Re: [PATCH 1/2] xfs: fix inode ref leak in attr intent recovery

["Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>]

On Tue, Jun 09, 2026 at 07:16:18PM +0800, Yingjie Gao wrote:
> xfs_attri_recover_work() grabs the target inode, attaches it to the
> reconstructed attr work item, and adds that work item to the defer
> pending list.
> 
> If xfs_attr_recover_work() fails to allocate the recovery transaction,
> it returns immediately without dropping the inode reference.  The later
> cancel path only frees the attr work item state, so the inode reference
> leaks.
> 
> Release the inode before returning the transaction allocation failure.
> 
> Fixes: e70fb328d527 ("xfs: recreate work items when recovering intent items")
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.8
> Signed-off-by: Yingjie Gao <gaoyingjie@uniontech.com>
> ---
>  fs/xfs/xfs_attr_item.c | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_attr_item.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_attr_item.c
> index deab14f31b38..c3d96c7a5bca 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_attr_item.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_attr_item.c
> @@ -773,8 +773,10 @@ xfs_attr_recover_work(
>  	}
>  	resv = xlog_recover_resv(&resv);
>  	error = xfs_trans_alloc(mp, &resv, total, 0, XFS_TRANS_RESERVE, &tp);
> -	if (error)
> +	if (error) {
> +		xfs_irele(ip);

Seems fine but I wonder why you don't just add an out_rele label on the
line above the existing xfs_irele() call and make this goto there?

--D

>  		return error;
> +	}
>  	args->trans = tp;
>  
>  	xfs_ilock(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL);
> -- 
> 2.20.1
> 
>