public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v2 0/4] Zoned device cleanups
@ 2026-03-10 17:36 cem
  2026-03-10 17:36 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] xfs: factor out isize updates from xfs_dio_write_end_io cem
                   ` (4 more replies)
  0 siblings, 5 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: cem @ 2026-03-10 17:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-xfs; +Cc: hch, dlemoal

From: Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>

This is the V2 of this series, which implement changes suggested by
Damien and Christoph on the V1.

Only changes are on patches 1 and 2.

Original cover follows:

These patches initially were part from an attempt to implement atomic
writes for zoned devices.

Due to unforeseen circumstances, we can't implement it, at least for now
without restructuring a big part of the code.

Christoph though suggested those cleanups were good enough to be sent
even without proceeding with the implementation.


Carlos Maiolino (4):
  xfs: factor out isize updates from xfs_dio_write_end_io
  xfs: factor out xfs_dio_write_zoned_end_io
  xfs: factor out xfs_zone_inc_written
  xfs: opencode xfs_zone_record_blocks

 fs/xfs/xfs_file.c       | 95 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 fs/xfs/xfs_zone_alloc.c | 32 ++++++--------
 2 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)

Signed-off-by: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com>
-- 
2.53.0

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 1/4] xfs: factor out isize updates from xfs_dio_write_end_io
  2026-03-10 17:36 [PATCH v2 0/4] Zoned device cleanups cem
@ 2026-03-10 17:36 ` cem
  2026-03-11  7:03   ` Damien Le Moal
  2026-03-12  6:52   ` Christoph Hellwig
  2026-03-10 17:36 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] xfs: factor out xfs_dio_write_zoned_end_io cem
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: cem @ 2026-03-10 17:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-xfs; +Cc: hch, dlemoal

From: Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>

This is the only code needed for zoned inodes, so factor it out so
we can move zoned inodes ioend to its own callback.

Signed-off-by: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com>
---
v2: Don't call xfs_setfilesize() unnecessarily

 fs/xfs/xfs_file.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
index 6246f34df9fd..fce6be55d90c 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
@@ -560,6 +560,42 @@ xfs_zoned_write_space_reserve(
 			flags, ac);
 }
 
+/*
+ * We need to lock the test/set EOF update as we can be racing with
+ * other IO completions here to update the EOF. Failing to serialise
+ * here can result in EOF moving backwards and Bad Things Happen when
+ * that occurs.
+ *
+ * As IO completion only ever extends EOF, we can do an unlocked check
+ * here to avoid taking the spinlock. If we land within the current EOF,
+ * then we do not need to do an extending update at all, and we don't
+ * need to take the lock to check this. If we race with an update moving
+ * EOF, then we'll either still be beyond EOF and need to take the lock,
+ * or we'll be within EOF and we don't need to take it at all.
+ */
+static int
+xfs_dio_endio_set_isize(
+	struct inode		*inode,
+	loff_t			offset,
+	ssize_t			size)
+{
+	struct xfs_inode	*ip = XFS_I(inode);
+
+	if (offset + size <= i_size_read(inode))
+		return 0;
+
+	spin_lock(&ip->i_flags_lock);
+	if (offset + size <= i_size_read(inode)) {
+		spin_unlock(&ip->i_flags_lock);
+		return 0;
+	}
+
+	i_size_write(inode, offset + size);
+	spin_unlock(&ip->i_flags_lock);
+
+	return xfs_setfilesize(ip, offset, size);
+}
+
 static int
 xfs_dio_write_end_io(
 	struct kiocb		*iocb,
@@ -623,30 +659,8 @@ xfs_dio_write_end_io(
 	 * with the on-disk inode size being outside the in-core inode size. We
 	 * have no other method of updating EOF for AIO, so always do it here
 	 * if necessary.
-	 *
-	 * We need to lock the test/set EOF update as we can be racing with
-	 * other IO completions here to update the EOF. Failing to serialise
-	 * here can result in EOF moving backwards and Bad Things Happen when
-	 * that occurs.
-	 *
-	 * As IO completion only ever extends EOF, we can do an unlocked check
-	 * here to avoid taking the spinlock. If we land within the current EOF,
-	 * then we do not need to do an extending update at all, and we don't
-	 * need to take the lock to check this. If we race with an update moving
-	 * EOF, then we'll either still be beyond EOF and need to take the lock,
-	 * or we'll be within EOF and we don't need to take it at all.
 	 */
-	if (offset + size <= i_size_read(inode))
-		goto out;
-
-	spin_lock(&ip->i_flags_lock);
-	if (offset + size > i_size_read(inode)) {
-		i_size_write(inode, offset + size);
-		spin_unlock(&ip->i_flags_lock);
-		error = xfs_setfilesize(ip, offset, size);
-	} else {
-		spin_unlock(&ip->i_flags_lock);
-	}
+	error = xfs_dio_endio_set_isize(inode, offset, size);
 
 out:
 	memalloc_nofs_restore(nofs_flag);
-- 
2.53.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 2/4] xfs: factor out xfs_dio_write_zoned_end_io
  2026-03-10 17:36 [PATCH v2 0/4] Zoned device cleanups cem
  2026-03-10 17:36 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] xfs: factor out isize updates from xfs_dio_write_end_io cem
@ 2026-03-10 17:36 ` cem
  2026-03-11  7:03   ` Damien Le Moal
  2026-03-10 17:36 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] xfs: factor out xfs_zone_inc_written cem
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: cem @ 2026-03-10 17:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-xfs; +Cc: hch, dlemoal

From: Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>

Stop sharing direct IO end_io between regular and zoned devices
by factoring out zoned dio end_io to its own function.

Signed-off-by: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

---
v2: Rewrite commit description - no code change

 fs/xfs/xfs_file.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
index fce6be55d90c..7918968e1d62 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
@@ -596,6 +596,36 @@ xfs_dio_endio_set_isize(
 	return xfs_setfilesize(ip, offset, size);
 }
 
+static int
+xfs_zoned_dio_write_end_io(
+	struct kiocb		*iocb,
+	ssize_t			size,
+	int			error,
+	unsigned		flags)
+{
+	struct inode		*inode = file_inode(iocb->ki_filp);
+	struct xfs_inode	*ip = XFS_I(inode);
+	unsigned int		nofs_flag;
+
+	ASSERT(!(flags & (IOMAP_DIO_UNWRITTEN | IOMAP_DIO_COW)));
+
+	trace_xfs_end_io_direct_write(ip, iocb->ki_pos, size);
+
+	if (xfs_is_shutdown(ip->i_mount))
+		return -EIO;
+
+	if (error || !size)
+		return error;
+
+	XFS_STATS_ADD(ip->i_mount, xs_write_bytes, size);
+
+	nofs_flag = memalloc_nofs_save();
+	error = xfs_dio_endio_set_isize(inode, iocb->ki_pos, size);
+	memalloc_nofs_restore(nofs_flag);
+
+	return error;
+}
+
 static int
 xfs_dio_write_end_io(
 	struct kiocb		*iocb,
@@ -608,8 +638,7 @@ xfs_dio_write_end_io(
 	loff_t			offset = iocb->ki_pos;
 	unsigned int		nofs_flag;
 
-	ASSERT(!xfs_is_zoned_inode(ip) ||
-	       !(flags & (IOMAP_DIO_UNWRITTEN | IOMAP_DIO_COW)));
+	ASSERT(!xfs_is_zoned_inode(ip));
 
 	trace_xfs_end_io_direct_write(ip, offset, size);
 
@@ -702,7 +731,7 @@ xfs_dio_zoned_submit_io(
 static const struct iomap_dio_ops xfs_dio_zoned_write_ops = {
 	.bio_set	= &iomap_ioend_bioset,
 	.submit_io	= xfs_dio_zoned_submit_io,
-	.end_io		= xfs_dio_write_end_io,
+	.end_io		= xfs_zoned_dio_write_end_io,
 };
 
 /*
-- 
2.53.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 3/4] xfs: factor out xfs_zone_inc_written
  2026-03-10 17:36 [PATCH v2 0/4] Zoned device cleanups cem
  2026-03-10 17:36 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] xfs: factor out isize updates from xfs_dio_write_end_io cem
  2026-03-10 17:36 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] xfs: factor out xfs_dio_write_zoned_end_io cem
@ 2026-03-10 17:36 ` cem
  2026-03-10 17:36 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] xfs: opencode xfs_zone_record_blocks cem
  2026-03-12  8:37 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] Zoned device cleanups Carlos Maiolino
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: cem @ 2026-03-10 17:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-xfs; +Cc: hch, dlemoal

From: Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>

Move the written blocks increment and full zone check into a new helper.
Also add an assert to ensure rmap lock is held here.

Signed-off-by: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>

---
v2: add RwB tags, no changes

 fs/xfs/xfs_zone_alloc.c | 20 ++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_zone_alloc.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_zone_alloc.c
index e3d19b6dc64a..97149bfc2512 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_zone_alloc.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_zone_alloc.c
@@ -189,6 +189,18 @@ xfs_open_zone_mark_full(
 		xfs_zone_account_reclaimable(rtg, rtg_blocks(rtg) - used);
 }
 
+static inline void
+xfs_zone_inc_written(
+	struct xfs_open_zone	*oz,
+	xfs_filblks_t		len)
+{
+	xfs_assert_ilocked(rtg_rmap(oz->oz_rtg), XFS_ILOCK_EXCL);
+
+	oz->oz_written += len;
+	if (oz->oz_written == rtg_blocks(oz->oz_rtg))
+		xfs_open_zone_mark_full(oz);
+}
+
 static void
 xfs_zone_record_blocks(
 	struct xfs_trans	*tp,
@@ -206,9 +218,7 @@ xfs_zone_record_blocks(
 	xfs_rtgroup_trans_join(tp, rtg, XFS_RTGLOCK_RMAP);
 	rmapip->i_used_blocks += len;
 	ASSERT(rmapip->i_used_blocks <= rtg_blocks(rtg));
-	oz->oz_written += len;
-	if (oz->oz_written == rtg_blocks(rtg))
-		xfs_open_zone_mark_full(oz);
+	xfs_zone_inc_written(oz, len);
 	xfs_trans_log_inode(tp, rmapip, XFS_ILOG_CORE);
 }
 
@@ -227,9 +237,7 @@ xfs_zone_skip_blocks(
 	trace_xfs_zone_skip_blocks(oz, 0, len);
 
 	xfs_rtgroup_lock(rtg, XFS_RTGLOCK_RMAP);
-	oz->oz_written += len;
-	if (oz->oz_written == rtg_blocks(rtg))
-		xfs_open_zone_mark_full(oz);
+	xfs_zone_inc_written(oz, len);
 	xfs_rtgroup_unlock(rtg, XFS_RTGLOCK_RMAP);
 
 	xfs_add_frextents(rtg_mount(rtg), len);
-- 
2.53.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 4/4] xfs: opencode xfs_zone_record_blocks
  2026-03-10 17:36 [PATCH v2 0/4] Zoned device cleanups cem
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2026-03-10 17:36 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] xfs: factor out xfs_zone_inc_written cem
@ 2026-03-10 17:36 ` cem
  2026-03-18  8:14   ` Christoph Hellwig
  2026-03-12  8:37 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] Zoned device cleanups Carlos Maiolino
  4 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: cem @ 2026-03-10 17:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-xfs; +Cc: hch, dlemoal

From: Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>

We only have a single caller, no need to keep it in its own function.

Signed-off-by: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>

---
v2: add RwB tags, no changes

 fs/xfs/xfs_zone_alloc.c | 30 ++++++++----------------------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_zone_alloc.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_zone_alloc.c
index 97149bfc2512..7d712d5a5ce0 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_zone_alloc.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_zone_alloc.c
@@ -201,27 +201,6 @@ xfs_zone_inc_written(
 		xfs_open_zone_mark_full(oz);
 }
 
-static void
-xfs_zone_record_blocks(
-	struct xfs_trans	*tp,
-	struct xfs_open_zone	*oz,
-	xfs_fsblock_t		fsbno,
-	xfs_filblks_t		len)
-{
-	struct xfs_mount	*mp = tp->t_mountp;
-	struct xfs_rtgroup	*rtg = oz->oz_rtg;
-	struct xfs_inode	*rmapip = rtg_rmap(rtg);
-
-	trace_xfs_zone_record_blocks(oz, xfs_rtb_to_rgbno(mp, fsbno), len);
-
-	xfs_rtgroup_lock(rtg, XFS_RTGLOCK_RMAP);
-	xfs_rtgroup_trans_join(tp, rtg, XFS_RTGLOCK_RMAP);
-	rmapip->i_used_blocks += len;
-	ASSERT(rmapip->i_used_blocks <= rtg_blocks(rtg));
-	xfs_zone_inc_written(oz, len);
-	xfs_trans_log_inode(tp, rmapip, XFS_ILOG_CORE);
-}
-
 /*
  * Called for blocks that have been written to disk, but not actually linked to
  * an inode, which can happen when garbage collection races with user data
@@ -252,6 +231,8 @@ xfs_zoned_map_extent(
 	xfs_fsblock_t		old_startblock)
 {
 	struct xfs_bmbt_irec	data;
+	struct xfs_rtgroup	*rtg = oz->oz_rtg;
+	struct xfs_inode	*rmapip = rtg_rmap(rtg);
 	int			nmaps = 1;
 	int			error;
 
@@ -310,7 +291,12 @@ xfs_zoned_map_extent(
 		}
 	}
 
-	xfs_zone_record_blocks(tp, oz, new->br_startblock, new->br_blockcount);
+	xfs_rtgroup_lock(rtg, XFS_RTGLOCK_RMAP);
+	xfs_rtgroup_trans_join(tp, rtg, XFS_RTGLOCK_RMAP);
+	rmapip->i_used_blocks += new->br_blockcount;
+	ASSERT(rmapip->i_used_blocks <= rtg_blocks(rtg));
+	xfs_zone_inc_written(oz, new->br_blockcount);
+	xfs_trans_log_inode(tp, rmapip, XFS_ILOG_CORE);
 
 	/* Map the new blocks into the data fork. */
 	xfs_bmap_map_extent(tp, ip, XFS_DATA_FORK, new);
-- 
2.53.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] xfs: factor out isize updates from xfs_dio_write_end_io
  2026-03-10 17:36 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] xfs: factor out isize updates from xfs_dio_write_end_io cem
@ 2026-03-11  7:03   ` Damien Le Moal
  2026-03-12  6:52   ` Christoph Hellwig
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Damien Le Moal @ 2026-03-11  7:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: cem, linux-xfs; +Cc: hch

On 2026/03/10 18:36, cem@kernel.org wrote:
> From: Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>
> 
> This is the only code needed for zoned inodes, so factor it out so
> we can move zoned inodes ioend to its own callback.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com>

Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>


-- 
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] xfs: factor out xfs_dio_write_zoned_end_io
  2026-03-10 17:36 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] xfs: factor out xfs_dio_write_zoned_end_io cem
@ 2026-03-11  7:03   ` Damien Le Moal
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Damien Le Moal @ 2026-03-11  7:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: cem, linux-xfs; +Cc: hch

On 2026/03/10 18:36, cem@kernel.org wrote:
> From: Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>
> 
> Stop sharing direct IO end_io between regular and zoned devices
> by factoring out zoned dio end_io to its own function.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>


-- 
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] xfs: factor out isize updates from xfs_dio_write_end_io
  2026-03-10 17:36 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] xfs: factor out isize updates from xfs_dio_write_end_io cem
  2026-03-11  7:03   ` Damien Le Moal
@ 2026-03-12  6:52   ` Christoph Hellwig
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2026-03-12  6:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: cem; +Cc: linux-xfs, hch, dlemoal

Looks good:

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Zoned device cleanups
  2026-03-10 17:36 [PATCH v2 0/4] Zoned device cleanups cem
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2026-03-10 17:36 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] xfs: opencode xfs_zone_record_blocks cem
@ 2026-03-12  8:37 ` Carlos Maiolino
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Carlos Maiolino @ 2026-03-12  8:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-xfs, cem; +Cc: hch, dlemoal

On Tue, 10 Mar 2026 18:36:45 +0100, cem@kernel.org wrote:
> From: Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>
> 
> This is the V2 of this series, which implement changes suggested by
> Damien and Christoph on the V1.
> 
> Only changes are on patches 1 and 2.
> 
> [...]

Applied to for-next, thanks!

[1/4] xfs: factor out isize updates from xfs_dio_write_end_io
      commit: db8367f63b301bbdff6eb00c2e09fad4f2ae75e9
[2/4] xfs: factor out xfs_dio_write_zoned_end_io
      commit: 02a5d8993b09fe9a6754e57d0e25399baffe9a06
[3/4] xfs: factor out xfs_zone_inc_written
      commit: 3bdc20b005c20ce1bf9b098d1ee2caa1d994141e
[4/4] xfs: opencode xfs_zone_record_blocks
      commit: 54514abb9891eb35033608e0fb51809f5a4c07ff

Best regards,
-- 
Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] xfs: opencode xfs_zone_record_blocks
  2026-03-10 17:36 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] xfs: opencode xfs_zone_record_blocks cem
@ 2026-03-18  8:14   ` Christoph Hellwig
  2026-03-18  8:33     ` Carlos Maiolino
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2026-03-18  8:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: cem; +Cc: linux-xfs, hch, dlemoal

On Tue, Mar 10, 2026 at 06:36:49PM +0100, cem@kernel.org wrote:
> From: Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>
> 
> We only have a single caller, no need to keep it in its own function.

This accidentally dropped the record_blocks trace event.  The patch
below adds it back.  Feel free to fold it in if that works for you.

---
From 6e413887a36cd91af3684d8af357b50538106bea Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2026 08:58:38 +0100
Subject: xfs: add back the xfs_zone_record_blocks trace event

Commit 54514abb9891 ("xfs: opencode xfs_zone_record_blocks")
accidentally removed it.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
 fs/xfs/xfs_zone_alloc.c | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_zone_alloc.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_zone_alloc.c
index 7d712d5a5ce0..9d02160c5334 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_zone_alloc.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_zone_alloc.c
@@ -291,6 +291,9 @@ xfs_zoned_map_extent(
 		}
 	}
 
+	trace_xfs_zone_record_blocks(oz,
+		xfs_rtb_to_rgbno(tp->t_mountp, new->br_startblock),
+		new->br_blockcount);
 	xfs_rtgroup_lock(rtg, XFS_RTGLOCK_RMAP);
 	xfs_rtgroup_trans_join(tp, rtg, XFS_RTGLOCK_RMAP);
 	rmapip->i_used_blocks += new->br_blockcount;
-- 
2.47.3


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] xfs: opencode xfs_zone_record_blocks
  2026-03-18  8:14   ` Christoph Hellwig
@ 2026-03-18  8:33     ` Carlos Maiolino
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Carlos Maiolino @ 2026-03-18  8:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Christoph Hellwig; +Cc: linux-xfs, dlemoal

On Wed, Mar 18, 2026 at 09:14:31AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2026 at 06:36:49PM +0100, cem@kernel.org wrote:
> > From: Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>
> > 
> > We only have a single caller, no need to keep it in its own function.
> 
> This accidentally dropped the record_blocks trace event.  The patch
> below adds it back.  Feel free to fold it in if that works for you.

Woops, thanks. I'm folding it into the original patch adding a small
note there.
Thanks!

> 
> ---
> From 6e413887a36cd91af3684d8af357b50538106bea Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2026 08:58:38 +0100
> Subject: xfs: add back the xfs_zone_record_blocks trace event
> 
> Commit 54514abb9891 ("xfs: opencode xfs_zone_record_blocks")
> accidentally removed it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
>  fs/xfs/xfs_zone_alloc.c | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_zone_alloc.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_zone_alloc.c
> index 7d712d5a5ce0..9d02160c5334 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_zone_alloc.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_zone_alloc.c
> @@ -291,6 +291,9 @@ xfs_zoned_map_extent(
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> +	trace_xfs_zone_record_blocks(oz,
> +		xfs_rtb_to_rgbno(tp->t_mountp, new->br_startblock),
> +		new->br_blockcount);
>  	xfs_rtgroup_lock(rtg, XFS_RTGLOCK_RMAP);
>  	xfs_rtgroup_trans_join(tp, rtg, XFS_RTGLOCK_RMAP);
>  	rmapip->i_used_blocks += new->br_blockcount;
> -- 
> 2.47.3
> 
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2026-03-18  8:33 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-03-10 17:36 [PATCH v2 0/4] Zoned device cleanups cem
2026-03-10 17:36 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] xfs: factor out isize updates from xfs_dio_write_end_io cem
2026-03-11  7:03   ` Damien Le Moal
2026-03-12  6:52   ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-10 17:36 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] xfs: factor out xfs_dio_write_zoned_end_io cem
2026-03-11  7:03   ` Damien Le Moal
2026-03-10 17:36 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] xfs: factor out xfs_zone_inc_written cem
2026-03-10 17:36 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] xfs: opencode xfs_zone_record_blocks cem
2026-03-18  8:14   ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-18  8:33     ` Carlos Maiolino
2026-03-12  8:37 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] Zoned device cleanups Carlos Maiolino

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox