From: Chandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.ibm.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Chandan Rajendra <chandanrlinux@gmail.com>,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, david@fromorbit.com,
darrick.wong@oracle.com, bfoster@redhat.com, amir73il@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 RESEND 1/7] xfs: Pass xattr name and value length explicitly to xfs_attr_leaf_newentsize
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 14:57:07 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3674803.ahhNVcWJD3@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200226165852.GA10529@infradead.org>
On Wednesday, February 26, 2020 10:28 PM Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr_leaf.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr_leaf.c
> > index fae322105457a..65a3bf40c4f9d 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr_leaf.c
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr_leaf.c
> > @@ -1403,6 +1404,7 @@ xfs_attr3_leaf_add_work(
> > struct xfs_attr_leaf_name_local *name_loc;
> > struct xfs_attr_leaf_name_remote *name_rmt;
> > struct xfs_mount *mp;
> > + int entsize;
> > int tmp;
> > int i;
> >
> > @@ -1432,11 +1434,14 @@ xfs_attr3_leaf_add_work(
> > ASSERT(ichdr->freemap[mapindex].base < args->geo->blksize);
> > ASSERT((ichdr->freemap[mapindex].base & 0x3) == 0);
> > ASSERT(ichdr->freemap[mapindex].size >=
> > - xfs_attr_leaf_newentsize(args, NULL));
> > + xfs_attr_leaf_newentsize(args->geo, args->namelen,
> > + args->valuelen, NULL));
> > ASSERT(ichdr->freemap[mapindex].size < args->geo->blksize);
> > ASSERT((ichdr->freemap[mapindex].size & 0x3) == 0);
> >
> > - ichdr->freemap[mapindex].size -= xfs_attr_leaf_newentsize(args, &tmp);
> > + entsize = xfs_attr_leaf_newentsize(args->geo, args->namelen,
> > + args->valuelen, &tmp);
> > + ichdr->freemap[mapindex].size -= entsize;
>
> As-is this entsize variable is a little pointless. Please move the
> assignment to it up and reuse it in the assert.
>
> > @@ -1824,6 +1829,8 @@ xfs_attr3_leaf_figure_balance(
> > struct xfs_attr_leafblock *leaf1 = blk1->bp->b_addr;
> > struct xfs_attr_leafblock *leaf2 = blk2->bp->b_addr;
> > struct xfs_attr_leaf_entry *entry;
> > + struct xfs_da_args *args;
> > + int entsize;
> > int count;
> > int max;
> > int index;
> > @@ -1833,14 +1840,16 @@ xfs_attr3_leaf_figure_balance(
> > int foundit = 0;
> > int tmp;
> >
> > + args = state->args;
>
> Please assign the value to the variable at the time of declaration.
>
> > /*
> > * Examine entries until we reduce the absolute difference in
> > * byte usage between the two blocks to a minimum.
> > */
> > max = ichdr1->count + ichdr2->count;
> > half = (max + 1) * sizeof(*entry);
> > - half += ichdr1->usedbytes + ichdr2->usedbytes +
> > - xfs_attr_leaf_newentsize(state->args, NULL);
> > + entsize = xfs_attr_leaf_newentsize(args->geo, args->namelen,
> > + args->valuelen, NULL);
> > + half += ichdr1->usedbytes + ichdr2->usedbytes + entsize;
> > half /= 2;
> > lastdelta = state->args->geo->blksize;
> > entry = xfs_attr3_leaf_entryp(leaf1);
> > @@ -1851,8 +1860,9 @@ xfs_attr3_leaf_figure_balance(
> > * The new entry is in the first block, account for it.
> > */
> > if (count == blk1->index) {
> > - tmp = totallen + sizeof(*entry) +
> > - xfs_attr_leaf_newentsize(state->args, NULL);
> > + entsize = xfs_attr_leaf_newentsize(args->geo,
> > + args->namelen, args->valuelen, NULL);
> > + tmp = totallen + sizeof(*entry) + entsize;
> > if (XFS_ATTR_ABS(half - tmp) > lastdelta)
> > break;
> > lastdelta = XFS_ATTR_ABS(half - tmp);
> > @@ -1887,8 +1897,9 @@ xfs_attr3_leaf_figure_balance(
> > */
> > totallen -= count * sizeof(*entry);
> > if (foundit) {
> > - totallen -= sizeof(*entry) +
> > - xfs_attr_leaf_newentsize(state->args, NULL);
> > + entsize = xfs_attr_leaf_newentsize(args->geo, args->namelen,
> > + args->valuelen, NULL);
> > + totallen -= sizeof(*entry) + entsize;
>
> AFAICS there is no need to assign the same value to entsize again and
> again in this function. It should be enough to assign to it once and
> then reuse the value.
>
Sorry about those redundant function calls. I will include the changes
suggested in the next version of the patchset.
--
chandan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-27 9:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-24 4:00 [PATCH V4 RESEND 0/7] Fix log reservation calculation for xattr insert operation Chandan Rajendra
2020-02-24 4:00 ` [PATCH V4 RESEND 1/7] xfs: Pass xattr name and value length explicitly to xfs_attr_leaf_newentsize Chandan Rajendra
2020-02-25 16:11 ` Brian Foster
2020-02-26 16:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-02-27 9:27 ` Chandan Rajendra [this message]
2020-02-24 4:00 ` [PATCH V4 RESEND 2/7] xfs: xfs_attr_calc_size: Use local variables to track individual space components Chandan Rajendra
2020-02-25 16:11 ` Brian Foster
2020-02-26 10:38 ` Chandan Rajendra
2020-02-24 4:00 ` [PATCH V4 RESEND 3/7] xfs: xfs_attr_calc_size: Calculate Bmbt blks only once Chandan Rajendra
2020-02-25 16:11 ` Brian Foster
2020-02-26 15:03 ` Chandan Rajendra
2020-02-26 16:42 ` Brian Foster
2020-02-27 8:59 ` Chandan Rajendra
2020-02-27 11:53 ` Brian Foster
2020-02-27 13:38 ` Chandan Rajendra
2020-02-24 4:00 ` [PATCH V4 RESEND 4/7] xfs: Introduce struct xfs_attr_set_resv Chandan Rajendra
2020-02-25 16:27 ` Brian Foster
2020-02-26 10:40 ` Chandan Rajendra
2020-02-24 4:00 ` [PATCH V4 RESEND 5/7] xfs: xfs_attr_calc_size: Explicitly pass mp, namelen and valuelen args Chandan Rajendra
2020-02-25 16:27 ` Brian Foster
2020-02-24 4:00 ` [PATCH V4 RESEND 6/7] xfs: Make xfs_attr_calc_size() non-static Chandan Rajendra
2020-02-25 16:24 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-02-24 4:00 ` [PATCH V4 RESEND 7/7] xfs: Fix log reservation calculation for xattr insert operation Chandan Rajendra
2020-02-25 17:19 ` Brian Foster
2020-02-26 11:21 ` Chandan Rajendra
2020-02-26 18:50 ` Brian Foster
2020-02-27 9:14 ` Chandan Rajendra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3674803.ahhNVcWJD3@localhost.localdomain \
--to=chandan@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=chandanrlinux@gmail.com \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox