From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Shinichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>
Cc: hch <hch@lst.de>,
"linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [bug report] xfs/802 failure due to mssing fstype report by lsblk
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2026 22:17:58 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260210061758.GE7712@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260210020040.GC7712@frogsfrogsfrogs>
On Mon, Feb 09, 2026 at 06:00:40PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 09, 2026 at 07:54:38AM +0000, Shinichiro Kawasaki wrote:
> > On Feb 09, 2026 / 07:28, hch wrote:
> > > On Sun, Feb 08, 2026 at 10:07:16PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > > > Waitaminute, how can you even format xfs on nullblk to run fstests?
> > > > Isn't that the bdev that silently discards everything written to it, and
> > > > returns zero on reads??
> > >
> > > nullblk can be used with or without a backing store. In the former
> > > case it will not always return zeroes on reads obviously.
> >
> > Yes, null_blk has the "memory_backed" parameter. When 1 is set to this, data
> > written to the null_blk device is kept and read back. I create two 8GiB null_blk
> > devices enabling this memory_backed option, and use them as TEST_DEV and
> > SCRATCH_DEV for the regular xfs test runs.
>
> Huh, ok. Just out of curiosity, does blkid (in cache mode) /ever/ see
> the xfs filesystem? I'm wondering if there's a race, a slow utility, or
> if whatever builds the blkid cache sees that it's nullblk and ignores
> it?
Ah, I see. The problem isnt *blkid* failing to see the new xfs
filesystem, it's lsblk failing to see that it has an xfs filesystem:
# udevadm monitor &
[1] 5743
# monitor will print the received events for:
UDEV - the event which udev sends out after rule processing
KERNEL - the kernel uevent
# mkfs.xfs -f /dev/nullb0
meta-data=/dev/nullb0 isize=512 agcount=4, agsize=65536 blks
= sectsz=512 attr=2, projid32bit=1
= crc=1 finobt=1, sparse=1, rmapbt=1
= reflink=1 bigtime=1 inobtcount=1 nrext64=1
= exchange=1 metadir=0
data = bsize=4096 blocks=262144, imaxpct=25
= sunit=0 swidth=0 blks
naming =version 2 bsize=4096 ascii-ci=0, ftype=1, parent=1
log =internal log bsize=4096 blocks=16384, version=2
= sectsz=512 sunit=0 blks, lazy-count=1
realtime =none extsz=4096 blocks=0, rtextents=0
= rgcount=0 rgsize=0 extents
= zoned=0 start=0 reserved=0
Discarding blocks...Done.
#
<taps foot>
# mkfs.xfs -f /dev/sda
meta-data=/dev/sda isize=512 agcount=4, agsize=314368 blks
= sectsz=512 attr=2, projid32bit=1
= crc=1 finobt=1, sparse=1, rmapbt=1
= reflink=1 bigtime=1 inobtcount=1 nrext64=1
= exchange=1 metadir=0
data = bsize=4096 blocks=1257472, imaxpct=25
= sunit=0 swidth=0 blks
naming =version 2 bsize=4096 ascii-ci=0, ftype=1, parent=1
log =internal log bsize=4096 blocks=16384, version=2
= sectsz=512 sunit=0 blks, lazy-count=1
realtime =none extsz=4096 blocks=0, rtextents=0
= rgcount=0 rgsize=0 extents
= zoned=0 start=0 reserved=0
Discarding blocks...Done.
# KERNEL[1500.715783] change /devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:06.0/virtio2/host0/target0:0:0/0:0:0:0/block/sda (block)
UDEV [1500.806556] change /devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:06.0/virtio2/host0/target0:0:0/0:0:0:0/block/sda (block)
So for some reason nullb0 doesn't generate kernel uevents when mkfs.xfs
closes the block device, like it does for scsi disks. I don't know why
that is, but I'll look at it when I get a chance; it's very late here
now.
--D
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-10 6:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-06 8:40 [bug report] xfs/802 failure due to mssing fstype report by lsblk Shinichiro Kawasaki
2026-02-06 17:38 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-02-09 2:50 ` Shinichiro Kawasaki
2026-02-09 6:07 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-02-09 6:28 ` hch
2026-02-09 7:54 ` Shinichiro Kawasaki
2026-02-10 2:00 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-02-10 6:17 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2026-02-10 6:19 ` Shinichiro Kawasaki
2026-02-13 22:14 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-02-14 6:39 ` Shinichiro Kawasaki
2026-02-14 7:39 ` Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260210061758.GE7712@frogsfrogsfrogs \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox