public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Usage bigger after copy?
@ 2012-10-15 18:07 Michael Monnerie
  2012-10-15 19:52 ` Wayne Walker
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Michael Monnerie @ 2012-10-15 18:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: xfs


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1810 bytes --]

I know that the speculative prealloc of xfs can make files bigger on a 
destination, but I thought an "echo 3 >/proc/sys/vm/drop_caches" would 
help. I even umounted both filesystems, but the destination is bigger:

sys1 Blocks 8378368 Used 2631368 Avail 5747000
sys2 Blocks 8378368 Used 2966566 Avail 5411812

Both are VMs, have a 16G disk, partitioned same size, both on LVM, 
copied with rsync. xfs_info show the same for both:

meta-data=/dev/mapper/dns1--system-root isize=256    agcount=4, 
agsize=524288 blks
         =                       sectsz=512   attr=2
data     =                       bsize=4096   blocks=2097152, imaxpct=25
         =                       sunit=0      swidth=0 blks
naming   =version 2              bsize=4096   ascii-ci=0
log      =internal               bsize=4096   blocks=2560, version=2
         =                       sectsz=512   sunit=0 blks, lazy-count=1
realtime =none                   extsz=4096   blocks=0, rtextents=0

So why is there such a huge diff in size? 300M, 2.6G:2.9G, is a big 
number. I found these dirs to be very different:

( I rebooted here compared to results before, but same strangeness )
# du -s /1/usr/lib/locale/* /usr/lib/locale/*|sort -n|grep YU
20      /usr/lib/locale/sh_YU.utf8
1760    /1/usr/lib/locale/sh_YU.utf8

But comparing them directly, they are the same:

# du -s /1/usr/lib/locale/sh_YU.utf8 /usr/lib/locale/sh_YU.utf8
1760    /1/usr/lib/locale/sh_YU.utf8
1760    /usr/lib/locale/sh_YU.utf8

So what makes "du" show a huge different when the dir above gets 
scanned, versus when you compare dirs directly?

-- 
mit freundlichen Grüssen,
Michael Monnerie, Ing. BSc

it-management Internet Services: Protéger
http://proteger.at [gesprochen: Prot-e-schee]
Tel: +43 660 / 415 6531

[-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 121 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: Usage bigger after copy?
  2012-10-15 18:07 Usage bigger after copy? Michael Monnerie
@ 2012-10-15 19:52 ` Wayne Walker
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Wayne Walker @ 2012-10-15 19:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: xfs


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2055 bytes --]

Michael,

My guess is that you used rsync but did not use H.

retry your rsync with:

rsync -aHx /usr /1/

H will preseve hard links for you and probably make most of your 
directory size differences go away.

Wayne

On 10/15/2012 01:07 PM, Michael Monnerie wrote:
> I know that the speculative prealloc of xfs can make files bigger on a
> destination, but I thought an "echo 3 >/proc/sys/vm/drop_caches" would
> help. I even umounted both filesystems, but the destination is bigger:
>
> sys1 Blocks 8378368 Used 2631368 Avail 5747000
> sys2 Blocks 8378368 Used 2966566 Avail 5411812
>
> Both are VMs, have a 16G disk, partitioned same size, both on LVM,
> copied with rsync. xfs_info show the same for both:
>
> meta-data=/dev/mapper/dns1--system-root isize=256    agcount=4,
> agsize=524288 blks
>           =                       sectsz=512   attr=2
> data     =                       bsize=4096   blocks=2097152, imaxpct=25
>           =                       sunit=0      swidth=0 blks
> naming   =version 2              bsize=4096   ascii-ci=0
> log      =internal               bsize=4096   blocks=2560, version=2
>           =                       sectsz=512   sunit=0 blks, lazy-count=1
> realtime =none                   extsz=4096   blocks=0, rtextents=0
>
> So why is there such a huge diff in size? 300M, 2.6G:2.9G, is a big
> number. I found these dirs to be very different:
>
> ( I rebooted here compared to results before, but same strangeness )
> # du -s /1/usr/lib/locale/* /usr/lib/locale/*|sort -n|grep YU
> 20      /usr/lib/locale/sh_YU.utf8
> 1760    /1/usr/lib/locale/sh_YU.utf8
>
> But comparing them directly, they are the same:
>
> # du -s /1/usr/lib/locale/sh_YU.utf8 /usr/lib/locale/sh_YU.utf8
> 1760    /1/usr/lib/locale/sh_YU.utf8
> 1760    /usr/lib/locale/sh_YU.utf8
>
> So what makes "du" show a huge different when the dir above gets
> scanned, versus when you compare dirs directly?
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@oss.sgi.com
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs


[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 2703 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 121 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2012-10-15 19:51 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-10-15 18:07 Usage bigger after copy? Michael Monnerie
2012-10-15 19:52 ` Wayne Walker

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox