From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Tal Zussman <tz2294@columbia.edu>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Dave Chinner <dgc@kernel.org>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] RFC: use a TASK_FIFO kthread for read completion support
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2026 08:19:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260410061953.GA24795@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2cdaa767-c071-4e84-b9d7-1c944407f5bb@columbia.edu>
On Thu, Apr 09, 2026 at 03:06:47PM -0400, Tal Zussman wrote:
> > -#include <linux/llist.h>
> > +#include <linux/freezer.h>
>
> Why freezer.h and not kthread.h?
I needed freezer.h to try to make the thread freezable, but that didn't
work out. kthread.h seems to be pulled in implicitly.
> > struct bio_complete_batch {
> > - struct llist_head list;
>
> If we go with this approach, we should remove the newly-added bi_llist from
> struct bio too.
Yes.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-10 6:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-09 16:02 bio completion in task enhancements / experiments Christoph Hellwig
2026-04-09 16:02 ` [PATCH 1/8] block: add BIO_COMPLETE_IN_TASK for task-context completion Christoph Hellwig
2026-04-09 16:02 ` [PATCH 2/8] iomap: use BIO_COMPLETE_IN_TASK for dropbehind writeback Christoph Hellwig
2026-04-09 16:02 ` [PATCH 3/8] block: enable RWF_DONTCACHE for block devices Christoph Hellwig
2026-04-09 16:02 ` [PATCH 4/8] FOLD: block: change the defer in task context interface to be procedural Christoph Hellwig
2026-04-09 20:18 ` Matthew Wilcox
2026-04-10 6:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-04-10 13:26 ` Matthew Wilcox
2026-04-09 16:02 ` [PATCH 5/8] FOLD: don't use in_task() to decide for offloading Christoph Hellwig
2026-04-09 16:02 ` [PATCH 6/8] iomap: use bio_complete_in_task for buffered read errors Christoph Hellwig
2026-04-09 16:02 ` [PATCH 7/8] iomap: use bio_complete_in_task for buffered write completions Christoph Hellwig
2026-04-09 16:02 ` [PATCH 8/8] RFC: use a TASK_FIFO kthread for read completion support Christoph Hellwig
2026-04-09 19:06 ` Tal Zussman
2026-04-10 6:19 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260410061953.GA24795@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=cem@kernel.org \
--cc=dgc@kernel.org \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tz2294@columbia.edu \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox