From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6E9E7CBE for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2013 22:41:39 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by relay3.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46066AC001 for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2013 20:41:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from benjamin.baylink.com (rrcs-24-129-180-187.se.biz.rr.com [24.129.180.187]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id TOJtkzRPH62xpHS7 for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2013 20:41:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by benjamin.baylink.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5142C1F00568 for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2013 23:41:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: from benjamin.baylink.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (benjamin.baylink.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 32bfeS6QHY0N for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2013 23:41:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: from benjamin.baylink.com (benjamin.baylink.com [192.168.253.10]) by benjamin.baylink.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1E891F004EF for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2013 23:41:26 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2013 23:41:26 -0400 (EDT) From: Jay Ashworth Message-ID: <22593430.4954.1377402086863.JavaMail.root@benjamin.baylink.com> In-Reply-To: <4336525.4942.1377391265287.JavaMail.root@benjamin.baylink.com> Subject: Re: Default mkfs parms for my DVR drive MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: xfs@oss.sgi.com ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jay Ashworth" > And this latest rsync has gotten 78G and then paused; 80G and then > paused.... > > 84G and then paused... > > 5 min LA 1.9, and the rsync is the top process. > > I have smartd running; no errors yet. > > Still watching... Well, it's now up to 377GB, and it hasn't crashed yet. Since the original FSs and the new one were mkfs'd by different versions of the mkfs program, I suppose it's possible that might have contributed to the crash in some perverted way that running badblocks -w in the middle would definitely prevent. We'll see if it survives the night. Cheers, -- jra -- Jay R. Ashworth Baylink jra@baylink.com Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100 Ashworth & Associates http://baylink.pitas.com 2000 Land Rover DII St Petersburg FL USA #natog +1 727 647 1274 _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs