From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mondschein.lichtvoll.de ([194.150.191.11]:42795 "EHLO mail.lichtvoll.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S936491AbdKQVwt (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Nov 2017 16:52:49 -0500 From: Martin Steigerwald Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 00/27] xfsprogs-4.15: online scrub/repair support Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 22:52:47 +0100 Message-ID: <3371427.NcZX6d9uP5@merkaba> In-Reply-To: <151095240950.4825.6375172010231614655.stgit@magnolia> References: <151095240950.4825.6375172010231614655.stgit@magnolia> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: linux-xfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: List-Id: xfs To: "Darrick J. Wong" Cc: sandeen@redhat.com, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org Hello Darrick. Darrick J. Wong - 17.11.17, 22:00: > If you're going to start using this mess, you probably ought to just > pull from my git tree for xfsprogs[1]. This series relies on the > libfrog patches sent earlier. Kernel support will appear in 4.15-rc1. No extraordinary way to eat your data? I am a tad bit disappointed. Okay, jokes aside: Thank you very much for this work on XFS. Sometimes I would not be surprised if you at one point would even have a go at implementing snapshots for XFS. (Did he actually say the snapshot word. He didnīt, or did he?) Thanks, -- Martin