From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/12] xfs: merge xfs_buf_reverify into xfs_buf_read_map
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2026 09:58:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260724165854.GX2901224@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260715145147.95654-11-hch@lst.de>
On Wed, Jul 15, 2026 at 04:51:03PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> xfs_buf_read_map is the only caller of xfs_buf_reverify that is left.
> Merge it into that so that the comments can be moved closer to the
> logic, and redundant asserts can be removed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
> fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
> 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
> index 21c21491d72e..be3b25ccbea6 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
> @@ -626,41 +626,6 @@ _xfs_buf_read(
> return xfs_buf_iowait(bp);
> }
>
> -/*
> - * Reverify a buffer found in cache without an attached ->b_ops.
> - *
> - * If the caller passed an ops structure and the buffer doesn't have ops
> - * assigned, set the ops and use it to verify the contents. If verification
> - * fails, clear XBF_DONE. We assume the buffer has no recorded errors and is
> - * already in XBF_DONE state on entry.
> - *
> - * Under normal operations, every in-core buffer is verified on read I/O
> - * completion. There are two scenarios that can lead to in-core buffers without
> - * an assigned ->b_ops. The first is during log recovery of buffers on a V4
> - * filesystem, though these buffers are purged at the end of recovery. The
> - * other is online repair, which intentionally reads with a NULL buffer ops to
> - * run several verifiers across an in-core buffer in order to establish buffer
> - * type. If repair can't establish that, the buffer will be left in memory
> - * with NULL buffer ops.
> - */
> -static int
> -xfs_buf_reverify(
> - struct xfs_buf *bp,
> - const struct xfs_buf_ops *ops)
> -{
> - ASSERT(bp->b_flags & XBF_DONE);
> - ASSERT(bp->b_error == 0);
> -
> - if (!ops || bp->b_ops)
> - return 0;
> -
> - bp->b_ops = ops;
> - bp->b_ops->verify_read(bp);
> - if (bp->b_error)
> - xfs_buf_clear_flags(bp, XBF_DONE);
> - return bp->b_error;
> -}
> -
> int
> xfs_buf_read_map(
> struct xfs_buftarg *target,
> @@ -685,18 +650,46 @@ xfs_buf_read_map(
>
> trace_xfs_buf_read(bp, flags, _RET_IP_);
>
> - if (!(bp->b_flags & XBF_DONE)) {
> + if (bp->b_flags & XBF_DONE) {
> + ASSERT(bp->b_error == 0);
> +
> + /*
> + * If the caller passed an ops structure and the buffer doesn't
> + * have ops assigned yet, set the ops and use them to verify the
> + * buffer contents.
> + *
> + * Under normal operations, every in-core buffer is verified on
> + * read I/O completion, but there are two scenarios that can
> + * lead to in-core buffers without an assigned ->b_ops:
> + *
> + * 1) During log recovery of buffers on a V4 filesystem.
> + * These buffers are purged at the end of recovery, though.
> + * 2) Oonline repair intentionally reads with a NULL buffer
s/Oonline/Online/ like bfoster said.
With that fixed,
Reviewed-by: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
--D
> + * ops to run several verifiers across an in-core buffer in
> + * order to establish buffer type. If repair can't
> + * establish that, the buffer will be left in memory with
> + * NULL buffer ops.
> + */
> + if (ops && !bp->b_ops) {
> + bp->b_ops = ops;
> + bp->b_ops->verify_read(bp);
> + /*
> + * If verification failed, clear XBF_DONE as we assume
> + * that buffers have no recorded errors when in XBF_DONE
> + * state.
> + */
> + error = bp->b_error;
> + if (error)
> + xfs_buf_clear_flags(bp, XBF_DONE);
> + }
> +
> + /* We do not want read in the flags */
> + xfs_buf_clear_flags(bp, XBF_READ);
> + } else {
> /* Initiate the buffer read and wait. */
> XFS_STATS_INC(target->bt_mount, xb_get_read);
> bp->b_ops = ops;
> error = _xfs_buf_read(bp);
> - } else {
> - /* Buffer already read; all we need to do is check it. */
> - error = xfs_buf_reverify(bp, ops);
> -
> - /* We do not want read in the flags */
> - xfs_buf_clear_flags(bp, XBF_READ);
> - ASSERT(bp->b_ops != NULL || ops == NULL);
> }
>
> if (error)
> --
> 2.53.0
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-24 16:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-15 14:50 misc buffer cache improvements Christoph Hellwig
2026-07-15 14:50 ` [PATCH 01/12] xfs: don't get a pag reference in xfs_buf_get_map Christoph Hellwig
2026-07-24 16:32 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-07-15 14:50 ` [PATCH 02/12] xfs: consolidate buffer locking " Christoph Hellwig
2026-07-16 13:12 ` Brian Foster
2026-07-17 8:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-07-17 14:13 ` Brian Foster
2026-07-20 7:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-07-24 16:42 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-07-28 4:38 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-07-15 14:50 ` [PATCH 03/12] xfs: split out a lower-level xfs_buf_get_map helper from xfs_find_get_buf Christoph Hellwig
2026-07-24 16:44 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-07-28 4:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-07-15 14:50 ` [PATCH 04/12] xfs: remove spurious XBF_DONE clearing on readahead validation failure Christoph Hellwig
2026-07-24 16:45 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-07-15 14:50 ` [PATCH 05/12] xfs: remove _XBF_LOGRECOVERY Christoph Hellwig
2026-07-24 16:49 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-07-28 4:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-07-15 14:50 ` [PATCH 06/12] xfs: hide b_flags manipulation from code outside of xfs_buf.c Christoph Hellwig
2026-07-24 16:49 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-07-15 14:51 ` [PATCH 07/12] xfs: use WRITE_ONCE to update b_flags Christoph Hellwig
2026-07-24 16:53 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-07-28 4:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-07-15 14:51 ` [PATCH 08/12] xfs: don't reverify buffers in xfs_buf_readahead_map Christoph Hellwig
2026-07-24 16:56 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-07-15 14:51 ` [PATCH 09/12] xfs: use goto based error unwinding in xfs_buf_read_map Christoph Hellwig
2026-07-24 16:57 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-07-15 14:51 ` [PATCH 10/12] xfs: merge xfs_buf_reverify into xfs_buf_read_map Christoph Hellwig
2026-07-17 14:13 ` Brian Foster
2026-07-24 16:58 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2026-07-15 14:51 ` [PATCH 11/12] xfs: move buffer locking out of xfs_find_get_buf Christoph Hellwig
2026-07-24 16:59 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-07-15 14:51 ` [PATCH 12/12] xfs: add lockless xfs_buf_readahead_map fast path Christoph Hellwig
2026-07-24 17:03 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-07-28 4:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-08-10 11:55 ` misc buffer cache improvements Carlos Maiolino
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-07-28 8:11 misc buffer cache improvements v2 Christoph Hellwig
2026-07-28 8:11 ` [PATCH 10/12] xfs: merge xfs_buf_reverify into xfs_buf_read_map Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260724165854.GX2901224@frogsfrogsfrogs \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=cem@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox