From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com>
Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25])
	by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id
	n8N07tdZ226082 for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 19:07:55 -0500
Received: from postoffice2.aconex.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 53C5E471C3C
	for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 17:09:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from postoffice2.aconex.com (mail.aconex.com [203.89.202.182]) by
	cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id COgHINFwkTNC4L1y for
	<xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 17:09:11 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 10:08:54 +1000 (EST)
From: Nathan Scott <nscott@aconex.com>
Message-ID: <241547128.01253664531434.JavaMail.root@mail-au.aconex.com>
In-Reply-To: <20090922115707.GA8143@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] xfsprogs build tweaks for Debian
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI <xfs.oss.sgi.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/options/xfs>,
	<mailto:xfs-request@oss.sgi.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://oss.sgi.com/pipermail/xfs>
List-Post: <mailto:xfs@oss.sgi.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xfs-request@oss.sgi.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs>,
	<mailto:xfs-request@oss.sgi.com?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com
Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com

----- "Christoph Hellwig" <hch@infradead.org> wrote:

> The tarball generated by Makepks does not contain .git.  Do you
> create a tarball in a different way for debian?

Building directly from a git tree - its a one-step process.

> 
> would be cleaner as
> 
> #
> # If we're on a Debian or Debian-derived system generate deb packages
> by
> # default, else RPM packages.
> #
> if [ -f /etc/debian_version ]
>     type=debian
> else
>     type=rpm
> fi

OK, yep, will do.

> Note that when you bump package version please always also tag the
> result in git.

Will do (and pull in & document those other merged changes when I do).

> > +	- Debian packaging updates, esp. readline6 dependency.
> 
> Btw, didn't readline move to GPLv3 while we have GPLv2 code in libxfs?

Hmm, not sure, will have to look into that.  The (new) dependency doesn't
specify any particular version, it just allows versions other than 5 ...
but still worth checking into.

thanks!

-- 
Nathan

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs