Linux XFS filesystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Long Li <leo.lilong@huawei.com>
Cc: cem@kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, david@fromorbit.com,
	yi.zhang@huawei.com, houtao1@huawei.com, yangerkun@huawei.com,
	lonuxli.64@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] xfs: factor out xfs_da3_node_entry_remove
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2026 07:38:16 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260310143816.GJ1105363@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <abAHX977xcOEaqRM@localhost.localdomain>

On Tue, Mar 10, 2026 at 07:58:23PM +0800, Long Li wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 09, 2026 at 09:42:29AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > 
> > > +	__xfs_da3_node_remove(state->args->trans, state->args->dp,
> > > +			state->args->geo, drop_blk);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +/*
> > > + * Remove an entry from a node at the specified index, this is an exported
> > > + * wrapper for removing entries from intermediate nodes.
> > > + */
> > > +void
> > > +xfs_da3_node_entry_remove(
> > 
> > This only applies to attr(ibute) structures, as evidenced by m_attr_geo
> > below.  I think this ought to be named xfs_attr3_node_entry_remove.
> > 
> 
> Considering that xfs_da_btree.c implements functions related to xfs_da*, 
> it might not be appropriate to place xfs_attr3_node_entry_remove here either.
> I think we could add an additional `struct xfs_da_geometry *geo` parameter
> to xfs_da3_node_entry_remove() and let it be specified externally, which
> would increase the function's generality. What do you think?

Why does it need to be general?  Don't go adding code for a user
(directories) that doesn't exist.

--D

> 
> Thanks,
> Long Li
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-10 14:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-09  8:27 [PATCH 0/4] xfs: close crash window in attr dabtree inactivation Long Li
2026-03-09  8:27 ` [PATCH 1/4] xfs: only assert new size for datafork during truncate extents Long Li
2026-03-09 16:39   ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-03-09  8:27 ` [PATCH 2/4] xfs: factor out xfs_da3_node_entry_remove Long Li
2026-03-09 16:42   ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-03-10  2:15     ` Long Li
2026-03-10 11:58     ` Long Li
2026-03-10 14:38       ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2026-03-09  8:27 ` [PATCH 3/4] xfs: factor out xfs_attr3_leaf_init Long Li
2026-03-09 16:44   ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-03-10  7:42     ` Long Li
2026-03-09  8:27 ` [PATCH 4/4] xfs: close crash window in attr dabtree inactivation Long Li
2026-03-09 16:59   ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-03-10  8:19     ` Long Li
2026-03-10 14:46       ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-03-11  2:34         ` Long Li
2026-03-13 14:46           ` Darrick J. Wong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260310143816.GJ1105363@frogsfrogsfrogs \
    --to=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=cem@kernel.org \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=houtao1@huawei.com \
    --cc=leo.lilong@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lonuxli.64@gmail.com \
    --cc=yangerkun@huawei.com \
    --cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox