From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90D84524F for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2026 22:31:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1782426715; cv=none; b=Vti7DwDYwKtA9/NyLQePY3fFltLKcxdwZ3TiuEgKkVbkDf0htC+nB2ZTbf03CZDrlMoiCxTCXsWq6Ojdm2sy3d1wgjMV3gtnuJyROQesVULIJQ3UDniT9fceH3yTbv4ogfizS2lPqwR1veP3EhibDF4wjpgAzE0G93a2vuc8gds= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1782426715; c=relaxed/simple; bh=axb9/p6/ORG17VHOF7Y0oqd8EJ0uVlB+xz5Gm0dBY7c=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=FXY50Q3XF9K/BuYJ2PFtGN2GU+gewkDKdl1hMJkE4ItFquE91Nguhr/MhP4HLN+oa897GaeEtv7YtHddQkFwtSi3GLzPMUKrvBuwYMWgfdSJXLOx/wnc271rXoCQbu3gYi8ibuNAldi2o3D9RcAarpvVYMnQNxUfieHffF/sxK4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=i4yDwKza; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="i4yDwKza" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with UTF8SMTPSA id 2958E1F000E9; Thu, 25 Jun 2026 22:31:54 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1782426714; bh=DjwjrIHvptxuHC/DU3mQBI6MKrSyioexDWUB3x75LMA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=i4yDwKzaVbCMofFSrEAkjRTp6ekOQKagDXsdfamDH8bPNb+mqN7ZJaUXGEegpLD7I OonUaLlcy5X7doyT8TWU/VMMgzQFWJ8VZQWvYz6ApO2cj4pz9UL5tnCF1Vq1JSK0OI mdwAT/ArfJG3Bkxm5JcWwEjuQKPhMSNhLvWU2dvGu2RDHEparRd0ptrVmUQFvwBh6V 2QxcFZ1gml4YNg+T6KLaZ+gVwYFKVH70rAEXnxwCUkWg54XygCS+dl7GdzXwPjOrf1 0ePBghS5w0YmwXNghgDHkSLMMtIhEHUuHYNkOksbSC9/R5mGvOqTh6rlmpokVaJL8L BwV26Zjhwindw== Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2026 15:31:53 -0700 From: "Darrick J. Wong" To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: aalbersh@kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/11] xfs_scrub: track inode scan abort state with an enum Message-ID: <20260625223153.GL6078@frogsfrogsfrogs> References: <178232484383.915780.8675173410074139317.stgit@frogsfrogsfrogs> <178232484512.915780.15261436223285476643.stgit@frogsfrogsfrogs> <20260625120213.GE18766@lst.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260625120213.GE18766@lst.de> On Thu, Jun 25, 2026 at 02:02:13PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Jun 24, 2026 at 11:15:33AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > From: Darrick J. Wong > > > > Change this from a boolean to an enum so that we can handle scan > > cancellations correctly in the next patch. > > Where that means adding a new member to the enum I guess? I'd probaby Yep. > merge the patches for easier understanding, but the change itself does > look ok: > > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig Thanks! --D