From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>
Cc: djwong@kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET v2 0/2] Add XFS support for RWF_DONTCACHE
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2025 08:05:15 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <234045ff-87ef-4403-b97e-ef63438ccf2b@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <vc7eqsqiyb2pnom4ekaaxmz4abt535a73bnathq2nxbt3yspoe@fnehin4xmzdu>
On 2/27/25 2:25 AM, Carlos Maiolino wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 10:30:05AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 2/4/25 11:39 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Now that the main bits are in mainline, here are the XFS patches for
>>> adding RWF_DONTCACHE support. It's pretty trivial - patch 1 adds the
>>> basic iomap flag and check, and patch 2 flags FOP_DONTCACHE support
>>> in the file_operations struct. Could be folded into a single patch
>>> at this point, I'll leave that up to you guys what you prefer.
>>>
>>> Patches are aginst 6.14-rc1.
>>>
>>> Since v1:
>>> - Remove stale commit message paragraph
>>> - Add comments for iomap flag from Darrick
>>
>
> Hello Jens
>
>> Is this slated for 6.15? I don't see it in the tree yet, but I also
>> don't see a lot of other things in there. Would be a shame to miss the
>> next release on this front.
>
> The changes looks fine, they are for 6.15, so I don't push things to
> for-next for the next release while working on the current one, I'm
Hmm ok, that seems like an odd choice, surely you'd want things in
for-next earlier rather than later? At least that's what everybody else
is doing.
> not sure I got your point. What else are these 'lot of other things'
> you don't see in there you mentioned?
Oh, it was just a comment on there not seeming to be any xfs changes for
6.15 in your for-next (or other branches) yet, which made me think that
perhaps I was looking in the wrong spot. This where I looked, fwiw:
https://web.git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/xfs/xfs-linux.git/
which does seem to have a few changes for 6.15, but really not much.
Maybe this is all normal for xfs?
--
Jens Axboe
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-27 15:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-04 18:39 [PATCHSET v2 0/2] Add XFS support for RWF_DONTCACHE Jens Axboe
2025-02-04 18:39 ` [PATCH 1/2] iomap: make buffered writes work with RWF_DONTCACHE Jens Axboe
2025-02-20 6:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-02-27 9:51 ` Carlos Maiolino
2025-02-27 10:30 ` Christian Brauner
2025-02-27 10:57 ` Carlos Maiolino
2025-02-27 15:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-02-28 10:38 ` Christian Brauner
2025-03-03 13:07 ` John Garry
2025-03-12 20:40 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2025-02-04 18:40 ` [PATCH 2/2] xfs: flag as supporting FOP_DONTCACHE Jens Axboe
2025-02-04 18:59 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-20 6:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-12 20:42 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2025-02-19 17:12 ` [PATCHSET v2 0/2] Add XFS support for RWF_DONTCACHE Jens Axboe
2025-02-26 17:30 ` Jens Axboe
2025-02-27 9:25 ` Carlos Maiolino
2025-02-27 15:05 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=234045ff-87ef-4403-b97e-ef63438ccf2b@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=cem@kernel.org \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox