Linux XFS filesystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Aldo Ariel Panzardo <qwe.aldo@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: reject remote xattr entries with an out-of-range value length
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2026 09:36:09 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260707163609.GB9392@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260707140118.3217585-1-qwe.aldo@gmail.com>

On Tue, Jul 07, 2026 at 11:01:18AM -0300, Aldo Ariel Panzardo wrote:
> xfs_attr3_leaf_verify_entry() validates a remote attribute entry's name
> but never bounds its on-disk value length (xfs_attr_leaf_name_remote.
> valuelen, a __be32). A crafted leaf with valuelen = 0x80000000 passes
> the verifier and the CRC.
> 
> That length is later assigned into the signed int args->rmtvaluelen
> (xfs_attr3_leaf_getvalue), becoming negative, which slips past the signed
> -ERANGE check in xfs_attr_copy_value(); a getxattr() with a small buffer

Shouldn't you fix the signed value check in xfs_attr_copy_value, then?

> then memcpy()s a full remote block into the small kvalue buffer
> (xfs_attr_rmtval_copyout) -- a heap out-of-bounds write with
> attacker-controlled content, from an unprivileged getxattr(2) on a
> mounted crafted image.
> 
> Reject remote entries whose value length exceeds XFS_XATTR_SIZE_MAX in
> the leaf verifier, so the malicious block is rejected at read time.
> 
> Fixes: c84760659dcf ("xfs: check attribute leaf block structure")
> Signed-off-by: Aldo Ariel Panzardo <qwe.aldo@gmail.com>

This ought to cc stable.

> ---
>  fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr_leaf.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr_leaf.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr_leaf.c
> index 86c5c09a5db4..f1769289f908 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr_leaf.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr_leaf.c
> @@ -339,6 +339,8 @@ xfs_attr3_leaf_verify_entry(
>  		if (!(ent->flags & XFS_ATTR_INCOMPLETE) &&
>  		    rentry->valueblk == 0)
>  			return __this_address;
> +		if (be32_to_cpu(rentry->valuelen) > XFS_XATTR_SIZE_MAX)
> +			return __this_address;

This looks correct though.

--D

>  	}
>  
>  	if (name_end > buf_end)
> -- 
> 2.43.0
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-07 16:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-07 14:01 [PATCH] xfs: reject remote xattr entries with an out-of-range value length Aldo Ariel Panzardo
2026-07-07 16:36 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2026-07-07 19:00 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] xfs: fix out-of-range remote xattr " Aldo Ariel Panzardo
2026-07-07 19:00   ` [PATCH v2 1/2] xfs: reject out-of-range attribute value lengths in xfs_attr_copy_value Aldo Ariel Panzardo
2026-07-07 19:00   ` [PATCH v2 2/2] xfs: reject remote xattr entries with an out-of-range value length Aldo Ariel Panzardo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260707163609.GB9392@frogsfrogsfrogs \
    --to=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=cem@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=qwe.aldo@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox