From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with SMTP id p37G1J97105005 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2011 11:01:19 -0500 Received: from sam.nabble.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id EE7FA50B3E5 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2011 09:04:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sam.nabble.com (sam.nabble.com [216.139.236.26]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id FL3d8Y1D5gmT2ahg for ; Thu, 07 Apr 2011 09:04:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q7rhD-0001Qx-7Z for linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com; Thu, 07 Apr 2011 09:04:35 -0700 Message-ID: <31342497.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2011 09:04:35 -0700 (PDT) From: stress_buster Subject: xfsprogs MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com Hi, My xfs_repair is bit old- 2.9. version. I'm considering installing latest available. But just worried because this is my production server and has some custom apps built into my OS. Is upgrading xfs_repair a high risk? Also do I need to install latest xfsprogs or anyway only to upgrade xfs_repair from the package? I'm only would need xfs_repair mostly, so doesnt matter to me leaving others-mkfs.xfs etc in xfsprogs at the old version if that minimises the risk... Any thoughts? -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/xfsprogs-tp31342497p31342497.html Sent from the linux-xfs mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs