From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Long Li <leo.lilong@huawei.com>
Cc: cem@kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, david@fromorbit.com,
yi.zhang@huawei.com, houtao1@huawei.com, yangerkun@huawei.com,
lonuxli.64@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] xfs: close crash window in attr dabtree inactivation
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2026 09:59:33 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260309165933.GK6033@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260309082752.2039861-5-leo.lilong@huawei.com>
On Mon, Mar 09, 2026 at 04:27:52PM +0800, Long Li wrote:
> When inactivating an inode with node-format extended attributes,
> xfs_attr3_node_inactive() invalidates all child leaf/node blocks via
> xfs_trans_binval(), but intentionally does not remove the corresponding
> entries from their parent node blocks. The implicit assumption is that
> xfs_attr_inactive() will truncate the entire attr fork to zero extents
> afterwards, so log recovery will never reach the root node and follow
> those stale pointers.
>
> However, if a log shutdown occurs after the child block cancellations
> commit but before the attr bmap truncation commits, this assumption
> breaks. Recovery replays the attr bmap intact (the inode still has
> attr fork extents), but suppresses replay of all cancelled child
> blocks, maybe leaving them as stale data on disk. On the next mount,
> xlog_recover_process_iunlinks() retries inactivation and attempts to
> read the root node via the attr bmap. If the root node was not replayed,
> reading the unreplayed root block triggers a metadata verification
> failure immediately; if it was replayed, following its child pointers
> to unreplayed child blocks triggers the same failure:
>
> XFS (pmem0): Metadata corruption detected at
> xfs_da3_node_read_verify+0x53/0x220, xfs_da3_node block 0x78
> XFS (pmem0): Unmount and run xfs_repair
> XFS (pmem0): First 128 bytes of corrupted metadata buffer:
> 00000000: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
> 00000010: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
> 00000020: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
> 00000030: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
> 00000040: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
> 00000050: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
> 00000060: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
> 00000070: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
> XFS (pmem0): metadata I/O error in "xfs_da_read_buf+0x104/0x190" at daddr 0x78 len 8 error 117
Did you hit this through a customer issue? Or is this the same "corrupt
block 0 of inode 25165954 attribute fork" problem exposed by generic/753
last week? Or possibly both?
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-xfs/CAF-d4Oscq=qaCd9dbbEZjG8dA5Q7erdWSszoxY1migM8j85eRw@mail.gmail.com/
> Fix this in two places:
>
> In xfs_attr3_node_inactive(), after calling xfs_trans_binval() on a
> child block, immediately remove the entry that references it from the
> parent node in the same transaction. This eliminates the window where
> the parent holds a pointer to a cancelled block. Once all children are
> removed, the now-empty root node is converted to a leaf block within the
> same transaction. This node-to-leaf conversion is necessary for crash
> safety. If the system shutdown after the empty node is written to the
> log but before the second-phase bmap truncation commits, log recovery
> will attempt to verify the root block on disk. xfs_da3_node_verify()
> does not permit a node block with count == 0; such a block will fail
> verification and trigger a metadata corruption shutdown. on the other
> hand, leaf blocks are allowed to have this transient state.
Hrmmm... this really does sound like the "corrupt block 0" problem
referenced above.
> In xfs_attr_inactive(), split the attr fork truncation into two explicit
> phases. First, truncate all extents beyond the root block (the child
> extents whose parent references have already been removed above).
> Second, invalidate the root block and truncate the attr bmap to zero in
> a single transaction. The two operations in the second phase must be
> atomic: as long as the attr bmap has any non-zero length, recovery can
> follow it to the root block, so the root block invalidation must commit
> together with the bmap-to-zero truncation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Long Li <leo.lilong@huawei.com>
> ---
> fs/xfs/xfs_attr_inactive.c | 97 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_attr_inactive.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_attr_inactive.c
> index 92331991f9fd..2ffa6b51a356 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_attr_inactive.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_attr_inactive.c
> @@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ xfs_attr3_node_inactive(
> xfs_daddr_t parent_blkno, child_blkno;
> struct xfs_buf *child_bp;
> struct xfs_da3_icnode_hdr ichdr;
> - int error, i;
> + int error;
>
> /*
> * Since this code is recursive (gasp!) we must protect ourselves.
> @@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ xfs_attr3_node_inactive(
> * over the leaves removing all of them. If this is higher up
> * in the tree, recurse downward.
> */
> - for (i = 0; i < ichdr.count; i++) {
> + while (ichdr.count > 0) {
> /*
> * Read the subsidiary block to see what we have to work with.
> * Don't do this in a transaction. This is a depth-first
> @@ -218,29 +218,32 @@ xfs_attr3_node_inactive(
> xfs_trans_binval(*trans, child_bp);
> child_bp = NULL;
>
> - /*
> - * If we're not done, re-read the parent to get the next
> - * child block number.
> - */
> - if (i + 1 < ichdr.count) {
> - struct xfs_da3_icnode_hdr phdr;
> -
> - error = xfs_da3_node_read_mapped(*trans, dp,
> - parent_blkno, &bp, XFS_ATTR_FORK);
> - if (error)
> - return error;
> - xfs_da3_node_hdr_from_disk(dp->i_mount, &phdr,
> - bp->b_addr);
> - child_fsb = be32_to_cpu(phdr.btree[i + 1].before);
> - xfs_trans_brelse(*trans, bp);
> - bp = NULL;
> - }
> - /*
> - * Atomically commit the whole invalidate stuff.
> - */
> - error = xfs_trans_roll_inode(trans, dp);
> + error = xfs_da3_node_read_mapped(*trans, dp,
> + parent_blkno, &bp, XFS_ATTR_FORK);
> if (error)
> - return error;
> + return error;
> +
> + /*
> + * Remove entry form parent node, prevents being indexed to.
> + */
> + xfs_da3_node_entry_remove(*trans, dp, bp, 0);
> +
> + xfs_da3_node_hdr_from_disk(dp->i_mount, &ichdr, bp->b_addr);
> + bp = NULL;
> +
> + if (ichdr.count > 0) {
> + /*
> + * If we're not done, get the next child block number.
> + */
> + child_fsb = be32_to_cpu(ichdr.btree[0].before);
> +
> + /*
> + * Atomically commit the whole invalidate stuff.
> + */
> + error = xfs_trans_roll_inode(trans, dp);
> + if (error)
> + return error;
Don't move the double space down to ^^ here. ;)
> + }
> }
>
> return 0;
> @@ -257,10 +260,8 @@ xfs_attr3_root_inactive(
> struct xfs_trans **trans,
> struct xfs_inode *dp)
> {
> - struct xfs_mount *mp = dp->i_mount;
> struct xfs_da_blkinfo *info;
> struct xfs_buf *bp;
> - xfs_daddr_t blkno;
> int error;
>
> /*
> @@ -272,7 +273,6 @@ xfs_attr3_root_inactive(
> error = xfs_da3_node_read(*trans, dp, 0, &bp, XFS_ATTR_FORK);
> if (error)
> return error;
> - blkno = xfs_buf_daddr(bp);
>
> /*
> * Invalidate the tree, even if the "tree" is only a single leaf block.
> @@ -283,6 +283,16 @@ xfs_attr3_root_inactive(
> case cpu_to_be16(XFS_DA_NODE_MAGIC):
> case cpu_to_be16(XFS_DA3_NODE_MAGIC):
> error = xfs_attr3_node_inactive(trans, dp, bp, 1);
> + if (error)
> + return error;
> +
> + /*
> + * Empty root node block are not allowed, convert it to leaf.
> + */
> + error = xfs_attr3_leaf_init(*trans, dp, 0);
Responding to my own question: Ah, I see -- "leaf init" doesn't use the
bp anymore and it's attached to the transaction so it doesn't leak.
That's a little subtle since there's nothing preventing someone from
calling xfs_attr3_leaf_init(NULL, dp, 0).
> + if (error)
> + return error;
> + error = xfs_trans_roll_inode(trans, dp);
If we have an xattr structure with multiple levels of dabtree nodes, can
this lead to the somewhat odd situation where the tree levels are
uneven during deconstruction? For example
root
/ \
node empty_leaf
| \
| \
node node
| \
leaves more_leaves
Does this matter, or can the inactivation code already handle it? I
suppose since we're inactivating (either in inodegc or in recovery after
a crash) user programs will never see this so the window of confusion
might be pretty small.
--D
> break;
> case cpu_to_be16(XFS_ATTR_LEAF_MAGIC):
> case cpu_to_be16(XFS_ATTR3_LEAF_MAGIC):
> @@ -295,21 +305,6 @@ xfs_attr3_root_inactive(
> xfs_trans_brelse(*trans, bp);
> break;
> }
> - if (error)
> - return error;
> -
> - /*
> - * Invalidate the incore copy of the root block.
> - */
> - error = xfs_trans_get_buf(*trans, mp->m_ddev_targp, blkno,
> - XFS_FSB_TO_BB(mp, mp->m_attr_geo->fsbcount), 0, &bp);
> - if (error)
> - return error;
> - xfs_trans_binval(*trans, bp); /* remove from cache */
> - /*
> - * Commit the invalidate and start the next transaction.
> - */
> - error = xfs_trans_roll_inode(trans, dp);
>
> return error;
> }
> @@ -328,6 +323,7 @@ xfs_attr_inactive(
> {
> struct xfs_trans *trans;
> struct xfs_mount *mp;
> + struct xfs_buf *bp;
> int lock_mode = XFS_ILOCK_SHARED;
> int error = 0;
>
> @@ -363,10 +359,27 @@ xfs_attr_inactive(
> * removal below.
> */
> if (dp->i_af.if_nextents > 0) {
> + /*
> + * Invalidate and truncate all blocks but leave the root block.
> + */
> error = xfs_attr3_root_inactive(&trans, dp);
> if (error)
> goto out_cancel;
>
> + error = xfs_itruncate_extents(&trans, dp, XFS_ATTR_FORK,
> + XFS_FSB_TO_B(mp, mp->m_attr_geo->fsbcount));
> + if (error)
> + goto out_cancel;
> +
> + /*
> + * Invalidate and truncate the root block and ensure that the
> + * operation is completed within a single transaction.
> + */
> + error = xfs_da_get_buf(trans, dp, 0, &bp, XFS_ATTR_FORK);
> + if (error)
> + goto out_cancel;
> +
> + xfs_trans_binval(trans, bp);
> error = xfs_itruncate_extents(&trans, dp, XFS_ATTR_FORK, 0);
> if (error)
> goto out_cancel;
> --
> 2.39.2
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-09 16:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-09 8:27 [PATCH 0/4] xfs: close crash window in attr dabtree inactivation Long Li
2026-03-09 8:27 ` [PATCH 1/4] xfs: only assert new size for datafork during truncate extents Long Li
2026-03-09 16:39 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-03-09 8:27 ` [PATCH 2/4] xfs: factor out xfs_da3_node_entry_remove Long Li
2026-03-09 16:42 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-03-10 2:15 ` Long Li
2026-03-10 11:58 ` Long Li
2026-03-10 14:38 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-03-09 8:27 ` [PATCH 3/4] xfs: factor out xfs_attr3_leaf_init Long Li
2026-03-09 16:44 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-03-10 7:42 ` Long Li
2026-03-09 8:27 ` [PATCH 4/4] xfs: close crash window in attr dabtree inactivation Long Li
2026-03-09 16:59 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2026-03-10 8:19 ` Long Li
2026-03-10 14:46 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-03-11 2:34 ` Long Li
2026-03-13 14:46 ` Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260309165933.GK6033@frogsfrogsfrogs \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=cem@kernel.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=houtao1@huawei.com \
--cc=leo.lilong@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lonuxli.64@gmail.com \
--cc=yangerkun@huawei.com \
--cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox