Linux XFS filesystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: aalbersh@kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, hch@lst.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] mkfs: fix hardlink detection in directory import code
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2026 07:38:52 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260630053852.GD21007@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <178278129879.858323.12870914276080297674.stgit@frogsfrogsfrogs>

On Mon, Jun 29, 2026 at 06:03:41PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> From: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
> 
> There's a serious problem in the hardlink detection code in the new mkfs
> protofile functionality that copies a directory tree into the new
> filesystem.  It's been long established that hardlinks can only be
> detected by comparing st_ino *and* st_dev, but the new code doesn't do
> that.

Yes.

> Fix the detector, and stop passing struct stat objects by
> value(!) since they are quite large.

Without looking at the code I suspect the compiler silently passes
them by references as long as the functions are static, but it's
still good to fix this up.

>  static void
>  writetimestamps(
>  	struct xfs_inode	*ip,
> -	struct stat		*statbuf)
> +	const struct stat	*statbuf)

It also seems to constify a few things :)

> -	hardlink_tracker.entries[hardlink_tracker.count].src_ino = src_ino;
> +	hardlink_tracker.entries[hardlink_tracker.count].src_dev = filestat->st_dev;
> +	hardlink_tracker.entries[hardlink_tracker.count].src_ino = filestat->st_ino;
>  	hardlink_tracker.entries[hardlink_tracker.count].dst_ino = dst_ino;

A bunch of overly long lines.  This would probably benefit from
a local variable for the tracker entry.

Otherwise looks good, although I would have split it into a few patches.

  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-30  5:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-30  1:02 [PATCHSET 2/4] mkfs.xfs: codex-inspired bug fixes Darrick J. Wong
2026-06-30  1:02 ` [PATCH 1/6] mkfs: don't redefine DIRT for protofiles Darrick J. Wong
2026-06-30  5:31   ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-06-30  1:03 ` [PATCH 2/6] mkfs: fix PATH_MAX check Darrick J. Wong
2026-06-30  5:31   ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-06-30  1:03 ` [PATCH 3/6] mkfs: fix symlink target length check in create_nondir_inode Darrick J. Wong
2026-06-30  5:34   ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-06-30  1:03 ` [PATCH 4/6] mkfs: fix hardlink detection in directory import code Darrick J. Wong
2026-06-30  5:38   ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2026-06-30 16:28     ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-06-30  1:03 ` [PATCH 5/6] mkfs: PQUOTA shouldn't conflict with GQNOENFORCE Darrick J. Wong
2026-06-30  5:41   ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-06-30 16:27     ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-06-30  1:04 ` [PATCH 6/6] xfs_protofile: make nondirectory arguments actually work Darrick J. Wong
2026-06-30  5:45   ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260630053852.GD21007@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=aalbersh@kernel.org \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox