From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Long Li <leo.lilong@huawei.com>
Cc: cem@kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, david@fromorbit.com,
yi.zhang@huawei.com, houtao1@huawei.com, yangerkun@huawei.com,
lonuxli.64@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] xfs: fix ri_total validation in xlog_recover_attri_commit_pass2
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2026 15:39:21 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260316223921.GD1770774@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260316012416.2413909-3-leo.lilong@huawei.com>
On Mon, Mar 16, 2026 at 09:24:15AM +0800, Long Li wrote:
> The ri_total checks for SET/REPLACE operations are hardcoded to 3,
> but xfs_attri_item_size() only emits a value iovec when value_len > 0,
> so ri_total is 2 when value_len == 0.
When can you have a set/replace operation with no value? Is this the
weird case where you're trying to set an attr to zero-length buffer?
--D
> For PPTR_SET/PPTR_REMOVE/PPTR_REPLACE, value_len is validated by
> xfs_attri_validate() to be exactly sizeof(struct xfs_parent_rec) and
> is never zero, so their hardcoded checks remain correct.
>
> Fix this by deriving the expected count dynamically as "2 + !!value_len"
> for SET/REPLACE operations.
>
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.9
> Fixes: ad206ae50eca ("xfs: check opcode and iovec count match in xlog_recover_attri_commit_pass2")
> Signed-off-by: Long Li <leo.lilong@huawei.com>
> ---
> fs/xfs/xfs_attr_item.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_attr_item.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_attr_item.c
> index 3d3ac8dad519..21da995ba4e7 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_attr_item.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_attr_item.c
> @@ -1049,7 +1049,7 @@ xlog_recover_attri_commit_pass2(
> case XFS_ATTRI_OP_FLAGS_SET:
> case XFS_ATTRI_OP_FLAGS_REPLACE:
> /* Log item, attr name, attr value */
> - if (item->ri_total != 3) {
> + if (item->ri_total != 2 + !!attri_formatp->alfi_value_len) {
> XFS_CORRUPTION_ERROR(__func__, XFS_ERRLEVEL_LOW, mp,
> attri_formatp, len);
> return -EFSCORRUPTED;
> --
> 2.39.2
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-16 22:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-16 1:24 [PATCH 0/3] xfs: fixes and clean up for attr item Long Li
2026-03-16 1:24 ` [PATCH 1/3] xfs: fix possible null pointer dereference in xfs_attri_recover_work Long Li
2026-03-16 22:33 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-03-17 2:19 ` Long Li
2026-03-16 1:24 ` [PATCH 2/3] xfs: fix ri_total validation in xlog_recover_attri_commit_pass2 Long Li
2026-03-16 22:39 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2026-03-17 2:14 ` Long Li
2026-03-16 1:24 ` [PATCH 3/3] xfs: simplify iovec " Long Li
2026-03-16 22:46 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-03-17 2:33 ` Long Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260316223921.GD1770774@frogsfrogsfrogs \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=cem@kernel.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=houtao1@huawei.com \
--cc=leo.lilong@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lonuxli.64@gmail.com \
--cc=yangerkun@huawei.com \
--cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox