From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E950E35E948 for ; Wed, 4 Mar 2026 16:35:03 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772642104; cv=none; b=kdHINnZRm2QOnIPcRTHECSyh5DlmOVkAWzXPMROLtMwnHoJweDVxjktbgnAVHuvT0FUVz5EAXEsN5qM7c8/vQNFCEDgQBuKCwEsPBCXzZcCAJqwtwhdyoYzAFNC2wGtsXxGt3YiP4IEogRoESzMYDYEpjMfdm6nIrBSkGaY/6Zs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772642104; c=relaxed/simple; bh=LV/NmH2Icjkm167Lisysr8e5DoR2luFIm2fACHqaFJc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=BCkVjAJofjHNYIiwGs8TQR7z7Alc8Ff2h5wgpG/n+ZCpa9WcY/cSRIFxxhA7oCrB/mCWtiPfxD49WNpwc/zzdpWPZ8Av1XoVJ+TvyQG+2xrNeXjNusd5udOI3jfl9se8mvScDBfRD2CBZi2DEgoHqNO94GbGQLp6kGo3PJymGKE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=qtf2aHyi; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="qtf2aHyi" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 55793C4CEF7; Wed, 4 Mar 2026 16:35:03 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1772642103; bh=LV/NmH2Icjkm167Lisysr8e5DoR2luFIm2fACHqaFJc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=qtf2aHyiMau2TQwneGmseRRBkorTTbT+YehZOHQH2aBiyg1Uoj7VsLiypvHOyg2E/ R459mc4MGTcoaMYM239+6QMWwD/xxmxqzxLX17jIa5dGyi2tzlL5gEho3SpzDIvaD7 hQXh2eFZSvyF8CSQ7+vQlX+ZaHhbyixG4q+u/HH01MIjVY4H7pz2dzrv987PPwc06a 8n/nfkpOQ90moCifky2hx48wi1zgaBn6/6b+iVXYLaq3a7PPJBiAODcIunBXvdKDSs 3ezgzjWhWdq7XbHoXEjvmKsF39kd2FmEuDv6tFNfv/ef9x9trFg9PVGH8lsFrWQxoj XUIhdM8Gti6KA== Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2026 08:35:02 -0800 From: "Darrick J. Wong" To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: aalbersh@kernel.org, hch@lst.de, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 23/26] xfs_io: print systemd service names Message-ID: <20260304163502.GV57948@frogsfrogsfrogs> References: <177249783165.482027.209169366483011357.stgit@frogsfrogsfrogs> <177249783711.482027.11261039889156364110.stgit@frogsfrogsfrogs> <20260303172916.GR57948@frogsfrogsfrogs> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Wed, Mar 04, 2026 at 05:04:18AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Mar 03, 2026 at 09:29:16AM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > (That was a long way of saying "can't we just keep using xfs_io as a > > dumping ground for QA-related xfs stuff?" ;)) > > I really hate messing it up with things that are no I/O at all, > and not related to issuing I/O or related syscalls. Maybe just add > a new little binary for it? How about xfs_db, since normal users shouldn't need to compute the service unit names? --D