumb script that "generates" rootflags= (and maybe fstab too) from /proc/mounts. --D