From: Usama Arif <usama.arif@linux.dev>
To: brauner@kernel.org, jack@suse.cz, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: hughd@google.com, boris@bur.io, clm@fb.com, dsterba@suse.com,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, cem@kernel.org,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, shakeel.butt@linux.dev,
hannes@cmpxchg.org, riel@surriel.com, kernel-team@meta.com,
Usama Arif <usama.arif@linux.dev>
Subject: [PATCH] fs/super: skip non-memcg-aware nr_cached_objects in memcg slab shrink
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2026 05:30:47 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260609123047.1948242-1-usama.arif@linux.dev> (raw)
The super_block shrinker is registered with SHRINKER_MEMCG_AWARE because its
dentry and inode LRUs are memcg-aware (via list_lru). But the optional
->nr_cached_objects() hooks that the shrinker also drives are not memcg-aware:
btrfs extent maps and xfs inode reclaim operate on filesystem-global
state, and shmem's unused-huge shrinker walks a per-superblock shrinklist.
None of them filter by sc->memcg.
The mismatch shows up under memcg-heavy slab reclaim. shrink_slab_memcg()
calls do_shrink_slab() once per (memcg, NUMA node) pair for every memcg
whose bit is set in the per-superblock shrinker bitmap, which on a busy
host means hundreds of calls per reclaim pass. Each scan queues the same
global shrinker work item that's already kicked from the root path.
Because btrfs/xfs global count is typically non-zero on any in-use filesystem,
the returned total stays positive even if a memcg's own dentry/inode LRUs
are empty. shrink_slab_memcg() therefore never clears the SB shrinker bit
in the memcg bitmap, so subsequent reclaim passes from the same memcg
re-enter super_cache_count() and pay for the global counter walk again.
Restrict ->nr_cached_objects() to the global shrink path (sc->memcg NULL
or root). The memcg-aware dentry/inode LRUs keep being counted and
scanned per memcg as before; only the global fs-specific hooks are skipped.
The root/global shrink path still drives those hooks; only their
invocation from non-root memcg slab reclaim is removed.
Signed-off-by: Usama Arif <usama.arif@linux.dev>
---
fs/super.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/super.c b/fs/super.c
index 378e81efe643..5216c5dbd4c4 100644
--- a/fs/super.c
+++ b/fs/super.c
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
#include <linux/export.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/blkdev.h>
+#include <linux/memcontrol.h>
#include <linux/mount.h>
#include <linux/security.h>
#include <linux/writeback.h> /* for the emergency remount stuff */
@@ -169,6 +170,19 @@ static void super_wake(struct super_block *sb, unsigned int flag)
wake_up_var(&sb->s_flags);
}
+/*
+ * The s_op->nr_cached_objects hooks (used for example by btrfs and xfs)
+ * operate on filesystem-global state and ignore sc->memcg. Driving them
+ * from per-memcg shrink_slab_memcg() invocations only burns CPU walking
+ * per-cpu counters and queueing duplicate work: the actual reclaim happens on
+ * the global path (kswapd or root direct reclaim) regardless. Restrict them
+ * to that path.
+ */
+static inline bool super_fs_objects_eligible(struct shrink_control *sc)
+{
+ return !sc->memcg || mem_cgroup_is_root(sc->memcg);
+}
+
/*
* One thing we have to be careful of with a per-sb shrinker is that we don't
* drop the last active reference to the superblock from within the shrinker.
@@ -198,7 +212,7 @@ static unsigned long super_cache_scan(struct shrinker *shrink,
if (!super_trylock_shared(sb))
return SHRINK_STOP;
- if (sb->s_op->nr_cached_objects)
+ if (sb->s_op->nr_cached_objects && super_fs_objects_eligible(sc))
fs_objects = sb->s_op->nr_cached_objects(sb, sc);
inodes = list_lru_shrink_count(&sb->s_inode_lru, sc);
@@ -259,7 +273,8 @@ static unsigned long super_cache_count(struct shrinker *shrink,
return 0;
smp_rmb();
- if (sb->s_op && sb->s_op->nr_cached_objects)
+ if (sb->s_op && sb->s_op->nr_cached_objects &&
+ super_fs_objects_eligible(sc))
total_objects = sb->s_op->nr_cached_objects(sb, sc);
total_objects += list_lru_shrink_count(&sb->s_dentry_lru, sc);
--
2.52.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-06-09 12:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-09 12:30 Usama Arif [this message]
2026-06-09 12:52 ` [PATCH] fs/super: skip non-memcg-aware nr_cached_objects in memcg slab shrink Jan Kara
2026-06-09 13:38 ` Usama Arif
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260609123047.1948242-1-usama.arif@linux.dev \
--to=usama.arif@linux.dev \
--cc=boris@bur.io \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=cem@kernel.org \
--cc=clm@fb.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox