From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 806263438A7; Tue, 19 May 2026 17:58:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779213487; cv=none; b=N/MprGAJ8AILufHMlL/L6uAXpf2Z8ccUgg6IMa4SPufRty7pLCfC6YH4RsGpE97S0kzNttWcAr4+3S+pThj8i816UWI/ndBNPr5NFeovt9PSR067KMw+tLD2M31b91wm050/SYZJ83eG2At6B84pIBc1oDESFMdSDVQJv4e6fqw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779213487; c=relaxed/simple; bh=3If0TDMD8JQ7Q4SNEMQ9CCs/awwZxgs/+1f0vyFJ2tk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=oh7Wydym8wWD1lebzzWhK6c4RV004IwBDMgNkzVJUvS5RokAdTKYh+m/ai/NTSTW22timdrxP+BNJgBg1Ddsiy98USTdZV5V5+5qj9xm7tGaVdDIWqNi1p+Sf0l8A10ngkQcbibeSJt8U2Tmd8fYoHWPnRAV2AWr6OhcGRTz82M= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=WxVkSSY4; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="WxVkSSY4" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2E233C2BCB3; Tue, 19 May 2026 17:58:07 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1779213487; bh=3If0TDMD8JQ7Q4SNEMQ9CCs/awwZxgs/+1f0vyFJ2tk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=WxVkSSY42SVGVHPzta6/0T37RyBOXYgWV7RurVGzR0XNGZzsLvtlLuvcc6z1O++Ji OTgDAxA/ptG+zj29vb4ioOGLjEqeaRTrP7ZsXFZLyAwPCsDOJ/5PYALs6/wV2zjNvj oLQ1GmmuWFpXsnxWAJe/veGJNNST8NyzKeAezgYlAP05ONGdBdrTVa/3eGbidY/rPV kbVQ7AdiobYsXA/9XaarF68OBTaLhNhM4hyLwSOWRqsSb/ZMYq4VI8cuu5gov4ffAS punm0gjIeBbI5rbsM5e+LNRkERPxLPL+m/ABDUxmhAF47RqONKX2FNdFw/ZPNBcbdg Jso39rwlSo8Kg== Date: Tue, 19 May 2026 17:58:05 +0000 From: Eric Biggers To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Carlos Maiolino , fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] generic: add a test that stresses metadata eviction Message-ID: <20260519175805.GA1875993@google.com> References: <20260518062514.506071-1-hch@lst.de> <20260519083758.GA15916@lst.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260519083758.GA15916@lst.de> On Tue, May 19, 2026 at 10:37:58AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, May 19, 2026 at 03:03:37AM +0800, Zorro Lang wrote: > > On Mon, May 18, 2026 at 02:27:42PM +0200, Carlos Maiolino wrote: > > > On Mon, May 18, 2026 at 08:24:53AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > > The fsverity test generic/759 could be used to reproduce a regression in > > ^^^ > > 579 > > Yeah. > > > Hmm... Generally, we state which case was copied/forked from in the introductory > > comments of the case and in the commit log. If you want to specifically mention > > the original author, I think we can add a dedicated line in the commit log, for > > example: > > If Eric is fine with that I can stick to the normal rule. > > > What do you and others think? > > I don't really care at all. I just want to make sure I don't smub > everyone involved with this the wrong way :) The patch looks fine as-is (other than the typo already pointed out). It already preserves the original copyright line and has a comment "# Based on generic/579 with the fsverity bits stripped out". I don't need any additional credit. Thanks, - Eric