From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42F057F37 for ; Thu, 7 May 2015 06:48:46 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by relay1.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 341CA8F804B for ; Thu, 7 May 2015 04:48:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.lichtvoll.de (mondschein.lichtvoll.de [194.150.191.11]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id jwEKKfnIZXhwrEew for ; Thu, 07 May 2015 04:48:43 -0700 (PDT) From: Martin Steigerwald Subject: Re: Valid Benchmark Value & Methods Date: Thu, 07 May 2015 13:48:34 +0200 Message-ID: <2424481.0uux1ckym9@merkaba> In-Reply-To: <554B4B59.6000706@xtremenitro.org> References: <554B4B59.6000706@xtremenitro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: xfs@oss.sgi.com Cc: Dewangga Am Donnerstag, 7. Mai 2015, 18:24:09 schrieb Dewangga: > Hello! > > I'm new on XFS and curious about any tune/tweak regarding XFS > filesystem on any raid array, non-raid, ssd or non-ssd. But, is there > any valid value to determine about the performance? At least valid > benchmark result (eg. using fio with some parameters, or any method). > > Then, about bsize, sectsz, etc, is there any wiki/guidelines how to > set them on a right way? Read and understand: http://xfs.org/index.php/XFS_FAQ#Q:_I_want_to_tune_my_XFS_filesystems_for_.3Csomething.3E then, if you want any concrete recommendation ask about your intended setup. Thanks, -- Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7 _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs